Why Are Samsung Cell Phones Rated The Lowest Radiation Cell Phones?

FCC Cellular Values:Head SAR | Body SAR | FCC Simultaneous Values:Head SAR | Body SAR | Hotspot SAR


By Head SAR Test (Cellular Only) | Next Test >>
SAR Rank Model Phone Head SAR % of 1.6 W/kg
1st Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 4
0.17 W/kg 10.63% Legal Limit
2nd Place
samsung-galaxy-z-flip4-5g
SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP4
0.19 W/kg 11.88% Legal Limit
3rd Place
samsung-galaxy-a70
SAMSUNG GALAXY A70
0.26 W/kg 16.25% Legal Limit
4th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 9
0.27 W/kg 16.88% Legal Limit
5th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S10 5G
0.30 W/kg 18.75% Legal Limit
6th Place
samsung-galaxy-s6-sar-levels
SAMSUNG GALAXY S6
0.31 W/kg 19.38% Legal Limit
7th Place
samsung-galaxy-a50-
SAMSUNG GALAXY A50
0.34 W/kg 21.25% Legal Limit
8th Place
samsung-galaxy-s9-sar-levels
SAMSUNG GALAXY S9
0.35 W/kg 21.88% Legal Limit
9th Place
samsung-galaxy-s9-plus-sar-levels
SAMSUNG GALAXY S9 PLUS
0.36 W/kg 1 of 2 tied at #9
22.5% Legal Limit
9th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S10E
0.36 W/kg 1 of 2 tied at #9
22.5% Legal Limit
11th Place
samsung-galaxy-s8-sar-level
SAMSUNG GALAXY S8
0.38 W/kg 23.75% Legal Limit
12th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S10
0.39 W/kg 24.38% Legal Limit
13th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S10 PLUS
0.41 W/kg 25.63% Legal Limit
14th Place
samsung-galaxy-s8-plus-sar-level
SAMSUNG GALAXY S8 PLUS
0.42 W/kg 26.25% Legal Limit
15th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S7
0.43 W/kg 26.88% Legal Limit
16th Place
samsung-galaxy-a72-4g
SAMSUNG GALAXY A72
0.56 W/kg 35% Legal Limit
17th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A32 5G
0.57 W/kg 35.63% Legal Limit
18th Place
samsung-galaxy-s21-plus-5g-[1]
SAMSUNG GALAXY S21 PLUS
0.65 W/kg 40.63% Legal Limit
19th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A23 5G
0.68 W/kg 42.5% Legal Limit
20th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S10 LITE
0.69 W/kg 43.13% Legal Limit
21st Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S20 FE
0.70 W/kg 43.75% Legal Limit
22nd Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A33
0.71 W/kg 44.38% Legal Limit
23rd Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A73
0.74 W/kg 46.25% Legal Limit
24th Place
samsung-galaxy-a53-5g
SAMSUNG GALAXY A53 5G
0.75 W/kg 1 of 2 tied at #24
46.88% Legal Limit
24th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A22 5G
0.75 W/kg 1 of 2 tied at #24
46.88% Legal Limit
26th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S21 ULTRA
0.77 W/kg 1 of 2 tied at #26
48.13% Legal Limit
26th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY M52 5G
0.77 W/kg 1 of 2 tied at #26
48.13% Legal Limit
28th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A51 5G
0.82 W/kg 51.25% Legal Limit
29th Place
samsung-galaxy-s20-plus
SAMSUNG GALAXY S20 PLUS
0.94 W/kg 1 of 2 tied at #29
58.75% Legal Limit
29th Place
S20 Ultra
SAMSUNG GALAXY S20 ULTRA
0.94 W/kg 1 of 2 tied at #29
58.75% Legal Limit
31st Place
samsung-galaxy-a52-4g
SAMSUNG GALAXY A52
0.95 W/kg 59.38% Legal Limit
32nd Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A22
0.97 W/kg 60.63% Legal Limit
33rd Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A50S
0.98 W/kg 61.25% Legal Limit
34th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S22
1.03 W/kg 64.38% Legal Limit
35th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FLIP3
1.05 W/kg 65.63% Legal Limit
36th Place
samsung-galaxy-s20-
SAMSUNG GALAXY S20
1.07 W/kg 66.88% Legal Limit
37th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A42 5G
1.11 W/kg 69.38% Legal Limit
38th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A12
1.16 W/kg 72.5% Legal Limit
39th Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY S22 ULTRA
1.18 W/kg 73.75% Legal Limit
40th Place
samsung-galaxy-s22-plus-5g[1]
SAMSUNG GALAXY S22 PLUS
1.19 W/kg 74.38% Legal Limit
41st Place
SAMSUNG GALAXY A13
1.27 W/kg 79.38% Legal Limit

Updated on January 12th, 2023 at 11:54 pm

Note:  We provide the SAR levels for Apple iPhone to compare HERE.

Before we get started, it should be known that Samsungs newest design flip phone, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 SAR tested in Aug 2022, ranks among the lowest head SAR levels recorded for any smartphone. In fact, as for the year 2022, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 had the lowest SAR value for the head of any 2022 smartphone sold in the USA (when in cellular mode only).   Sounds good, right? Not so fast! The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 was also the HIGHEST SAR level test of any phone in 2022 (tied with several others) when tested with all other transmitters, Wi-Fi, etc., active.   The antenna relocation many people praise does lower head SAR levels, but the trade-off is more radiation to other body parts.   The chart above has six different SAR tests listed for each phone. Click the navigation links above the chart for each FCC SAR test before you fall for clever SAR marketing on the least realistic value, only cellular transmitter active.

 

Samsung adopted an innovative antenna system in 2006 to “enhance handset safety by radiating most of the transmitted RF energy away from the handset user” and improve RF (radio frequency) performance.   

BUT don’t get fooled by SAR levels!

Searching for a way to lower radiation exposure based on the FCC’s SAR guidelines sounds like the intelligent, responsible, and educated thing to do—right? Think again! This post points out several shortcomings of the general acceptance of thermally based safety guidelines and not addressing actual microwave radiation exposure below thermal levels.

The Samsung Galaxy S10e, FCCID A3LSMG970F, ranks well among popular Smartphones as one of the lowest SAR Smartphones available still in 2023, with a Head SAR Level of only 0.34 W/kg (watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue). Great right? No, this phone is also tied with 18 other phones as the HIGHEST radiation level of any phone sold in the USA at 1.59 W/kg, depending on which test results you look at. However, to achieve these low levels of RF exposure reported, it is required to keep a distance of up to 15mm from the body. Therefore, there is much more to phone radiation safety than SAR levels alone!

It’s a good idea to research which Smartphone has the lowest SAR before buying yourself or a loved one a high-frequency microwave transmitter carried next to the body all day. From an RF design perspective, Samsung is the only manufacturer striving to make lower radiation exposure a Smartphone design priority.   But even this is misleading regarding SAR levels because the FCC allows manufacturers to choose SAR testing between 5mm and 15mm of separation distance, and many phones test at different distances from the simulated head and body. For this reason, it makes it almost impossible to compare phones from different manufacturers to each other accurately. One thing you must understand about Samsungs lower radiation level is the antenna is transmitting closer to your neck, where you have no bone to protect you – yet it is farther away from the test sensor when these safety tests were performed based on a test procedure designed a quarter of a century ago without being updated AT ALL for use by children!!

beau-biden-brain-tumor-cell-phone-radiation
Beau Biden Brain Tumor Caused By Cell Phone Radiation?

BREAKING NEWS: Canadian MP introduces Bill C-648 to protect Canadians by changing the way consumers think about cell phones regulated under thermal guidelines (SAR LEVELS), wi-fi, cordless phones, baby monitors, and other wireless devices by empowering them with the information they need to understand potential severe risks to their health from long-term and continuous use of these devices, AND the more significant risks to children.

In 2014 Berkeley, CA, started a law that consumers are made aware of RF radiation dangers. But, as it seems, what you don’t know could kill you, according to the latest Smartphone product liability lawsuits filed in DC.

Cell phones sold in the USA vary in terms of their Specific Absorption Rate or SAR, the Federal government’s measure of the maximum amount of microwave radiation absorbed by the head or body.

The FCC requires all cell phones sold in the USA not to exceed a maximum SAR of 1.6 watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue. However, official documents show the FCC is under pressure from doctors and scientists who insist current guidelines are not enough. See Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radio-frequency Exposure Limits and Policies” (Proceeding Number 13-84).
As the FCC shuffles through 950 submissions — most calling for more robust safety regulation; Scientists and organizations have labeled SAR standards as “not being able to protect the public“from hazards proven at non-thermal exposure levels.   As well as increased pressure for fast action regarding the FCC’s review of SAR guidelines.

Most critical shortcomings of SAR testing need to be understood

  • A cell phone’s SAR is assessed using an artificial laboratory model of a 6-foot-1-inch adult male.
  • It does not consider women, children, or prenatal exposure
  • The lower the SAR, the less the user is exposed to thermal levels of microwave radiation.
  • Does not consider non-thermal ROS effects linked to DNA damage.

 

The BIGGEST problem with SAR FCC safety guidelines……….

They haven’t been updated in a quarter of a century! Thus, the 15mm clause in SAR testing is currently allowed because cell phones didn’t fit in your pocket a quarter of a century ago as they do today!

 

PLEASE SHARE THIS INFORMATION WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY!