Featured Smartphone Radiation Safety Products

YOUR MOST IMPORTANT CALL – CELL PHONE RADIATION SAFETY!

beau-biden-brain-tumor-cell-phone-radiationResearch has proven how cell phone radiation damages DNA in a two-stage process involving ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species). DNA damage was previously shown by Dr. Henry Lai with proof of DNA single and double-strand breaks at levels below currently accepted safe FCC exposure levels. However, one of these mechanisms wasn’t discovered until recently. In addition, current knowledge includes what cell types, notably Schwann and Glial cells, are highly susceptible to microwave radiation. Glial cells are closely related to Schwann cells, but why Schwann and glial cells appear to be targets of cell phone radiation is not clear. Microwave effects on glial cells correlate with the increases in highly aggressive glioblastoma brain tumors.

This type of brain tumor killed Joe Biden’s most honorable son Joseph (Beau) Biden III (46), when he died of a glioblastoma brain tumor on Saturday, May 30th, 2015. Meanwhile, microwave effects to Schwann cells correlate with schwannomas; however, because the phone is closer to the ear than the heart translates to increases in acoustic neuromas, which had also seen huge increases over prior decades before cell phones became popular.

Learn more about the must have QuantaCase RF Safe smartphone radiation shields and QuantaBuds RF Safe air-tube headsets

ABOUT RADIO FREQUENCY SAFE – CELL PHONE RADIATION SAFETY

RF SAFE is a world-leading provider of cell phone radiation protection accessories and informational safety data. Since 1998 RF (Radio Frequency) Safe has been dedicated to evolving the wireless industry’s safety standards by engaging in the business of design, testing, manufacture, and sale of safety technologies to mitigate harmful effects of cell phone radiation. RF Safe shut down for over a year during the COVID pandemic, as disruptions took a personal toll on RF Safe’s workforce and business on many levels.

RF Safe launched REBOOT 2021 to provide the most innovative healthy lifestyle phone cases again before the holidays. During the downtime, RF Safe’s founder invented a new communications system that uses the same EMR energy well-known to target human Schwann and glial cells in current generation wireless products by reengineering what was harmful EMR to target airborne bio-hazards while remaining unable to penetrate the nucleus of humans skin or cause harm to eye cells. Using peak EMR energy at a frequency that from a physics perspective “cannot pass the dead layers of human skin cells,” therefore creating the certain possibility of ZERO-SAR communication devices with a human safe wireless bio-defense mode.

Reproductive

.

Cell Phone Radiation

SAR TESTING PHONE RADIATION CASE

DETAILS

Brain Tumors

Cell Phone Radiation Warning Prevails In Appeals Court!

The Ninth Circuit panel refused to overturn a ruling and upheld a Berkeley, California, law that forces retailers to warn consumers about the potential health risks of cell phones in a 2-1 decision. Higher courts acknowledged that since May of 2011, the IARC classification for cell phone radiation internationally had been officially documented as a Class 2B Carcinogen. With only the city of Berkeley being an exception, the public isn’t adequately informed on safe cell phone usage and the potential health effects of cell phone radiation. Once you have considered that EVERY SINGLE, one of the world’s most significant studies has concluded Smartphones sold as “safe” under current FCC’s SAR regulatory guidelines” — may not provide any degree of safety whatsoever!

The Interphone, Hardell, CERENAT, and the more recently concluded U.S Government studies have all pointed towards a common risk of increased brain cancer! For example, in May 2016, the 25 million dollar study by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) announced that male rats exposed to cell phone radiation over two years developed higher cancer rates. The NTP study is the world’s longest planned and carefully done cell phone cancer study to date.

Intrinsically today’s wireless technology possesses a significant health concern because of outdated antenna technology and wavelengths that allow for excess RF exposure, combined with the adoption of ever-changing microwave frequency modulations that are completely untested for biological health effects as each generation wireless network surpasses the next.

It only requires a little research to clarify why RF Safe offer’s several of the best ways to reduce cell phone radiation for most wireless usage scenarios, proving the need to accelerate the innovation rate of wireless technology not reliant on the microwave spectrum.

QuantaBud Best Seller Air-Tube Headsets

Must have RF Safe products from our top selling air-tube headset brand

.

VIEW MORE

Cell Phone Radiation

VIEW MORE

.

VIEW MORE

.

RF Safe Stands For Phone Radiation Safety

As it stands today, it’s a jungle out there. The dividing line between truth, fiction, what will protect you, and what won’t (1),(2) has never been less clearly defined. Since the advent of the digital information explosion, the sea of information has been growing at a pace that few can follow. However, if we are to be responsible and seek the truth, we must persevere for the sake of our children today and future generations whose lives may depend on it. RF Safe is dedicated to the truth and providing ONLY the best RF safety solutions.

QuantaBud RF Safe Air-tube Headsets

Popular 3.5mm RF Safe QuantaBud Headset products by Quanta X Technology

Testimonial

.

Darío Pineda, RF Safe Case
Testimonial

..

Lisa Smith, RF Safe Case

The most recent studies have shown us that the debate about cell phone radiation being hazardous or not is finally over. Therefore, it is time to create a cell phone radiation policy to address these issues, as bio-effects have been observed for decades in peer-reviewed studies.

Therefore, governments of every country need to create legislation that will limit cell phone radiation. Furthermore, governments must demand mandates to reduce radiation levels by forcing cell phone manufacturers and service providers to use different antenna technologies and wavelengths/frequencies than the existing ones used today for next-generation broadband wireless data transmission.

RF Safe has a focus that supports forward progress of the wireless industry and governmental agencies in standardization for safer cell phones to accelerate the pace that cell phone users are adequately informed on the hazards of current wireless technology and able to attain safer wireless technologies “at the point of sale.”

From Our Wireless Phone Radiation Blog

The latest Cell Phone Radiation News Covered By RF Safe

FEATURED

ON SALE

TOP RATED

LATEST SAR LEVELS

Stop 5G, Skip 6G and End Future Pandemics with 7G Wireless Technology

The frequency band used in UVGi-Fi is light of a much higher EMR frequency than that of microwave radiofrequency (RF) communications. RF radiation in the microwave spectrum presents potential adverse health effects. However, IoT wireless communications using solar-blind Far-UV light cannot penetrate human cells. Also, far-UV communications don’t suffer the shortcomings of traditional electromagnetic interference (EMI) and signal interception technology. New germicidal wireless communications guarantees an RF safe and confidential interference-free communication environment from solid-state Far-UVC communications technology such as UVGi-Fi. Far UV Innovations presents some novel solutions in scenarios where Far UV-C can be a viable alternative to conventional communication.

When you hear claims that Far UV is harmless to people, while this is true for human exposure up to thresholds, time to limits values is still a thing.

No different than SAR levels when using the RF spectrum for communications. SAR indicates a safe level of radiation exposure from your smartphone.

The light-based communications industry using germicidal light frequencies will also have regulatory guidance for Time to Limit Values.

It is safe to assume new time limit values will be established as research fine-tunes the safest possible frequency window for UVGi-Fi and Far UV lighting. However, far UV irradiation must never exceed regulatory guidelines for UVC exposure regarding eye and skin safety. Regulatory agencies have no distinction between FAR UVC and UVC when considering human exposure as this “safe” window is a recent discovery.

Far UV is effective for inactivating viruses and transmitting wireless data while remaining below these thresholds. The thresholds still exist. What we can do within them has changed.

Far UVC is safe in occupied public spaces, up to the allowable threshold limit value of 25 mJ/cm2 at 220nm, ACGIH 2021, or perhaps beyond these limits as more recent research is taken into account human safety while disinfecting contaminated air and surfaces to limit the presence and transmission of viruses using Far-UV light.

2021 Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) and Biological Exposure Indices (BEIs) The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)

As for ozone production, Far-UV solid-state has a considerable advantage over KrCl lamps at the same wavelength peak. Newer Far-UV lights have reduced ozone using conductive printing on the tube to minimize arching, while any wavelength shorter than 240nm will affect the atmosphere. In addition, sealing in the semiconductor limits ozone leakage into an environment.

Nano-LEDs can easily regulate the power to maximize data transmission while reducing virus transmission incorporating the lowest ozone production, which has its own set of thresholds imposed by government guidelines.

So it is safe to say Far UV effectively inactivates viruses and transmits wireless data while remaining below ALL human safety exposure thresholds. Therefore, Far-UV TLVs should get reexamined the same way as current SAR level guidelines are scheduled for reevaluation by the FCC by court order!

BRAND LOGOS