RF Safe
Samsung's All-Time Lowest Radiation Cell Phones
Which Samsung smartphone had the lowest radiation for Head SAR testing across all years? According to FCC test reports, the Samsung phone with the lowest SAR rating was 0.19 W/kg, accounting for 11.88% of the 1.6 W/kg limit. In contrast, the highest SAR Samsung phone had a 1.27 W/kg rating, or 79.38% of the limit. This equates to a 568.42% difference between the two extremes.
Head SAR
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Head SAR Value | % Legal Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
1st | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 | 0.19 W/kg | 11.88% |
2nd | Samsung Galaxy A70 | 0.26 W/kg | 16.25% |
3rd | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | 0.30 W/kg | 18.75% |
4th | Samsung Galaxy A50 | 0.34 W/kg | 21.25% |
5th | Samsung Galaxy S9 | 0.35 W/kg | 21.88% |
6th | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | 0.36 W/kg | 22.5% |
Tied 6th | Samsung Galaxy S10e | 0.36 W/kg | 22.5% |
7th | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | 0.41 W/kg | 25.63% |
8th | Samsung Galaxy A14 | 0.48 W/kg | 30% |
9th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A72 | 0.56 W/kg | 35% |
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Head SAR | % Legal Limit |
10th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A32 5G | 0.57 W/kg | 35.63% |
11th | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | 0.62 W/kg | 38.75% |
12th | Samsung Galaxy A23 4G | 0.63 W/kg | 39.38% |
13th![samsung-galaxy-s21-plus-5g-[1]](https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/samsung-galaxy-s21-plus-5g-1-66x66.jpg) | Samsung Galaxy S21 PLUS | 0.65 W/kg | 40.63% |
14th | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | 0.68 W/kg | 42.5% |
15th | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | 0.69 W/kg | 43.13% |
16th | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE | 0.70 W/kg | 43.75% |
17th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A33 5G | 0.71 W/kg | 44.38% |
18th | Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus | 0.72 W/kg | 45% |
19th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A73 | 0.74 W/kg | 46.25% |
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Head SAR | % Legal Limit |
Tied 19th | Samsung Galaxy S21 | 0.74 W/kg | 46.25% |
20th | Samsung Galaxy A34 | 0.75 W/kg | 46.88% |
Tied 20th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A53 5G | 0.75 W/kg | 46.88% |
Tied 20th | Samsung Galaxy S23 | 0.75 W/kg | 46.88% |
Tied 20th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A22 5G | 0.75 W/kg | 46.88% |
21st | Samsung Galaxy S21 FE | 0.77 W/kg | 48.13% |
Tied 21st | Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra | 0.77 W/kg | 48.13% |
Tied 21st | SAMSUNG GALAXY M52 5G | 0.77 W/kg | 48.13% |
22nd | Samsung Galaxy A03s | 0.79 W/kg | 49.38% |
23rd | SAMSUNG GALAXY A51 5G | 0.82 W/kg | 51.25% |
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Head SAR | % Legal Limit |
24th | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | 0.87 W/kg | 54.38% |
25th | Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus | 0.94 W/kg | 58.75% |
26th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A52 | 0.95 W/kg | 59.38% |
27th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A22 | 0.97 W/kg | 60.63% |
28th | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra | 0.98 W/kg | 61.25% |
Tied 28th | Samsung Galaxy A50S | 0.98 W/kg | 61.25% |
29th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A14 5G | 1.00 W/kg | 62.5% |
30th | Samsung Galaxy S22 | 1.03 W/kg | 64.38% |
31st | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 | 1.05 W/kg | 65.63% |
32nd | Samsung Galaxy S20 | 1.07 W/kg | 66.88% |
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Head SAR | % Legal Limit |
33rd | SAMSUNG GALAXY A42 5G | 1.11 W/kg | 69.38% |
34th | Samsung Galaxy A12 | 1.16 W/kg | 72.5% |
35th | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | 1.18 W/kg | 73.75% |
36th![samsung-galaxy-s22-plus-5g[1]](https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/samsung-galaxy-s22-plus-5g1-66x66.jpg) | Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus | 1.19 W/kg | 74.38% |
37th | Samsung Galaxy A13 | 1.27 W/kg | 79.38% |
Lowest: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
Highest: Samsung Galaxy A13
