Samsung's All-Time Lowest Radiation Cell Phones
Which Samsung smartphone had the lowest radiation for Simultaneous Head SAR testing across all years? According to FCC test reports, the Samsung phone with the lowest SAR rating was 0.83 W/kg, accounting for 51.88% of the 1.6 W/kg limit. In contrast, the highest SAR Samsung phone had a 1.59 W/kg rating, or 99.38% of the limit. This equates to a 91.57% difference between the two extremes.
SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Head SAR Value | % Legal Limit |
---|---|---|---|
1st | Samsung Galaxy A03s | 0.83 W/kg | 51.88% |
2nd | Samsung Galaxy A70 | 0.89 W/kg | 55.63% |
3rd | Samsung Galaxy A14 | 0.99 W/kg | 61.88% |
4th | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | 1.04 W/kg | 65% |
5th | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | 1.06 W/kg | 66.25% |
6th | Samsung Galaxy A50 | 1.12 W/kg | 70% |
7th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A72 | 1.13 W/kg | 70.63% |
8th | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | 1.14 W/kg | 71.25% |
9th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A22 | 1.16 W/kg | 72.5% |
10th | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | 1.17 W/kg | 73.13% |
SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Head SAR | % Legal Limit |
Tied 10th | Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra | 1.17 W/kg | 73.13% |
11th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A32 5G | 1.19 W/kg | 74.38% |
12th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A51 5G | 1.21 W/kg | 75.63% |
13th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A22 5G | 1.23 W/kg | 76.88% |
14th | Samsung Galaxy S9 | 1.25 W/kg | 78.13% |
15th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A14 5G | 1.27 W/kg | 79.38% |
16th | Samsung Galaxy A23 4G | 1.28 W/kg | 80% |
Tied 16th | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | 1.28 W/kg | 80% |
17th | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | 1.33 W/kg | 83.13% |
18th | Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus | 1.34 W/kg | 83.75% |
SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Head SAR | % Legal Limit |
19th | Samsung Galaxy S21 FE | 1.36 W/kg | 85% |
20th | SAMSUNG GALAXY M52 5G | 1.38 W/kg | 86.25% |
21st | Samsung Galaxy A12 | 1.41 W/kg | 88.13% |
22nd | Samsung Galaxy A13 | 1.42 W/kg | 88.75% |
23rd | SAMSUNG GALAXY A53 5G | 1.44 W/kg | 90% |
24th | Samsung Galaxy S21 | 1.45 W/kg | 90.63% |
25th | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE | 1.46 W/kg | 91.25% |
26th | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | 1.52 W/kg | 95% |
Tied 26th | Samsung Galaxy A50S | 1.52 W/kg | 95% |
27th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A73 | 1.55 W/kg | 96.88% |
SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Head SAR | % Legal Limit |
Tied 27th | Samsung Galaxy S22 | 1.55 W/kg | 96.88% |
Tied 27th | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | 1.55 W/kg | 96.88% |
28th | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 | 1.56 W/kg | 97.5% |
Tied 28th | Samsung Galaxy S21 PLUS | 1.56 W/kg | 97.5% |
29th | Samsung Galaxy A34 | 1.57 W/kg | 98.13% |
Tied 29th | Samsung Galaxy S24 | 1.57 W/kg | 98.13% |
30th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A52 | 1.58 W/kg | 98.75% |
Tied 30th | Samsung Galaxy S23 | 1.58 W/kg | 98.75% |
31st | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Tied 31st | SAMSUNG GALAXY A42 5G | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Head SAR | % Legal Limit |
Tied 31st | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Tied 31st | Samsung Galaxy S10e | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Tied 31st | Samsung Galaxy S20 | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Tied 31st | Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Tied 31st | Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Tied 31st | Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Tied 31st | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Tied 31st | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Lowest: Samsung Galaxy A03s
Highest: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra