Samsung's All-Time Lowest Radiation Cell Phones
Which Samsung smartphone had the lowest radiation for Simultaneous Body SAR testing across all years? According to FCC test reports, the Samsung phone with the lowest SAR rating was 0.44 W/kg, accounting for 27.5% of the 1.6 W/kg limit. In contrast, the highest SAR Samsung phone had a 1.59 W/kg rating, or 99.38% of the limit. This equates to a 261.36% difference between the two extremes.
Body SAR (Simultaneous)
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Body SAR Value | % Legal Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
1st | Samsung Galaxy A70 | 0.44 W/kg | 27.5% |
2nd | Samsung Galaxy S21 FE | 0.61 W/kg | 38.13% |
3rd | Samsung Galaxy A50 | 0.68 W/kg | 42.5% |
4th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A73 | 1.00 W/kg | 62.5% |
Tied 4th | Samsung Galaxy A50S | 1.00 W/kg | 62.5% |
5th | Samsung Galaxy A14 | 1.05 W/kg | 65.63% |
Tied 5th | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | 1.05 W/kg | 65.63% |
Tied 5th | Samsung Galaxy A54 5G | 1.05 W/kg | 65.63% |
6th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A72 | 1.07 W/kg | 66.88% |
7th | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | 1.11 W/kg | 69.38% |
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Body SAR | % Legal Limit |
8th | Samsung Galaxy A03s | 1.13 W/kg | 70.63% |
9th | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4 | 1.16 W/kg | 72.5% |
10th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A14 5G | 1.17 W/kg | 73.13% |
11th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A52 | 1.21 W/kg | 75.63% |
Tied 11th | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | 1.21 W/kg | 75.63% |
12th | Samsung Galaxy A34 | 1.31 W/kg | 81.88% |
13th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A22 | 1.33 W/kg | 83.13% |
Tied 13th | Samsung Galaxy A23 4G | 1.33 W/kg | 83.13% |
14th | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE | 1.34 W/kg | 83.75% |
15th | Samsung Galaxy S23 | 1.35 W/kg | 84.38% |
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Body SAR | % Legal Limit |
16th | Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite | 1.36 W/kg | 85% |
17th | Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus | 1.37 W/kg | 85.63% |
18th | SAMSUNG GALAXY M52 5G | 1.38 W/kg | 86.25% |
19th | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | 1.42 W/kg | 88.75% |
Tied 19th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A22 5G | 1.42 W/kg | 88.75% |
20th | Samsung Galaxy A13 | 1.45 W/kg | 90.63% |
21st | SAMSUNG GALAXY A32 5G | 1.47 W/kg | 91.88% |
Tied 21st | SAMSUNG GALAXY A51 5G | 1.47 W/kg | 91.88% |
22nd | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 | 1.48 W/kg | 92.5% |
Tied 22nd | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | 1.48 W/kg | 92.5% |
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Body SAR | % Legal Limit |
23rd | Samsung Galaxy A12 | 1.49 W/kg | 93.13% |
24th | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | 1.51 W/kg | 94.38% |
Tied 24th | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | 1.51 W/kg | 94.38% |
25th | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | 1.52 W/kg | 95% |
26th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A53 5G | 1.53 W/kg | 95.63% |
Tied 26th | Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus | 1.53 W/kg | 95.63% |
27th | Samsung Galaxy S21 | 1.54 W/kg | 96.25% |
28th | SAMSUNG GALAXY A42 5G | 1.55 W/kg | 96.88% |
Tied 28th![samsung-galaxy-s21-plus-5g-[1]](https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/samsung-galaxy-s21-plus-5g-1-66x66.jpg) | Samsung Galaxy S21 PLUS | 1.55 W/kg | 96.88% |
Tied 28th | Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus | 1.55 W/kg | 96.88% |
| SAR Rank | Phone Model | Simultaneous Body SAR | % Legal Limit |
29th | Samsung Galaxy S10e | 1.56 W/kg | 97.5% |
Tied 29th![samsung-galaxy-s22-plus-5g[1]](https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/samsung-galaxy-s22-plus-5g1-66x66.jpg) | Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus | 1.56 W/kg | 97.5% |
30th | Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra | 1.57 W/kg | 98.13% |
Tied 30th | Samsung Galaxy S22 | 1.57 W/kg | 98.13% |
31st | Samsung Galaxy S20 | 1.58 W/kg | 98.75% |
Tied 31st | Samsung Galaxy S24 | 1.58 W/kg | 98.75% |
32nd | Samsung Galaxy S9 | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Tied 32nd | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra | 1.59 W/kg | 99.38% |
Lowest: Samsung Galaxy A70
Highest: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
