Rapid Deployment of 5G Wireless Communication and Risk Assessment on Human Health: Quid Novi?

Authors: Selmaoui B, Jamal L, Michelant L

Year: 2025 May

Category: Environmental Health, Electromagnetic Safety

Journal: Bioelectromagnetics

DOI: 10.1002/bem.70005

URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bem.70005

Abstract

Overview

The rapid deployment of 5G wireless communication has sparked considerable debate and concern regarding its potential impacts on human health. As adoption accelerates, users are increasingly exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMFs), particularly in the higher frequency bands such as 3.5–26 GHz, including millimeter waves.

Key Points

  • There is notable public concern and scientific uncertainty surrounding the health effects of frequencies deployed by 5G, due to limited published studies specific to these exposure ranges.
  • The European Union Commission has recognized these knowledge gaps, initiating funding and collaborative networks (e.g., HORIZON-HL-TH-2021-ENVHLTH-02) to address the health risks associated with 5G exposure.
  • Four major research consortia—ETAIN, GOLIAT, NextGEM, and SEAWave—are working together under the CLUE-H network with global collaboration to close research gaps impacting public health and environmental safety.

Conclusion

The rapid implementation of 5G offers significant technological advancement but requires comprehensive and ongoing risk assessment regarding its health effects. While existing guidelines are generally considered adequate at present, the novelty and evolving nature of 5G technology introduces uncertainties—especially around long-term exposure. Continued research, transparent communication, and adaptable regulation are essential. There is a clear scientific recognition that balancing the evident benefits of 5G with precautionary steps is critical to safeguarding public health.

Importantly, there is a recognized link between EMF exposure from 5G networks and potential health risks, warranting further investigation and precautionary approaches.

← Back to Stats