The RF shielding technology inside SafeSleeve Anti-Radiation and RFID blocking wallet case is not tested in their products as they would like you to believe, likewise, Safesleeve’s dishonest marketing claims are nothing new in this industry as well.
About two months ago Safesleevecase.com felt it was necessary to do a comparison on their site titled, “SafeSleeve Vs. PONG Vs. RFSAFE Anti Radiation Phone Cases”. Safesleeve uses embellished claims about RF safe’s cases that are simply not true. Safesleeve claims that RF safe cases block 99% of phone radiation despite that fact RF Safe has never made this claim! RF Safe has never made such a claim because it can’t be done, 99% reduction will take more than a case to achieve and that’s why RF safe offers “safe cell phone accessory packages” containing more than just a phone case. RF safe only makes the claim to reduce excessive radiation exposure. For Safe Sleeve Case to make these misleading statements by overstating percentages of how effective RF Safe case’s shield RF Radiation is a blatant deceptive business practice.
RF Safe prefers using the truth and the facts when educating consumers about wireless hazards and our world famous RF Safe clothing and phone accessories product lines, offered for nearly two decades at rfsafe.com!
When safeSleeve made false claims, started spreading disinformation, and used other misleading tactics to entice sales, they entered the realm of criminally motivated deceptive trade practices.
Now, I know we have gone out of our way to expose companies like Pong case for their part in confusing the public about SAR levels being an acceptable gauge for public safety. When it’s clear that radiation hazards exist at non-thermal levels of exposure, and much like SafeSleeve case claims products are lab proven to reduce radiation 99%, Pong cases also claimed high percentages of reductions using a government-approved wireless industry accepted method referred to as SAR testing.
The founders of Safesleeve should reconsider their business tactics because deceptive trade practices in their state are dealt with under California Business and Professions Code § 17500 et seq. Sections 17500, 17500.5 and 17505 prohibit false advertisements. Pursuant to Section 17500, violation by false advertisement is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or by both.
Pursuant to Section 17535, an Attorney General or any district attorney, county counsel, city attorney, or city prosecutor in California may bring an action upon their own complaint or upon the complaint of any board, officer, person, corporation or association or by any person, injured or damaged as a result of the violation of this Chapter.