Beyond the Invisible: John Coates’ Lifetime Fight to Tame the Electromagnetic Wild West

When the Silent Signal Becomes the Story

Every era has its signature pollutant.
The Industrial Revolution gave us thick, black coal smoke.
Post‑war chemistry brought leaded gasoline and DDT.
Our century’s boom product is wireless connectivity—a triumph of convenience powered by billions of antennas humming day and night.

John Coates, founder of RF Safe, argues that those humming fields are not benign background noise but “entropic waste”: energy that scrambles the body’s bio‑electrical code, yet is as invisible and odorless as gravity. His conviction is not academic. In 1995 Coates lost his first‑born daughter to a catastrophic neural‑tube defect; two years later a microwave‑radiation study linked that defect class to maternal exposure. The tragedy became a promise: understand the risk, tell the world, and push industry and regulators to make wireless technology genuinely safe.

A recent two‑hour interview captures Coates’ journey—engineering breakthroughs, courtroom battles, and an audacious blueprint for a light‑based Internet. What follows expands that conversation into a fully referenced, Pulitzer‑caliber narrative that explores the science, the politics, and the future stakes of our wireless age.

---

A Promise Born of Tragedy

John Coates grew up on military bases during the 1970s, exposed to intense microwave radar radiation far exceeding typical civilian levels. At just seven years old, he was diagnosed with kidney cancer, an illness he firmly attributes to this heightened microwave exposure—similar to recent cases in California where schoolchildren developed kidney cancer near a Sprint cell tower, prompting its eventual removal.

John began his formal scientific education at Tidewater Community College at the age of 15, laying the foundation for a lifetime dedicated to rigorous scientific research. By the mid-1990s, Coates had successfully established a limousine company near Aspen, Colorado. However, his life dramatically changed upon learning through ultrasound that his unborn daughter, Angel Leigh Coates, suffered from a severe neural-tube defect. Angel Leigh tragically passed away shortly after birth.

The pivotal turning point came in 1997 with the Farrell et al. study, which demonstrated EMF-induced abnormalities in chicken embryos—abnormalities identical to the neural-tube defect that took his daughter’s life. This research starkly revealed the hidden dangers of electromagnetic fields (EMFs), previously declared safe by industry and regulatory bodies.

Determined to honor his daughter’s memory and prevent further tragedies, Coates swiftly transitioned from entrepreneurship to advocacy and scientific investigation. He closed his limousine company and founded a dedicated research laboratory, RF Safe, to combat misinformation and push for reform in radiation safety standards. His mission became clear: expose the dangers of EMF radiation, hold regulatory agencies accountable, and ensure public awareness of genuine scientific findings.

First inventions.

• Amorphous‑metal belly bands for pregnant workers in high‑EMF environments.

• The world’s first air‑tube headset, diverting phone audio through hollow tubes so the ear canal sits outside the RF hot‑spot.

• And, controversially, a dual‑element “interferometric” phone antenna that cancelled head‑ward radiation but violated the FCC’s 1980s isotropic‑pattern rule. He spent five years lobbying; the rule finally changed in 2003.

That win convinced Coates of two things:

1. Regulations can move—if the right coalition shows up.

2. Industry will never volunteer safer designs as long as emissions remain the cheapest engineering shortcut.

---

“Entropic Waste” – A New Vocabulary for Electromagnetic Pollution

Most EMF debates fixate on thermal effects: does a phone heat tissue enough to cook it? Coates says that frame is 40 years out of date. Living systems are fundamentally electrical: every cell maintains a membrane potential, every neuron fires ionic currents, every organelle relies on voltage‑gated transport. Introduce erratic, high‑frequency fields and you introduce informational noise.

He calls that noise entropic waste—energy that increases disorder without adding usable work, the opposite of life’s organizing impulse. The term deliberately echoes solid‑waste campaigns: until society acknowledges wireless fields as waste, there will be no incentive to minimize or recycle them.

---

The Science of Harm: What We Know and Choose to Ignore

 Cancer, DNA Breaks and the NTP Bombshell

The U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) spent $30 million exposing rats and mice to GSM and CDMA phone signals. In 2018 it reported “clear evidence” of schwannomas (nerve‑sheath cancers) in the heart and “some evidence” of gliomas in the brain. Four years later, the program quietly announced it would halt further RF work for lack of funds and “technical challenges.” wellsvillesun.com

Fertility Free‑Fall

A 2022 Korean meta‑analysis found significant drops in sperm motility, viability and concentration among heavy phone users. ewg.org
An even starker signal emerged in a World Health Organization technical review released in February 2025: one high‑SAR phone study showed a 68 percent reduction in the odds of achieving pregnancy for couples keeping an active handset in trouser pockets for over four hours a day. medicalnewstoday.com

Non‑linear Dose Response—Why “Low Power” Isn’t Always Safer

The NTP data confounded engineers: rats at 1.5 W/kg developed more tumors than those at 6 W/kg. Fertility researchers see the same paradox—oxidative stress in sperm peaks at 4 hours’ exposure, then partially recovers at 12 hours as repair enzymes switch on. Such non‑linearity explodes the comforting myth that small doses are automatically harmless.

Autism, ADHD and the Behavioral Meltdown in Classrooms

Teachers nationwide report first‑graders “flipping desks and biting staff” at rates unthinkable 15 years ago. Coates does not blame RF alone but notes that hyper‑connectivity has rewritten the school environment:

• Wi‑Fi routers in every room (peak fields 1,000 × natural Schumann resonances).

• LED lighting rich in blue wavelengths that suppress nocturnal melatonin.

• Tablets issued from kindergarten upward, ensuring constant device proximity.

No single study proves causation, yet the precautionary principle—enshrined in environmental law since the 1970s—states that regulators must act when a plausible risk and a feasible alternative exist. Here, both boxes are ticked.

---

Regulatory Capture: Section 704 and the Free‑Speech Ban on Safety

Two legal provisions shape America’s RF landscape:

In 2021 the U.S. Court of Appeals (D.C. Circuit) ruled in EHT v. FCC that the agency “failed to provide a reasoned explanation” for keeping its 1996 thermal‑only limits despite two decades of biological evidence. It ordered a fresh review. law.justia.comehtrust.org
Four years on, that review remains unfinished, and Section 704 is still blocking municipal challenges to towers—even those built less than 500 ft from elementary schools like the one John’s daughter attends.

Capture in plain sight: An FCC funded by spectrum‑auction fees, advised by telecom engineers, sets the very rules that shield telecom build‑outs from health litigation. If the EPA tried to set pesticide limits this way, Congress would revolt.

---

The Technology We Could Have: Li‑Fi, Space‑Cell and Other Clean Alternatives

Li‑Fi—Internet at the Speed of Light

Li‑Fi modulates ordinary LEDs to transmit data in the visible or near‑UV band; walls, not bodies, absorb the photons. Apple’s iOS code base has referenced “LiFiCapability” since 2016, suggesting future iPhones could switch to light indoors. ledinside.comled-professional.com

Health dividend: penetration depth is skin‑deep; inverse‑square losses occur over inches, not miles. A classroom with ceiling Li‑Fi panels can deliver gigabit service while cutting RF exposure three orders of magnitude.

Space‑Based Direct‑to‑Cell

Low‑Earth‑orbit constellations (e.g., Starlink V2) can beam LTE‑class signals from 550 km up. Because field strength falls with the square of distance, ground‑level power density is hundreds of times lower than from a 100‑ft tower outside the playground. Coates supports “moving the big transmitters off‑planet” as phase one of a dual mandate: space‑cell + indoor Li‑Fi.

Mandates Work—Ask the Auto Industry

When the Clean Air Act forced catalytic converters into every car, engineers complied in five years and smog plummeted. Coates argues for the same approach: legislate emission ceilings and let innovators race to meet them. No consumer sacrifice required.

---

Children at the Epicenter – Physics Makes Them the Perfect Antenna

A five‑year‑old’s skull is about 60 percent the thickness of an adult’s; cerebrospinal fluid is more conductive than bone. Dosimetry models show triple the energy deposition in the childhood brain for the same handset. Add thinner skin, rapidly dividing stem cells, and more future years for cancer latency and you get a public‑health time bomb.

Classroom Exposure Index

*Approximate, assuming 0 dBm phone uplink baseline.
Removing indoor RF (tablet + router) does more than banning the phone at the door without changing infrastructure.

---

The Myth of the “Low‑SAR” Phone

SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) tests measure thermal average in a plastic head/torso phantom for six minutes. Loopholes:

1. Manufacturers may insert a holster spacer between phone and phantom anywhere from 5 mm to 15 mm. Samsung often chooses 15 mm; Apple uses 5 mm. The public sees only the numeric SAR, not the distance.

2. Large phones relocate antennas to the bottom, shifting radiation away from the test sensor near the ear—but toward the thyroid and reproductive organs. Studies now report thyroid‑cancer spikes that track smartphone adoption. rfsafe.com

Bottom line: a “low‑SAR” spec can coexist with higher real‑world exposure. Coates maintains the only honest metric is total radiated power over time, something phones can already log but regulators do not require to be disclosed.

 ceLLM Theory – DNA as a Resonant Neural Network

In the interview’s philosophical crescendo, Coates proposes ceLLM (Cellular Latent Learning Model):

Imagine each strand of DNA as a frozen neural network whose “weights” are the quantum‑level distances between atoms. Micro‑tubules act as data buses, feeding environmental signals to this lattice; proteins are the outputs. Toss RF noise into the lattice and you corrupt computation itself, the same way bit‑flips crash digital software.

The metaphor borrows from AI systems where tiny perturbations—adversarial noise—make a model misclassify images. Here, the “image” is the developing embryo and the misclassification could be a neural‑tube defect or a lost temperament trait such as empathy.

Whether ceLLM survives peer review, the analogy is vivid: wireless pollution as a software bug in the code of life.

---

From Awareness to Action – A Citizen’s Toolkit

Personal Mitigation

• Distance & Duration: use speakerphone or air‑tube headsets; keep phones in airplane mode when pocketed.

• Night Sanctuary: remove routers and phones from bedrooms; FAA‑class Faraday pouches are < $15.

• Hard‑wired Alternatives: Ethernet + optical HDMI for streaming boxes; wired baby monitors.

• Lighting Hygiene: warm‑spectrum LEDs or incandescent bulbs after sunset to restore melatonin balance.

Community‑Level Strategies

1. Audit the School: demand RF measurements and a Wi‑Fi timer that shuts routers when classes end.

2. Tower Zoning: where Section 704 blocks health arguments, pursue aesthetic or historic‑preservation grounds; require stealth designs at >1,500 ft from schools (BioInitiative guideline).

3. Library Li‑Fi Pilot: partner with local makerspaces to retrofit a single room—proof shatters myths of impossibility.

Policy Roadmap

Coates believes former HHS Secretary‑hopeful Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and “executive‑order‑happy” Donald Trump could form an unlikely alliance: left‑leaning environmental health meets right‑leaning local‑control populism.

---

Reimagining Connectivity Before the Window Closes

When historians catalog the 21st‑century health landscape, they may rank ubiquitous radio‑frequency radiation alongside leaded gasoline—both “miracle” technologies whose externalized costs became intolerable. We can wait for perfect consensus, or we can apply the lessons of every previous environmental clean‑up: act on early warning signs, shift the burden of proof to polluters, and innovate our way to safer replacements.

John Coates’ life story—engineer, grieving father, policy hacker—reminds us that change begins with a promise. His was to one lost child, but its fulfillment could spare millions. The tools exist: smarter antennas, photonic data links, orbital cell towers, transparent risk research. All that’s missing is political will an inch wider than the wireless lobby’s pocketbook.

Call to Action:

• Share this article with your local PTA, zoning board, or city council.

• Tweet #Repeal704 and tag your representatives.

• Ask your favorite device maker when Li‑Fi will ship.

• Above all, treat the invisible with the same respect you give visible smog: demand less of it.

Progress rarely starts in the halls of Congress; it starts with the citizen who refuses to accept that the price of a phone call is an unsafe womb or a restless mind.