Dr. Sharon Goldberg, a highly respected internal medicine physician with a specialization in environmental health, has dedicated significant effort toward researching the health implications of radiofrequency (RF) radiation. In her poignant address to the Petaluma City School District, Dr. Goldberg provides a critical medical perspective on the potential harms associated with chronic exposure to wireless
Dr. Magda Havas, a respected environmental toxicologist and professor emerita at Trent University in Ontario, Canada, has dedicated her career to researching electromagnetic pollution and its impact on human health. Her extensive studies have provided critical insights into how chronic exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation, particularly from wireless technology, affects health and wellbeing, especially among
Imagine sending your child off to school, confident in the belief that they’re safe, only to later realize that their environment might silently contribute to serious long-term health risks. This alarming scenario is not hypothetical but a growing reality, largely unrecognized by the general public. Radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields, emitted from wireless devices such as
Apple iPhone 16e SAR Level Summary: The cellular transmission SAR values for the Apple iPhone 16e (FCC ID BCG-E8725A) are 1.20 W/kg (watts per kilogram) at the head and 1.20 W/kg when worn on the body. The hotspot/Airplay SAR level is 1.20 W/kg. The simultaneous transmission SAR values for iPhone 16e (cellular plus Wi-Fi) is 1.55 W/kg at the head, 1.50 W/kg
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
“Not waiting for tests, not waiting for standards, not waiting for governments … rule #1 is that the technology drives the policy and not the policy drives the technology.”— Tom Wheeler, 2016 National Press Club Interview Introduction In 2016, as former–Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Tom Wheeler stood before the National Press Club, he made
Government Secrecy and NIH Redactions In a startling move, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is keeping nearly 2,500 pages of documents under wraps related to the shutdown of federal research into wireless radiation’s health effects. When Children’s Health Defense (CHD) filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking answers about why the National Toxicology
Imagine waking up every morning to a silent, invisible presence that follows you everywhere—one that weaves in and out of every home, school, and office, yet remains all but invisible to the naked eye. We are talking about electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation. From the humble cordless phone to advanced cellular networks and Wi-Fi routers, the
Imagine waking up in a world where cell phones, smart devices, and wireless networks are integral to every aspect of daily life—education, healthcare, social interactions, commerce, and entertainment. In many ways, that world has already arrived. From the moment we rise in the morning and check messages on our phones, to the time we drift
Overview of the NTP Wireless Radiation Studies and Findings The National Toxicology Program (NTP), part of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, conducted extensive studies on radiofrequency (RF) wireless radiation used in cell phones. These were long-term experiments on rodents, initiated because of widespread public exposure to wireless devices and the lack of data
The Irony of “Anti-Science”: Elon Musk, RFK Jr., and the Science of Wireless Radiation In a recent interview, former President Donald Trump asked Elon Musk if he liked Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to which Musk responded affirmatively. He went on to say that RFK Jr. is often mislabeled as “anti-science” but is, in fact, someone
The landscape of public health in the United States is shifting dramatically as concerns about electromagnetic radiation (EMR) move from the fringes to the center of federal scrutiny. In February 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Executive Order, explicitly naming EMR as a potential factor for investigation into the
President Donald Trump’s appointments of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Brendan Carr as Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have sparked significant discussions due to their contrasting views on radiofrequency (RF) radiation safety. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Stance on RF Radiation Kennedy has long been a
A Clash of Agencies It’s 2025, and we’re witnessing a potential showdown between two powerful federal bodies: the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), now led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a regulatory agency long accused of ignoring the mounting evidence of non-thermal hazards from radiofrequency (RF) radiation.
Can a single country transform the global conversation on technology and health? In the realm of wireless radiation, France has positioned itself as a leading voice by enacting policies that directly address potential health risks, especially for children. In stark contrast, the United States has long been criticized for regulatory inertia and outdated guidelines. Now,
In a political and public health landscape riddled with controversy, the Senate’s confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) has sparked both excitement and concern. Media outlets and citizens alike have been riveted by Kennedy’s outspoken views on radiofrequency (RF) radiation, vaccines, and the potential overhaul of the
Rewriting the Rules: RFK Jr., the Telecom Industry, and the Coming Revolution in Wireless Safety In a political and public health landscape riddled with controversy, the Senate’s confirmation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) has sparked both excitement and concern. Media outlets and citizens alike have been riveted
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
For decades, the wireless industry has operated under a grand illusion—one that claims radiofrequency (RF) radiation is safe, that regulatory guidelines are adequate, and that consumers have nothing to worry about. But the scientific evidence has always said otherwise. Thousands of peer-reviewed studies have linked RF radiation exposure to biological harm, yet the industry has
Radiofrequency Radiation, Public Health, and the Promise of Safer Solutions Why This Conversation Matters Wireless technology has reshaped our world—powering everything from the smartphone in your pocket to the Wi-Fi-enabled cameras on your porch. Yet despite its ubiquity, the topic of radiofrequency (RF) radiation and its potential health effects remains largely under-discussed in mainstream conversations.
Cell phones have become virtually inseparable from our daily lives. We rely on them for everything – communication, work, entertainment – often carrying them in our pockets from morning till night. Yet mounting scientific evidence suggests that the radiofrequency radiation emitted by cell phones may pose serious dangers to our health. From potential DNA damage
On a chilly evening in early 2022, the Board of Health in this small New England city took an unprecedented step. After months of complaints about unexplained headaches, insomnia, and nosebleeds from families living in the shadow of a new cell tower, the board invoked its duty to protect public well-being and ordered telecom giant
From the playground to the workplace, wireless technology has become so ubiquitous that few pause to question the guidelines intended to protect our health. Yet beneath the surface of everyday convenience lies a troubling reality: Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act prohibits local governments from rejecting cell tower permits on health grounds, effectively silencing
Radiofrequency radiation (RFR) has become a ubiquitous part of modern life. From smartphones and tablets to Wi-Fi routers and the ever-evolving landscape of communication towers, our daily environments are steeped in electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Few among us pause to question the guidelines meant to safeguard public health from potential risks posed by these ever-present signals.
How 1996 Became the Year Corporate Power Trumped Constitutional Rights In 1996, a profound transformation overtook the United States. Instead of unfolding through a dramatic uprising, this transformation took place quietly, under the guise of federal legislation and corporate lobbying. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, celebrated by many as a leap into the digital age,
Our relationship with wireless technology is both empowering and unsettling. On one hand, smartphones and wireless broadband have opened new worlds of convenience and communication—our personal and professional lives often depend on lightning-fast connections. On the other hand, legitimate concerns about the health and environmental effects of these ever-present radiofrequency (RF) signals have surfaced. Governments,
“We’re getting rid of all of the cancer—I call it cancer—the cancer caused by the Biden Administration.” —President Donald Trump, on the day of his swearing-in Few phrases can jolt public attention like the word “cancer.” It conjures images of silent, devastating growths that, unchecked, can destroy life. When President Donald Trump used that word
Into the Invisible Storm: “For the first time in human history, we’re living amidst an unprecedented symphony of man-made electromagnetic fields” Across bustling city centers and quiet suburbs alike, we navigate our daily routines enveloped by a low-level hum of electromagnetic signals—WiFi routers, cell towers, power lines, laptops, and smart devices. Most of us never
