Corporations keep feeding the public the same tired line: “Cell phone radiation isn’t harmful—unless it heats you.” Meanwhile, a growing stack of independent studies shows the exact opposite: non-thermal levels of radiofrequency (RF) radiation can break DNA strands, mess with your genes, and disrupt critical cellular functions. Below are the heavy-hitting studies that rip the
Some people keep parroting, “There’s no evidence that RF radiation causes cancer.” Meanwhile, real scientists around the world have sounded the alarm, linking wireless exposure not just to brain tumors, but also to colon, rectal, and even breast cancers. The studies below tear the corporate cover story to shreds—none of this is speculation, it’s documented
The studies below don’t mince words: wireless radiation—especially from mobile and cordless phones—has repeatedly been associated with malignant and benign brain tumors. If you’re tired of the corporate-driven narrative that ‘there’s no solid evidence,’ then read on. This is the brutal truth, straight from independent research that regulators keep ignoring. Simulation of the Incidence of
Among the many health concerns associated with radiofrequency (RF) radiation, the risk of brain tumors stands out due to the potentially severe consequences. Below, we explore key independent studies and reports that investigate whether long-term or high-intensity exposures—such as those from cell phones, cordless phones, and other wireless devices—may elevate the risk of developing malignant
Independent Science on the Effects of Wireless Radiation on Human Health and the Environment There are more than 1,000 scientific studies conducted by independent researchers from around the world concerning the biological effects of Radiofrequency (RF radiation). Here we present some of the most recent studies. I. Effects on Fetuses Mobile Phone Use During Pregnancy:
As wireless technologies permeate every aspect of modern life, the convenience of connectivity comes with hidden costs. Independent scientific research spanning decades and thousands of studies has consistently revealed concerning biological effects associated with exposure to Radiofrequency (RF) radiation from wireless devices. These studies, conducted globally by researchers without industry ties, challenge the telecom industry’s
Historical Context & Regulatory Capture Industry Influence on FCC Policies: The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has long been subject to “regulatory capture” by the telecom industry. The Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association (CTIA) – the wireless industry’s lobbying arm – has deeply influenced FCC decisions through a revolving door of personnel and lobbying. For
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
As wireless devices become integral to daily life, increasing evidence reveals that chronic exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) significantly impacts mental health and neurological function. This detailed examination explores robust scientific research on neuropsychiatric effects of RFR, clarifies underlying biological mechanisms, highlights critical studies, and provides practical recommendations for protecting mental and neurological well-being. Robust
The proliferation of wireless technology in modern life has significantly increased our exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR). While convenient, substantial scientific evidence highlights severe neuropsychiatric risks and a growing incidence of electrohypersensitivity (EHS) associated with chronic RFR exposure. This comprehensive review explores key scientific research, clarifies underlying biological mechanisms, and underscores the critical need for
In our modern, wireless-driven world, radiofrequency radiation (RFR)—emitted by cell phones, Wi-Fi routers, and numerous other devices—is omnipresent. While these technologies offer undeniable convenience, emerging scientific research underscores serious threats posed by RFR to our immune systems. This comprehensive review delves deeply into the science behind RFR-induced immune dysfunction, highlights key studies, elucidates the biological
Recent extensive scientific literature highlights the diverse health impacts associated with chronic exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation from wireless technologies. To clarify and contextualize this critical research, we’ve categorized significant studies into coherent themes, providing detailed explanations and insights for each category. This approach offers readers a clear understanding of the depth and range of
Dr. Sharon Goldberg, a highly respected internal medicine physician with a specialization in environmental health, has dedicated significant effort toward researching the health implications of radiofrequency (RF) radiation. In her poignant address to the Petaluma City School District, Dr. Goldberg provides a critical medical perspective on the potential harms associated with chronic exposure to wireless
Dr. Magda Havas, a respected environmental toxicologist and professor emerita at Trent University in Ontario, Canada, has dedicated her career to researching electromagnetic pollution and its impact on human health. Her extensive studies have provided critical insights into how chronic exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation, particularly from wireless technology, affects health and wellbeing, especially among
Imagine sending your child off to school, confident in the belief that they’re safe, only to later realize that their environment might silently contribute to serious long-term health risks. This alarming scenario is not hypothetical but a growing reality, largely unrecognized by the general public. Radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields, emitted from wireless devices such as
Apple iPhone 16e SAR Level Summary: The cellular transmission SAR values for the Apple iPhone 16e (FCC ID BCG-E8725A) are 1.20 W/kg (watts per kilogram) at the head and 1.20 W/kg when worn on the body. The hotspot/Airplay SAR level is 1.20 W/kg. The simultaneous transmission SAR values for iPhone 16e (cellular plus Wi-Fi) is 1.55 W/kg at the head, 1.50 W/kg
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
“Not waiting for tests, not waiting for standards, not waiting for governments … rule #1 is that the technology drives the policy and not the policy drives the technology.”— Tom Wheeler, 2016 National Press Club Interview Introduction In 2016, as former–Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Tom Wheeler stood before the National Press Club, he made
Government Secrecy and NIH Redactions In a startling move, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is keeping nearly 2,500 pages of documents under wraps related to the shutdown of federal research into wireless radiation’s health effects. When Children’s Health Defense (CHD) filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests seeking answers about why the National Toxicology
Imagine waking up every morning to a silent, invisible presence that follows you everywhere—one that weaves in and out of every home, school, and office, yet remains all but invisible to the naked eye. We are talking about electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation. From the humble cordless phone to advanced cellular networks and Wi-Fi routers, the
Imagine waking up in a world where cell phones, smart devices, and wireless networks are integral to every aspect of daily life—education, healthcare, social interactions, commerce, and entertainment. In many ways, that world has already arrived. From the moment we rise in the morning and check messages on our phones, to the time we drift
Overview of the NTP Wireless Radiation Studies and Findings The National Toxicology Program (NTP), part of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, conducted extensive studies on radiofrequency (RF) wireless radiation used in cell phones. These were long-term experiments on rodents, initiated because of widespread public exposure to wireless devices and the lack of data
The Irony of “Anti-Science”: Elon Musk, RFK Jr., and the Science of Wireless Radiation In a recent interview, former President Donald Trump asked Elon Musk if he liked Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to which Musk responded affirmatively. He went on to say that RFK Jr. is often mislabeled as “anti-science” but is, in fact, someone
The landscape of public health in the United States is shifting dramatically as concerns about electromagnetic radiation (EMR) move from the fringes to the center of federal scrutiny. In February 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Executive Order, explicitly naming EMR as a potential factor for investigation into the
President Donald Trump’s appointments of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Brendan Carr as Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have sparked significant discussions due to their contrasting views on radiofrequency (RF) radiation safety. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Stance on RF Radiation Kennedy has long been a
A Clash of Agencies It’s 2025, and we’re witnessing a potential showdown between two powerful federal bodies: the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), now led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a regulatory agency long accused of ignoring the mounting evidence of non-thermal hazards from radiofrequency (RF) radiation.
Can a single country transform the global conversation on technology and health? In the realm of wireless radiation, France has positioned itself as a leading voice by enacting policies that directly address potential health risks, especially for children. In stark contrast, the United States has long been criticized for regulatory inertia and outdated guidelines. Now,
