Electromagnetic fields, 5G and health: what about the precautionary principle?

Abstract

Overview

New fifth generation (5G) telecommunications systems, now being rolled out globally, have sparked considerable debate. Despite assurances from some health agencies, independent scientific reviews have highlighted significant uncertainties and emerging evidence of potential harm from radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) associated with 5G technologies.

Findings

• Lack of clarity on the complete spectrum of 5G technologies.
• Evidence from laboratory studies showing disruptive effects of RF-EMFs, though with gaps in research.
• A dearth of high-quality epidemiological studies on 5G, but growing evidence of adverse effects from previous RF-EMF exposure generations.
• Concerns over national regulatory bodies being influenced by conflicts of interest.

The essay reflects on these points and notes a rising level of exposure from densely placed 5G transmitters, advocating for a moratorium based on the precautionary principle until more definitive research is available.

Conclusion

Given the substantial uncertainties and potential for significant health impacts, the author, an experienced epidemiologist, supports halting further 5G deployment pending conclusive investigation. This aligns with the need to prioritize public health and ecological concerns over economic or convenience enhancements.