Electromagnetic fields, 5G and health: what about the precautionary principle?

Abstract

Overview

New fifth generation (5G) telecommunications systems, now being globally implemented, have sparked controversy regarding their safety. While some health protection agencies believe there is no conclusive evidence of harm, independent scientific reviews indicate significant uncertainty and emerging evidence of possible harmful biological effects from radio frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposures.

Findings

• Lack of clarity on 5G technology specifics.
• In vitro and in vivo laboratory studies showing disruptive effects of RF-EMFs, though research gaps exist.
• Almost total lack of quality epidemiological studies on 5G EMF exposure specifically, but emerging evidence of adverse effects from earlier RF-EMF generations.
• Allegations of regulatory authorities' conflicts of interest and outdated safety policies.

Conclusion

The author advises caution based on the precautionary principle and supports calls for a global moratorium on further 5G rollouts pending conclusive research on their safety.

Additional Insights

Discusses notable resistance to conspiracy theories linking 5G to COVID-19. Emphasizes the need for evidence-based regulation to protect public health, given the plausible serious health effects of RF-EMFs on humans and the ecological impact on other species.