Shielding methods and products against man-made Electromagnetic Fields: Protection versus risk

Authors: Panagopoulos DJ, Chrousos GP

Year: 2019 Feb 23

Category: Environmental Health

Journal: Sci Total Environ

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.344

URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30831365

Abstract

Overview

Human exposure to man-made Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) has significantly increased, along with a rise in various health problems. This abstract explores the connection indicated by numerous studies between EMFs and health issues.

Findings

  • In urban environments, cases of Electro-hyper-sensitivity (EHS) are becoming more common.
  • Private companies and individuals are increasingly recommending metal shielding as a protective measure against man-made EMFs, despite concerns about their safety and effectiveness.
  • The shielding not only attenuates harmful man-made EMFs but also impacts natural non-polarized EMFs, which are crucial for biological rhythmicity and overall well-being.

Shielding Evaluation

The physical principles of EMF-shielding are analyzed, alongside the significance of natural atmospheric EMFs. Current shielding methods and products are scrutinized based on scientific evidence.

Conclusion

The document concludes that avoiding exposure to man-made EMFs is generally safer than attempting to shield from them. It criticizes the use of metallic patches or "chips" sold as protective, highlighting their potential risks and inefficacy.

Furthermore, it calls for urgent research into the safety and efficacy of shielding methods combined with natural atmospheric frequency generators.

← Back to Stats