• Home
  • Research
    • Glossary
    • Health Hazards
      • DNA Damage
      • DNA And The Microwave Effect
      • Birth Defects
      • Breast Cancer
      • Brain Tumors
  • Get Protected Now
    • RF Safety Accessory Packages
    • Search By Phone Model
      • Apple Devices
      • Samsung Devices
    • RF Safe Cases
      • G-Series (Graphene) Anti-Radiation Cases
      • F-Series (Folio) Anti-Radiation Cases
      • D-I-Y RF Shielded Cases
      • RF Safe Pouches
    • RF Safe Headsets
      • Stereo Air Tube Headset
      • Mono Air Tube Headset
      • Stereo Ear Hook Air tube
      • Mono Ear Hook Air tube
      • RF Safe Ferrite Beads
      • 3.5mm Bluetooth Dongle
    • EMF/RF Apparel
      • Anti-Radiation Maternity Shirt
      • RF/EMF Shielded Maternity Apron
      • RF/EMF Shielded Women’s V-Neck
      • EMF/RF Shielded Men’s Shirt
      • RF/EMF Shielded Underwear
    • RF Safe Peel-n-Shield™
  • SAR Levels
    • Specific Absorption Rate
    • What is RF Radiation?
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
    • Login
    • View Shopping Cart
    • Secure Checkout
    • Warranty Coverage
    • Order Tracking
    • Lost Password
  • 0 items$0.00
RF (Radio Frequency) Safe
  • April 26th, 2018
  • Apple RF Safety Accessories
  • Google RF Safety Accessories
  • Samsung RF Safety Accessories
RF (Radio Frequency) Safe
  • Home
  • Research
    • Glossary
    • Health Hazards
      • DNA Damage
      • DNA And The Microwave Effect
      • Birth Defects
      • Breast Cancer
      • Brain Tumors
  • Get Protected Now
    • RF Safety Accessory Packages
    • Search By Phone Model
      • Apple Devices
      • Samsung Devices
    • RF Safe Cases
      • G-Series (Graphene) Anti-Radiation Cases
      • F-Series (Folio) Anti-Radiation Cases
      • D-I-Y RF Shielded Cases
      • RF Safe Pouches
    • RF Safe Headsets
      • Stereo Air Tube Headset
      • Mono Air Tube Headset
      • Stereo Ear Hook Air tube
      • Mono Ear Hook Air tube
      • RF Safe Ferrite Beads
      • 3.5mm Bluetooth Dongle
    • EMF/RF Apparel
      • Anti-Radiation Maternity Shirt
      • RF/EMF Shielded Maternity Apron
      • RF/EMF Shielded Women’s V-Neck
      • EMF/RF Shielded Men’s Shirt
      • RF/EMF Shielded Underwear
    • RF Safe Peel-n-Shield™
  • SAR Levels
    • Specific Absorption Rate
    • What is RF Radiation?
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
    • Login
    • View Shopping Cart
    • Secure Checkout
    • Warranty Coverage
    • Order Tracking
    • Lost Password
  • 0 items$0.00
  • Follow
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google+
    • Linkedin
    • Youtube
    • Tumblr
Home
Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation Expert Dariusz Leszczynski Speaks in New Delhi 9/16/2014

Cell Phone Radiation

Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest
Dariusz-IARC-Member

Dariusz-IARC-Member

A member of the expert committee at World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2011,  Dariusz Leszczynski spoke at an event organized by Syenergy Environics at the India International Centre (IIC).  The Topic: “Mobile tower and cell phone radiation – its threat and perception”.

The key expert speaker Leszczynski, said that radiation exposure from smartphones is much higher because of data traffic.

“Smartphone radiation exposures are much higher because of the data traffic. Even though one may not be using the phone all the time, there is continuous data flowing from Facebook and other apps such as weather, news update and so on that people have on their phones,”  Leszczynski said.

Leszczynski has played a very important roll in the world’s understanding of cell phone radiation health effects. He informed the audience that he was a part of the 31 scientists committee (IARC) constituted by the WHO and 26 scientists among them classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), because of links to phone radiation causing brain cancer with its long term use.

He made a point to tell people to not talk on a cellphone for more than a half an hour in day, he also discouraged them from keeping cell phones close to the body, even in a pocket and never near a pregnant woman’s belly.

Leszcznski added that it is very important that safety standards are revised and users should be informed of current scientific uncertainty and that much more research warranted in this field.

According to the expert, “current safety standards are insufficient”.

He isn’t alone on this assumption either,even the US Government Accountability Office pushed for the FCC to review RF exposure limits and SAR test requirements for cell phones.  See Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radio-frequency Exposure Limits and Policies” (Proceeding Number 13-84).

The FCC requires all cell phones sold in the USA must not exceed a maximum SAR of 1.6 watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.  Official FCC documents show 950 submissions — most calling for stronger safety regulation; Scientist and organizations have labeled SAR  as, “not being able to protect the public“,  from hazards now proven at non-thermal exposure levels.

The multitrillion dollar wireless industry is getting away with manipulating the scientific results of world class doctors, researchers and scientists!

  • Breaking News: Nokia Says Microsoft Must Handle Cell Phone Radiation Health Concerns September 16, 2014
  • Motorola War-Games Scientists Indicating Health Risk from Cell Phone Radiation September 12, 2014
  • MUST HEAR THIS Interview About Cell Phone Radiation Risk On Mobilize Documentary Premiere Night September 11, 2014
  • FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler Confronted Over Cell Phone Radiation In Silicon Valley (VIDEO)

 

 Implications of WHO/IARC classification that are not spoken aloud 

Following the IARC meeting, one would assume that the classification of cell phone radiation as a possible carcinogen would scientifically justify the need for more research and will lead to more research funding to help close the gaps in the knowledge.

But, nothing significant happened to the research effort. In fact, the industry considered the new classification as sort of a “clean bill of health” because cell phone radiation was not classified as a carcinogen, acting as if a possible carcinogen isn’t bad at all.

In summary, IARC classification:

  • justifies implementation of the Precautionary Principle
  • confirms existence of non-thermal effects that can cause health risk
  • indicate that current safety standards are insufficient to protect health of the users

The precautionary principle or precautionary approach states that if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus that the action or policy is not harmful, the burden of proof that it is not harmful falls on those taking an action.

Outcome of the IARC classification.

The IARC classification indicates that current safety standards are insufficient to protect a cell phone users health. Results obtained in the Interphone study and Hardell studies were obtained from people using regular cell phones that meet current safety standards.  In spite of meeting current safety standards, long-term avid use of these cell phones led to increased risk of cancer from cell phone radiation exposure at non-thermal levels.

It logically means that the current safety standards are insufficient because the amount of radiation emitted from cell phones in compliance with safety standards still causes increased health risk of developing cancer.

  • Tags
  • Cell Phone Cancer
  • Cell Phone Radiation
  • Cell Phone SAR
  • IARC
  • Leszczynski
Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest
Next article AUDIO: Very Informative Discussion on Cell Phone Radiation Health Hazards
Previous article Did Radiation From Cell Phones Cause UK's 100% Increase in Early Dementia Starting at 30

Related Posts

Holiday 2017 Warning: Don't Gift Wrap Brain Cancer! Smartphones, Kids and Cancer Cell Phone Radiation

Holiday 2017 Warning: Don't Gift Wrap Brain Cancer! Smartphones, Kids and Cancer

Nokia Says Microsoft Must Handle Cell Phone Radiation Health Concerns Cell Phone Radiation

Nokia Says Microsoft Must Handle Cell Phone Radiation Health Concerns

Cell Phone Radiation Awareness Campaign: Oman Case Study Cell Phone Radiation

Cell Phone Radiation Awareness Campaign: Oman Case Study

Research & Phone Specs Search
Recent Posts
  • First time ever, a Smartphone is recalled because of excessive levels of hazardous RF radiation
  • Not April Fools Day Joke “Clear Evidence of Cancer” from Cell Phone Radiation
  • 2018 First Clear Evidence Cell Phone Radiation Can Cause Cancer
  • Press Conference on Ramazzini Study Showing Cancer Cell Phone Radiation Link
  • The Smoking Gun Gets Another Bullet! Ramazzini Institute Cell Phone Cancer Study Abstract
Notable Quotes

“Cell phones cause cancer.” “It should become crystal clear that cell phones do cause cancer and that the American people are not being properly warned about cell phones.” “… do whatever it takes to warn everybody about keeping cell phones away from their bodies.”

RIP Jimmy Gonzalez (1972-2014)
Compare SAR Levels
  • Google Pixel 2 vs Google Pixel 2 XL Google Pixel 2 vs Google Pixel 2 XL View Comparison →
  • Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus View Comparison →
  • Apple iPhone 8 Plus vs Apple iPhone X SAR Levels Apple iPhone 8 Plus vs Apple iPhone X SAR Levels View Comparison →
  • Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus View Comparison →
  • Essential PH-1 vs Apple iPhone 7 Essential PH-1 vs Apple iPhone 7 View Comparison →
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 8 vs Apple iPhone 7 Plus Samsung Galaxy Note 8 vs Apple iPhone 7 Plus View Comparison →
SAR Levels

Compare SAR Levels

Alcatel Amoi Apple Asus BenQ BenQ-Siemens Bird BlackBerry Ericsson Eten Gigabyte Haier HP HTC Huawei i-mate i-mobile Innostream LG Maxon Micromax Mitsubishi Motorola NEC Nokia O2 Palm Panasonic Pantech Philips Qtek Sagem Samsung Sendo Sewon Sharp Siemens Sony Sony Ericsson T-Mobile Telit Toshiba VK Mobile Vodafone ZTE
  • HOME
  • My Account
  • Shop
  • Cart
  • Contact Us
  • Back to top
RF Safe™ and Peel-n-Shield™ are Trademarks of RF Safe Corporation
© RF Safe™ 1998-2017. Smartphone Radiation Safety Helpline: 844-473-7233