In a growing effort to protect children online, policymakers and consumer advocacy groups have been pushing for new safeguards against digital platforms that may worsen mental health issues for young users. However, federal efforts to pass children’s online safety protections have been stalled due to disagreements among House and Senate leaders. In response, state officials have rushed to fill the void with their own bills requiring tech companies to vet their products for risks to children before launching them. But these bills have faced broad opposition from tech trade groups, many of which are supported by big tech giants like Amazon, Google and Meta. These groups have deployed lobbyists to meet with key state officials, sent their leaders to testify in opposition to the efforts, and even fired off letters warning about the potentially catastrophic impact of the bills on user privacy and free speech online. Despite such opposition, supporters of the proposed legislation argue that these safeguards are necessary to prevent children from being exposed to addictive social media features and other harmful designs.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- EMF-The Dangers and How to Mitigate Risk December 4, 2025
- From Bell’s Photophone to the Light Age: How Wireless Took a Wrong Turn — and How We Correct It November 29, 2025
- The Clean Ether Light Age Roadmap November 29, 2025
- Clean Ether, TruthCase™ & the Light‑First Endgame November 29, 2025
- What people should understand about the science now November 29, 2025
- Black Friday TruthCase and important RF SAFE email update November 28, 2025
- The True Legacy of RF Safe as a Pioneer in EMF Safety Advocacy: Beyond Bias November 28, 2025
- Beyond Bias: The True Legacy of RF Safe as a Pioneer in EMF Safety Advocacy November 27, 2025
- Shadows in the Spectrum: The Ongoing Clash Between Light, Waves, and the Fight for Children’s Health November 27, 2025
- TruthCase™ by RF SAFE QuantaCase November 26, 2025
- Why the S4 Mito Spin Framework Demands Immediate Regulatory Overhaul: A Deep Dive into Non Thermal EMF Mechanisms November 26, 2025
- The Missing Physics: Non Thermal EMF Effects Through the Lens of the S4 Mito Spin Framework November 26, 2025
- Exposing the Overlooked Physics: Non Thermal EMF Effects and the S4 Mito Spin Framework in 2025 November 26, 2025
- Your Phone Is Turning Your Blood Into Pancakes: The 2025 EMF Wake-Up Call That’s About to Explode November 26, 2025
- Unpacking the S4–Mito–Spin Framework: Could This Be the Missing Piece in EMF Health Debates? November 26, 2025
- What Exactly Is S4-Mito-Spin? November 26, 2025
- HHS Is Breaking Federal Law Public Law 90-602 November 26, 2025
- THE INVISIBLE APOCALYPSE: How Non Thermal EMF Is Silently Destroying Humanity November 26, 2025
- THE CLEAN ETHER ACT: End the Silent Genocide of Non-Thermal EMF – Mandate LiFi NOW or Sacrifice Our Children to Corporate Lies November 26, 2025
- The S4–Mitochondria–Spin Framework: A Unified Theory of Non Thermal RF/ELF Biological Effects – Now Backed by Explosive 2025 Evidence That Demands Immediate Action November 26, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →

