Our Children—and Our Future—Depend on Action
If the FDA goes unpunished for ignoring the law and letting the NTP’s wireless radiation research fold right after finding clear evidence of cancer, if the FCC keeps pushing its outdated 1996 safety guidelines even though it failed a 2021 court order, and if Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 keeps muzzling local communities—violating both the First and Tenth Amendments—then part of the blame will fall on our collective silence.
But here’s the stark truth: cancer might actually be the least of our worries. Studies suggest serious neurological harm and developmental risks from chronic RF exposure—threats our children may carry for a lifetime.
That’s why we need MAGA (Make America Great Again) and MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) to come together and support our #TrumpRepeal704 campaign. Use that hashtag every day, post about it often, and always tag @realDonaldTrump. Remind him—and the entire nation—that no child should be collateral damage in a system that puts profit before public health.
Do it for our children.
Do it for America.
Let’s end this madness, reclaim local rights, and safeguard the health of the next generation. Silence is complicity, so let’s speak up, stand together, and #StopTheMadness today! #TrumpRepeal704
If your child or grandchildren don’t look you in the eyes, ask yourself: Why didn’t you speak up against the unconstitutional laws and the poisonous environment flooded with entropic waste? Not speaking up has consequences. Protect our children now!
A National Crisis Hiding in Plain Sight
Does it sound crazy to suggest that our own federal government might be contributing to a rise in developmental and neurological disorders in children? Before you dismiss it as a “conspiracy,” take a moment to look at the facts:
- Public Law 90-602, a 1968 mandate requiring the FDA to protect Americans from dangerous electronic product radiation, goes ignored.
- Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 strips local authorities of their power to oppose cell towers on health grounds.
- Outdated FCC guidelines from 1996 allow dangerously high microwave (RF) radiation levels that are forced on our children without recourse.
- Multiple scientific studies—Yale’s ADHD research on mice exposed to RFR, and Dr. Martin Pall’s findings on potential autism mechanisms—hint that unchecked wireless radiation could be fueling neurological issues.
It’s time to confront the horrifying possibility that these failures—these government-mandated exposures—may be a key factor in the explosion of conditions like ADHD, autism, and other developmental disorders. This blog will explain how we got here, what laws are in play, why they might be unconstitutional, and who can fix it: President Donald Trump.
Decoding the Laws—What Are They, and How Did They Get Here?
Public Law 90-602 (1968)
- What It Is: Also known as the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act, this law requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to research, regulate, and inform the public about electronic product radiation hazards (including RF radiation from cell phones, Wi-Fi, etc.).
- Why It Matters: The FDA is legally obligated to ensure Americans aren’t exposed to dangerous levels of radiation. If the FDA doesn’t follow this mandate, it’s breaking the law—no different than you or me ignoring a speed limit.
Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act (1996)
- What It Is: Signed by President Bill Clinton, Section 704 effectively preempts local governments from denying cell tower permits based on health or environmental concerns.
- Constitutional Question: By stripping local authorities of their right to consider health impacts, Section 704 violates:
- The First Amendment: Preventing communities from raising health concerns in public hearings is a direct assault on the right to petition the government.
- The Tenth Amendment: Traditionally, public health and zoning are local matters. Yet Section 704 places these decisions under federal control, trampling states’ rights.
How Are Such Laws Created?
- Drafted and Passed by Congress: Both the House and Senate must agree on the legislation.
- Signed by a President: Once signed, it becomes law.
- Assigned to Agencies: In this case, the FDA and FCC gained authority to regulate electronic radiation and telecom infrastructure.
How Can They Be Changed?
- Congressional Action: Congress can amend or repeal the law.
- Presidential Action: A president can push legislators to rewrite the law, issue executive orders, or appoint agency heads who prioritize public health.
The FDA’s Inaction—An Actual Violation of Law
Public Law 90-602 is not a polite suggestion; it’s a federal mandate. When you break a mandate (like a speed limit), there are consequences. The same should be true for the FDA. By neglecting to follow through on comprehensive research and public warnings regarding non-thermal RF radiation, the FDA is:
- Failing to enforce updated safety guidelines, ignoring new data such as the National Toxicology Program’s “clear evidence” of cancer from cell phone radiation.
- Neglecting its duty to “inform the public” about these hazards.
- Allowing the FCC to rely on archaic 1996 standards that only consider thermal effects (tissue heating), ignoring emerging science on neurological and developmental damage.
If we can get a speeding ticket for going over 55 mph, shouldn’t the FDA face consequences for ignoring a legal duty that affects millions of American children?
FCC Guidelines—Outdated, Dangerous, and Enforced at Gunpoint
Yes, “enforced at gunpoint” might sound hyperbolic, but consider this: Section 704 means that if local governments try to stop a cell tower due to health concerns, they face lawsuits and legal repercussions. It’s an unconstitutional stranglehold that:
- Ignores Non-Thermal Effects: The FCC’s standards date back to a pre-smartphone era. They do not account for long-term, low-level exposure typical of modern life.
- Forces Compliance: Parents who want to keep a tower away from their child’s school cannot succeed in any health-based protest.
This scenario literally “forces” these microwave exposures on the public, including children, who are known to have thinner skulls and more vulnerable, developing brains.
The Real-World Impact—Neurological Damage and Developmental Disorders
This isn’t speculation; peer-reviewed research connects RF exposure to potential neurological harm. For instance:
- Yale University ADHD Study: Research on mice exposed to RF radiation in utero showed increased hyperactivity and memory impairment—key markers of ADHD.
- Dr. Martin Pall’s Mechanisms: He has documented how RF-induced voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) disruption could be tied to autism-like behaviors, among other disorders.
Combine these findings with the meteoric rise in childhood developmental issues—autism spectrum disorders, ADHD, behavioral problems—and the picture becomes chilling. Could it be that this steady, 24/7 exposure to wireless radiation is a significant factor? Are we literally saturating our children’s brains with entropic waste from cradle to grave, as you say?
Before you call it crazy, realize that future generations might look back and ask: “Why didn’t anyone speak up?” If your grandchildren can’t hold your gaze due to neurological damage, the time to act is now—not after the damage is done.
How the Federal Government May Be Responsible
- FDA’s Legal Failure: By ignoring Public Law 90-602, the FDA is abdicating its core responsibility, letting harmful exposures continue unchecked.
- FCC’s Outmoded Standards: Despite losing a lawsuit in 2021 (brought by RFK Jr. and the Environmental Health Trust), the FCC still enforces 1996 guidelines.
- Section 704: This law crushes local autonomy and enforces national (and obsolete) RF standards, no matter the mounting scientific evidence of harm.
As a result, children—especially in schools near cell towers or constantly exposed to Wi-Fi—are put at risk of developmental and neurological harm. This might be the biggest silent health crisis of our time.
President Trump—Our Best (and Maybe Only) Hope
Presidents sign these laws into effect; only a President can drive the momentum to repeal or amend them. And that’s where President Trump comes in. Regardless of one’s political affiliation, the fact is:
- He has the power to push Congress to repeal Section 704, thus restoring local rights and allowing parents to protect their children.
- He can force agency heads at the FCC and FDA to comply with modern science, ensuring guidelines reflect current research on non-thermal RF effects.
- He can hold the FDA accountable for its blatant lawbreaking under Public Law 90-602.
Without presidential leadership, the bureaucratic machine will continue ignoring these red flags. So, #TrumpRepeal704 isn’t just a hashtag; it’s a clarion call for the highest office in the land to correct this dangerous status quo.
What You Can Do—Don’t Become Another Statistic
Parents, grandparents, citizens—this is your fight, too. Not speaking up has consequences. Every day you remain silent is a day your child or grandchild might be exposed to harmful levels of microwave radiation.
Action Steps:
- Raise Your Voice: Post on social media, call into local radio shows, write articles. Make #TrumpRepeal704, #StopTheMadness, and #ProtectOurChildren go viral.
- Contact President Trump: Demand he prioritize repealing Section 704, updating FCC guidelines, and holding the FDA to Public Law 90-602.
- Educate Your Community: Share research like Yale’s ADHD study and Dr. Pall’s findings. Let people know this isn’t tin-foil-hat speculation—it’s science.
- Support Further Research: Encourage local and national representatives to fund independent, large-scale RF studies. The National Toxicology Program was on the verge of revealing more truths before funding cuts.
Don’t Let Your Children or Grandchildren Pay the Price
We stand at a crossroads where unconstitutional laws, outdated regulations, and agency negligence converge, forcing excessive microwave exposures onto an unsuspecting public. The potential cost? Neurological and developmental harm that could haunt families for generations.
It’s time for each of us to ask: “If my grandchildren avoid eye contact or show signs of significant developmental delays, did I stand by while unconstitutional laws remained in place?” The mental image might be grim, but it’s the wake-up call we all need.
Be the voice that protects our children. Speak out against unconstitutional laws and environmental toxicity. And remember: if the FDA isn’t punished for ignoring the law, if the FCC remains stuck in 1996, and if Section 704 continues to muzzle local communities, the blame will lie, in part, with our collective silence.
You have a voice. Use it. Demand change. #TrumpRepeal704 #StopTheMadness #ProtectOurChildren
Sources & Further Reading
- Public Law 90-602 (Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968)
- Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 704
- Yale ADHD Study on Mice Exposed to RFR
- Research by Dr. Martin Pall on RF Radiation and Autism Mechanisms
- National Toxicology Program (NTP) Findings
- 2021 Court Ruling vs. FCC Brought by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. & Environmental Health Trust