Call or Text: +1 727-610-1188

Free worldwide shipping on all orders over $100.00

The Criminal Negligence of Ignoring EMF Dangers – Why Aren’t We Protecting Our Children?

Are you aware of the potential dangers lurking from the everyday wireless devices around you? Dive deep into the compelling world of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and their overlooked risks in our latest video. Uncover how outdated regulations from 1996 fail to protect us against the non-thermal effects of EMF exposure, such as DNA damage and increased cancer risks, especially in children whose developing bodies are more vulnerable.

Learn about the pressing need for modern safety standards that match current scientific understanding and how the telecom industry’s interests might be jeopardizing public health. Discover the U.S. Military’s RadioBio Initiative’s efforts to explore these non-thermal effects and why more civilian bodies aren’t involved.

This video is crucial for everyone, especially parents and caregivers, to understand the importance of updated EMF regulations and what can be done to push for changes. Educate yourself about the risks and join the movement towards safer technology usage.

Don’t forget to like and share this video to spread awareness!

#EMFSafety #WirelessRisks #PublicHealthAwareness #RadiationSafety #TechRegulations

I’m furious. And you should be too. In an age where information is at our fingertips, the negligence around the safety of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from wireless devices is criminal. We are living in a world increasingly saturated with EMFs from smartphones, tablets, Wi-Fi routers, and countless other wireless technologies. Yet, the public remains largely ignorant, and our regulatory bodies are woefully outdated and ineffective.

Let’s face it: the science is clear. There is a substantial body of research indicating potential health risks associated with EMF exposure, particularly for our children. Major studies like the Interphone study, Hardell group studies, CERENAT study, U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), Ramazzini Institute Study, REFLEX Project, BioInitiative Report, and the meticulous work of researchers like Dr. Henry Lai have collectively pointed towards an increased health risk from cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation. But where is the public outcry? Where are the updated regulations to protect us?

The Outdated Standards

The FCC’s safety standards for RF radiation, established in 1996, are beyond archaic. Let that sink in. These guidelines were set when cell phones were the size of bricks and the internet was still dial-up. They only consider the thermal effects of radiation, the outdated notion that EMF can only harm us if it heats our tissues. This is akin to saying that cigarettes are safe because they don’t give you a fever. The reality is far more complex and sinister.

Mounting Evidence of Non-Thermal Effects

Science evolves, and so should our understanding of risks. Research has increasingly shown that non-ionizing RF radiation can have biological effects beyond heating. DNA damage, oxidative stress, and changes in gene expression occur at levels that do not cause significant temperature increases. Yet, our regulations remain rooted in the past, ignoring these non-thermal effects.

The Silent Epidemic

One of the most alarming aspects is the impact on children. Children’s bodies are still developing, their skulls are thinner, and their brains are more susceptible to radiation. Despite this, children are using smartphones and tablets at younger and younger ages, exposing them to radiation levels that could be causing long-term harm. Studies have shown correlations between EMF exposure and increased risks of cancer, neurological disorders, and cognitive impairments. Yet, parents remain largely unaware, and those who do know are often ridiculed as alarmists.

The Lack of Public Awareness

Why isn’t this front-page news? Why aren’t we having national debates about EMF safety? The simple answer is a lack of public awareness and a pervasive apathy towards updating safety standards. The telecom industry, much like Big Tobacco in the past, has a vested interest in downplaying risks. They’ve successfully lobbied to keep outdated safety standards in place, all while rolling out more powerful and pervasive wireless technologies.

The RadioBio Initiative: A Glimmer of Hope

There are glimmers of hope, such as the U.S. Military’s RadioBio Initiative, which explores non-thermal effects of RF radiation and aims to understand electromagnetic signaling between biological systems. This initiative acknowledges that there is more to understand about how these frequencies interact with biological systems, suggesting that our current understanding is woefully incomplete. But why does it take the military to push this forward? Where are the civilian authorities? Where is the FDA, the CDC, or any public health body in addressing these concerns?

The Unforgivable Neglect

The neglect of this issue is unforgivable. We are failing our children by not taking decisive action to understand and mitigate the risks of EMF exposure. This isn’t just about a lack of regulation; it’s about a failure of responsibility. We need updated safety standards based on current science, we need public awareness campaigns to educate parents and caregivers, and we need ongoing research to continuously evaluate and address the risks.

Evolution of Understanding in Science

Science, by its very nature, is an evolving discipline. Historical shifts in scientific understanding, such as the transition from a geocentric to a heliocentric model of the solar system, highlight how new evidence can overturn long-standing beliefs. Similarly, the persistent belief that non-ionizing radiation poses no harm other than through heating is being reconsidered in light of emerging research. Refusing to acknowledge the mounting evidence of non-thermal effects of RF radiation can be likened to holding onto outdated scientific beliefs, such as the flat Earth theory or the geocentric model. Just as these ideas were eventually replaced by more accurate understandings, the notion that non-ionizing radiation’s only impact is thermal is facing a similar reassessment. Stubbornly clinging to outdated views in the face of new evidence does not align with the principles of scientific inquiry and progress.

The Call to Action

Enough is enough. We need to demand action. We need to lobby our lawmakers, pressure regulatory bodies, and hold the telecom industry accountable. We need to educate ourselves and others about the potential dangers of EMF exposure, especially for our children. It’s time to push back against the complacency and demand the protection we deserve.

It’s not just about living in a wireless world; it’s about living in a safe one. Let’s not wait for more evidence of harm to accumulate while we sit idly by. The time for action is now. For the sake of our children and future generations, let’s make EMF safety a priority and ensure that our technological advancements do not come at the cost of our health.

Wake up, world. It’s time to act.

Free Worldwide shipping

On all orders above $100

Easy 30 days returns

30 days money back guarantee

Replacement Warranty

Best replacement warranty in the business

100% Secure Checkout

AMX / MasterCard / Visa