For the first time a World Health Organization-commissioned team has rated the evidence that radio-frequency (RF) radiation causes cancer in laboratory animals as “high certainty.” The 75-page systematic review, published April 25 in Environment International, examined 52 well-controlled animal studies and found robust associations with two rare tumours also seen in long-term cell-phone users: malignant
From Spark to Shrapnel “I do not think that the wireless waves I have discovered will have any practical application.”— Heinrich Hertz, letter to his parents, 1889 In 1887 Heinrich Hertz proved Maxwell’s field equations by making sparks leap a di-electric gap. Eight years later he died—aged 36—of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), a rare autoimmune
Empathy in the Cross-Fire From Heinrich Hertz’s first spark-gap discharges in the 1880s to the omnipresent 5 G/I-o-T cloud of 2025, engineered radio-frequency (RF) energy has risen from zero to an all-pervasive, round-the-clock background. A century and a half of accumulated evidence—medical case reports, epidemiology, animal studies, crime statistics, and psychometric meta-analyses—shows a parallel collapse
The Unauthorized History of Wireless—from Hertz’s Spark-Gap to Section 704, and the Children We Sacrificed Along the Way In 1886 Heinrich Hertz touched copper to copper and created the first non-natural radio burst. In 2025 a seven-year-old girl in Florida sits 465 feet from a 5 G tower that her parents are legally forbidden to
How Heinrich Hertz’s unexplained death foreshadowed a century of policy-driven child endangerment—and how Section 704 keeps the carnage legal The Spark That Sickened a Genius In the winter of 1886, a 29-year-old physicist named Heinrich Hertz bent over a brass spark-gap and fired the first deliberate radio waves across a lab bench in Karlsruhe. Over
How an obscure 62-word clause (Section 704) turned the FCC into America’s most dangerous child-trafficking ring. The FCC traffics the health of our children – to externalize the cost of selling unsafe parts of nature’s EM spectrum onto your children’s health for shareholder profits, while the children sit in their homes and schools. Prologue 465
The gravest danger to America’s children is not the silicon and antennas inside their phones and tablets—it is the policy, unconstitutional laws created in Washington, D.C. A succession of White House administrations, beginning in 1996, handed over the public-interest reins to the wireless lobby. The resulting regulatory black hole has allowed radio-frequency (RF) emissions to
“Nothing, I guess.” — Heinrich Hertz, when asked what use his waves might have Heinrich Hertz is immortalised in every hertz counted by the gadgets around us, yet the father of radio died before he grasped the most profound implication of his work: by “plucking” invisible waves he had laced the natural electromagnetic habitat of
Year Hertz’s age Laboratory milestone Contemporary letters/diary notes Health status (modern interpretation) 1886 29 Builds spark-gap loop transmitter/receiver in Karlsruhe; first laboratory production & detection of radio (“Hertzian”) waves National MagLab – MagLab – Fit and active 1887 30 Measures wavelength & confirms waves travel at light-speed Wikipedia – Still healthy 1888 31 Demonstrates reflection,
Did the father of wireless technology also suffer its first fatal side-effects? Prologue – Genius meets an invisible foe Hertz’s legacy. Between 1886-1892 Heinrich Rudolf Hertz turned Maxwell’s equations into laboratory reality, making every “hertz” on a spec-sheet an homage to him. His demise. On 1 January 1894, aged 36, Hertz died of a brutal
Prologue: A Genius, a Mystery, and a Statistical Impossibility Heinrich Rudolf Hertz (1857-1894) verified James Clerk Maxwell’s prediction that electricity and magnetism travel as waves. Every “hertz” on your Wi-Fi router honours him. Yet the man who proved radio waves died at 36 from granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA)—a disease so rare that modern incidence hovers
What the new Panagopoulos et al. (2025) paper means for public‑health policy, tech design – and your everyday life Why this paper matters On 21 April 2025, Frontiers in Physiology provisionally accepted a landmark review titled “A Comprehensive Mechanism of Biological and Health Effects of Anthropogenic Extremely Low Frequency and Wireless‑Communication Electromagnetic Fields.” Authored by an international team led by biophysicist Dimitris J. Panagopoulos, the article
Historical Context: Section 704 and the FCC’s 1996 Guidelines In 1996, Congress passed the Telecommunications Act—an overhaul of telecom law heavily shaped by industry lobbying. Buried in this law was Section 704, a provision with far-reaching effects on wireless infrastructure. Section 704 of the Act explicitly prohibits state and local governments from regulating wireless tower placements based on
Wireless communications have become ubiquitous – from cell phones and Wi-Fi to smart appliances and 5G towers – bathing our environment in radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Official assurances of safety rest on outdated assumptions that only tissue heating (thermal effects) matter. Yet for decades, scientists have reported non-thermal biological impacts of low-level EMFs on
In a society obsessed with convenience and connectivity, a silent war is raging—one fought not with bullets or bombs, but with invisible waves. For those suffering from electrohypersensitivity (EHS), this war is personal. But beyond their suffering lies a broader truth: our children, our communities, and our constitutional rights are under attack by a corporate
Public Law 90-602 (Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968) What the Law Requires: Enacted in 1968, Public Law 90-602 amended the Public Health Service Act to ensure public health protection from electronic product radiation, including non-ionizing radiation en.wikipedia.org fda.gov. It mandated that the federal government establish an ongoing program to develop and enforce
A March 2025 Bioengineering paper documents a painstakingly‑controlled 1.8 GHz exposure system that tips the redox balance of human HEK‑293 cells at power densities five‑to‑six orders of magnitude below today’s public limits. The authors link single, 15‑minute fields to acute modulation of oxidative‑stress genes, following a U‑shaped (hormetic) dose–response. These findings land at the centre of a
On a humid spring morning in 1976, two Army medical analysts turned in a 36‑page monograph to the Defense Intelligence Agency. Its title was as dry as any bureaucratic dispatch—“Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) – Eurasian Communist Countries.” Yet the contents were anything but banal. Page after page catalogued Soviet‑bloc experiments in which low‑level microwave beams altered blood chemistry,
Effects on Fetuses Mobile Phone Use During Pregnancy: Which Association With Fetal Growth?Boileau, N., et al. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction 49(8):101852. (2020)URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32623065/ Mother’s Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields Before and During Pregnancy is Associated with Risk of Speech Problems in Offspring.Zarei, S., et al. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 9(1):61-68. (2019)URL:
From heart rate variability to full-on myocardial damage, the cardiovascular system bears the brunt of wireless radiation more than most people realize. These studies below don’t sugarcoat it: whether it’s 2G, 5G, or just your run-of-the-mill Wi-Fi router, electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can mess with your heart. Cell Phone Exposure Lowers Heart Rate Variability in Normal-Weight
Stop tiptoeing around it—wireless radiation goes way beyond a mild headache. From messing with memory to impairing learning and jacking up anxiety-like behaviors, these studies expose how our devices can reshape neural functions. Here’s the unvarnished evidence. Early-Life Exposure to Pulsed LTE Radiofrequency Fields Causes Persistent Changes in Activity and Behavior in C57BL/6 J Mice
Corporations keep feeding the public the same tired line: “Cell phone radiation isn’t harmful—unless it heats you.” Meanwhile, a growing stack of independent studies shows the exact opposite: non-thermal levels of radiofrequency (RF) radiation can break DNA strands, mess with your genes, and disrupt critical cellular functions. Below are the heavy-hitting studies that rip the
Some people keep parroting, “There’s no evidence that RF radiation causes cancer.” Meanwhile, real scientists around the world have sounded the alarm, linking wireless exposure not just to brain tumors, but also to colon, rectal, and even breast cancers. The studies below tear the corporate cover story to shreds—none of this is speculation, it’s documented
The studies below don’t mince words: wireless radiation—especially from mobile and cordless phones—has repeatedly been associated with malignant and benign brain tumors. If you’re tired of the corporate-driven narrative that ‘there’s no solid evidence,’ then read on. This is the brutal truth, straight from independent research that regulators keep ignoring. Simulation of the Incidence of
Among the many health concerns associated with radiofrequency (RF) radiation, the risk of brain tumors stands out due to the potentially severe consequences. Below, we explore key independent studies and reports that investigate whether long-term or high-intensity exposures—such as those from cell phones, cordless phones, and other wireless devices—may elevate the risk of developing malignant
Independent Science on the Effects of Wireless Radiation on Human Health and the Environment There are more than 1,000 scientific studies conducted by independent researchers from around the world concerning the biological effects of Radiofrequency (RF radiation). Here we present some of the most recent studies. I. Effects on Fetuses Mobile Phone Use During Pregnancy:
As wireless technologies permeate every aspect of modern life, the convenience of connectivity comes with hidden costs. Independent scientific research spanning decades and thousands of studies has consistently revealed concerning biological effects associated with exposure to Radiofrequency (RF) radiation from wireless devices. These studies, conducted globally by researchers without industry ties, challenge the telecom industry’s
Historical Context & Regulatory Capture Industry Influence on FCC Policies: The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has long been subject to “regulatory capture” by the telecom industry. The Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association (CTIA) – the wireless industry’s lobbying arm – has deeply influenced FCC decisions through a revolving door of personnel and lobbying. For
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
