In a growing effort to protect children online, policymakers and consumer advocacy groups have been pushing for new safeguards against digital platforms that may worsen mental health issues for young users. However, federal efforts to pass children’s online safety protections have been stalled due to disagreements among House and Senate leaders. In response, state officials have rushed to fill the void with their own bills requiring tech companies to vet their products for risks to children before launching them. But these bills have faced broad opposition from tech trade groups, many of which are supported by big tech giants like Amazon, Google and Meta. These groups have deployed lobbyists to meet with key state officials, sent their leaders to testify in opposition to the efforts, and even fired off letters warning about the potentially catastrophic impact of the bills on user privacy and free speech online. Despite such opposition, supporters of the proposed legislation argue that these safeguards are necessary to prevent children from being exposed to addictive social media features and other harmful designs.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- A Bold Step Towards a Healthier Childhood: Barnet Council’s Landmark Smartphone Ban February 15, 2025
- Trump’s Executive Order Finally Mentions Wireless Radiation: What It Means for Childhood Chronic Disease Research February 15, 2025
- Unmasking the Grand Wireless Conspiracy February 15, 2025
- Exposing the Grand Wireless Deception: Section 704, FCC Fraud, and a Fight for Our Future February 15, 2025
- The Grand Wireless Conspiracy: How 1996 Changed America’s Health Forever February 15, 2025
- Divine Convergence: Trump, RFK Jr., and the Battle to Expose Wireless Radiation Risks February 14, 2025
- How One Father’s Tragedy Uncovered Unconstitutional Laws, Illegitimate FCC Guidelines, and Suppression of Science That Sparked a Public Health Crisis February 14, 2025
- Unmasking the Grand Wireless Conspiracy: How 1996 Changed America’s Health Forever February 14, 2025
- How Illegitimate FCC Guidelines and Unconstitutional Laws Sparked a Public Health Crisis February 14, 2025
- Unveiling the Trifecta of Deception: How 1996 Marked a Public Health Crisis February 14, 2025
- RFK Jr. and Brendan Carr: Two Divergent Paths on RF Radiation Safety February 14, 2025
- When HHS Clashes with the FCC: RFK Jr., Brendan Carr, and the Battle Over Wireless Safety February 14, 2025
- The Future of Wireless Under RFK Jr. as HHS: A Bold Shift in U.S. Health and Technology Policy February 14, 2025
- A Closer Look at the Make America Healthy Again Commission – Executive Order: What It Means for Chronic Disease and EMF Research February 13, 2025
- France’s Proactive Approach to Wireless Radiation—and What It Means for U.S. Policy Under RFK Jr. February 13, 2025
- Exposing the Conspiracy: How Wireless Industry Collusion Endangered Public Health February 13, 2025
- HHS RFK Jr = The Wireless Industry’s House of Cards Is About to Collapse February 13, 2025
- Rewriting the Rules: RFK Jr., the Telecom Industry, and the Coming Revolution in Wireless Safety February 13, 2025
- Senate confirms Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) February 13, 2025
- Terahertz Frontiers: Unveiling the Hidden Dialogue Between T-rays and Human Melanoma Cells February 13, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →