In a growing effort to protect children online, policymakers and consumer advocacy groups have been pushing for new safeguards against digital platforms that may worsen mental health issues for young users. However, federal efforts to pass children’s online safety protections have been stalled due to disagreements among House and Senate leaders. In response, state officials have rushed to fill the void with their own bills requiring tech companies to vet their products for risks to children before launching them. But these bills have faced broad opposition from tech trade groups, many of which are supported by big tech giants like Amazon, Google and Meta. These groups have deployed lobbyists to meet with key state officials, sent their leaders to testify in opposition to the efforts, and even fired off letters warning about the potentially catastrophic impact of the bills on user privacy and free speech online. Despite such opposition, supporters of the proposed legislation argue that these safeguards are necessary to prevent children from being exposed to addictive social media features and other harmful designs.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- Urgent Request for Criminal Investigation and Seizure of Illegally Collected Data By EMF Hazards Summit 2025 April 6, 2025
- Exposing the EMF Hazards Summit 2025 Scam: Stop Exploiting Americans April 6, 2025
- The Missing Current: Supporting Michael Levin While Calling for a Broader View on EMFs April 5, 2025
- The Schumann Resonance and Human Health: Understanding Our Ancient Electromagnetic Sensory System April 5, 2025
- A Convergence of Calm: Why the Brain’s Alpha Rhythm May Be Proof of Electromagnetic Adaptation April 4, 2025
- The Schumann Resonance: Earth’s Natural Electromagnetic Symphony April 4, 2025
- Wireless Radiation: Regulatory vs Scientific Consensus April 4, 2025
- Why Moving Beyond Traditional Wi-Fi to Li-Fi Technology is the Future April 4, 2025
- Why So Many “Anti-Radiation” Phone Cases Get It Wrong—and How to Spot a Real Solution April 4, 2025
- Cell Phone Radiofrequency – NTP Board of Scientific Counselors Meeting – NIEHS April 3, 2025
- Melanie AI and the Future of Safe Learning: A New Model for Education Without Radiation April 2, 2025
- Melanie AI: A Fun Geometry Game with a Vital Warning for Parents April 2, 2025
- Exposing the Truth: The Fight Against Microwave Radiation and the Erosion of Our Rights April 2, 2025
- Life’s Hidden Code: How Bioelectrical Interfaces Are Revolutionizing Medicine April 2, 2025
- A Massive Problem All of Physics Completely Missed April 1, 2025
- The Radiation Lie: Why Your Phone Case Isn’t Enough and What You Must Do Now March 31, 2025
- You Can’t Buy Protection from a Lie March 31, 2025
- The Truth They Tried to Bury — But You’re Looking at It Now March 31, 2025
- If You Bought a “99% Protection” Case, Throw It in the Trash March 31, 2025
- A Father’s Promise: Why I Founded RF Safe and Why the Fight Isn’t Over March 30, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →