In this article, we delve into the fascinating and controversial theory of Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, who believes that memory is an inherent property of nature. Dr. Sheldrake has spent the last forty years of his career investigating slippery, esoteric phenomena, and we explore his findings in detail. We also examine the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to exhibit true consciousness, a topic that has sparked lively debate in recent years. While Dr. Sheldrake is skeptical of AI’s ability to truly replicate human consciousness, there are engineers who claim that these systems are already capable of exhibiting true intelligence and consciousness. However, understanding the limitations of AI is crucial when discussing this topic. We examine the differences between digital, analog, and quantum computing, and explore why some experts believe that analog and quantum computing systems may hold more promise for achieving true consciousness. Finally, we offer insights from an engineer who has developed technology highly dependent on AI. John Coates explains how setting the temperature of the model simulates probabilistic processes in these digital AI systems to exhibit true intelligence consciousness. By exploring diverse perspectives on this complex topic, we hope to offer readers a more nuanced understanding of the potential and limitations of AI and the nature of consciousness itself.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- The Invisible Condition—Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) March 18, 2025
- Critical Errors Undermine WHO’s Assurance on Cell Phone Safety March 17, 2025
- In the Shadow of the Tower: How Regulatory Capture Endangers America’s Children March 17, 2025
- Childhood Cancer and the Hidden Risk March 17, 2025
- Reversing Telecom Regulatory Capture: Restoring Public Health Protections in Wireless Policy March 16, 2025
- Undoing 30 Years of Telecom Deception: Exposing the Revolving Door and Restoring Public Health March 16, 2025
- Smartphones at Night: An Unseen Risk for Women with Hereditary Breast Cancer March 16, 2025
- RF Safe’s Quest for Safer Wireless: John Coates’ Journey from Loss to Innovation March 15, 2025
- Pioneering Safe Wireless Communication: From Interferometry to Li-Fi with John Coates March 15, 2025
- The Collision of Wireless Technology and Human Biology: Insights from Dr. Paul Héroux and ICBE-EMF March 15, 2025
- Public Law 90-602 The Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968 March 13, 2025
- Electrohypersensitivity (EHS) Risks from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Heightened Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) in Children and Adolescents March 12, 2025
- Metabolic Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Sleep Disruption Risks from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Oxidative Stress and Chronic Inflammation from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Neuropsychiatric Risks Associated with Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Auditory and Visual Risks Associated with Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Environmental and Ecological Impacts of Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Endocrine System Disruption from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →