In this article, we delve into the fascinating and controversial theory of Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, who believes that memory is an inherent property of nature. Dr. Sheldrake has spent the last forty years of his career investigating slippery, esoteric phenomena, and we explore his findings in detail. We also examine the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to exhibit true consciousness, a topic that has sparked lively debate in recent years. While Dr. Sheldrake is skeptical of AI’s ability to truly replicate human consciousness, there are engineers who claim that these systems are already capable of exhibiting true intelligence and consciousness. However, understanding the limitations of AI is crucial when discussing this topic. We examine the differences between digital, analog, and quantum computing, and explore why some experts believe that analog and quantum computing systems may hold more promise for achieving true consciousness. Finally, we offer insights from an engineer who has developed technology highly dependent on AI. John Coates explains how setting the temperature of the model simulates probabilistic processes in these digital AI systems to exhibit true intelligence consciousness. By exploring diverse perspectives on this complex topic, we hope to offer readers a more nuanced understanding of the potential and limitations of AI and the nature of consciousness itself.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- Truth Hertz: The Metabolic Poison Hidden in Plain Sight June 13, 2025
- Why EMFs —not Just Light or Food—Are the Real Metabolic Poison June 13, 2025
- 🌟 Clean Ether, Healthy Future: Why LiFi Must Replace Microwaves June 12, 2025
- Why Light Is the Safer Choice: A Reply to Sun Activist Concerns About LiFi vs. RF/Microwave June 12, 2025
- The Real EMF Science, the Precautionary Principle, and the Case for LiFi June 12, 2025
- How 140 Years of RF “Technobolic Waste” May Have Re‑Wired the Human Social Brain June 12, 2025
- From Electromagnetic Eden to Empathy Collapse June 12, 2025
- Empathy on the Brink June 12, 2025
- QuantaCase™ – Educating Consumers for True Radiation Safety June 12, 2025
- QuantaCase™ Anti-Radiation Phone Case – Engineered for Maximum Safety and Performance June 12, 2025
- The Only Anti-Radiation Case Built to Expose and Correct Industry Flaws June 12, 2025
- How QuantaCase™ fixes every flaw that makes other ‘EMF‑blocking’ cases dangerous. June 12, 2025
- Why RF Safe Makes a Case—and why “prudent avoidance” is the only honest strategy June 11, 2025
- Mitochondria, Kidneys, and the Real Danger of Wireless Radiation: Why the Latest Science Demands a Total Rethink on RF Safety June 11, 2025
- Wi-Fi, Kidneys, and the Human Cost of Ignoring RF Science June 11, 2025
- How Phone Companies Quietly Moved Antennas and Made Your Thyroid the New Radiation Target June 11, 2025
- The Hidden Risk: How Antenna Relocation Turned Our Necks—and Thyroids—into the New Radiation Hotspots June 11, 2025
- Gene Expression, the Electromagnetic Age, and the Future of Human Health: A Comprehensive Guide for Parents, Policymakers, and Citizens June 11, 2025
- RF Radiation, the Developing Brain, and the Transgenerational Risk: Lessons from the Yale ADHD Study June 11, 2025
- RF Entropic Waste and the Social Brain: From Molecular Noise to Global Unrest June 10, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →