• RF Safe Blog
    • Cell Phone Radiation
    • Conventional UVC
    • Far-UVC Radiation
    • Glossary
  • SAR Levels
    • Specific Absorption Rate
    • What is RF Radiation?
  • Apple Safety
  • Samsung Safety
  • RF Safe Headsets
    • Stereo Air Tube Headset
    • Mono Air Tube Headset
    • RF Safe Ferrite Beads
  • My Account
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    • View Shopping Cart
    • Secure Checkout
    • Warranty Coverage
    • Order Tracking
    • Resend Password
RF (Radio Frequency) Safe
  • January 25th, 2021
RF (Radio Frequency) Safe
  • RF Safe Blog
    • Cell Phone Radiation
    • Conventional UVC
    • Far-UVC Radiation
    • Glossary
  • SAR Levels
    • Specific Absorption Rate
    • What is RF Radiation?
  • Apple Safety
  • Samsung Safety
  • RF Safe Headsets
    • Stereo Air Tube Headset
    • Mono Air Tube Headset
    • RF Safe Ferrite Beads
  • My Account
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    • View Shopping Cart
    • Secure Checkout
    • Warranty Coverage
    • Order Tracking
    • Resend Password
Home
Cell Phone Radiation

Cancer expert says science merits need to reclassify phone radiation as a “Group 1 carcinogenic to humans”

Cell Phone Radiation

Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest

iarc+group+1+carcinogenic+to+humansAn expert cancer researcher and advisor to the World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO/IARC) has issued his scientific opinion that radio-frequency (RF) radiation from any source – such as the signals emitted by cell phones, other wireless and cordless and sensor devices, and wireless networks – fully meets criteria to be classified as a “Group 1 carcinogenic to humans” agent, based on scientific evidence associating RF exposure to cancer development and cancer promotion.

“The evidence indicating wireless is carcinogenic has increased and can no longer be ignored,” stated Dr. Anthony B. Miller at a July 31, 2017, lecture in Jackson Hole, Wyoming sponsored by the Environmental Health Trust where international experts presented the best available science on “cell phone and wireless radiation”.

In 2011, WHO/IARC classified RF radiation from any source as a “Group 2B possibly carcinogenic to human” agent.   Miller believes the evidence published since 2011 fulfills the requirements to re-classify RF radiation as a “Group 1 carcinogenic to humans” agent.

Miller explained that the basis for his opinion includes recent scientific publications which include the 2017 re-analysis of data from the Interphone study, the 2014 French National CERENAT Study, several new publications on Swedish cancer data, and the 2016 results of the National Toxicology Program.

Dr. Anthony B. Miller is a physician epidemiologist who specializes in cancer etiology, prevention, and screening. Miller is Professor Emeritus at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health of the University of Toronto and Senior Medical Advisor to the Environmental Health Trust.

He has been a longtime advisor to the World Health Organization (WHO) and was Senior Epidemiologist for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).

He served as Director of the Epidemiology Unit of the National Cancer Institute of Canada, Chair of the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics at the University of Toronto, Head of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology at the German Cancer Research Centre, and Consultant to the Division of Cancer Prevention of the U.S. National Cancer Institute.

He has performed research about electromagnetic fields and cancer and has served on many committees assessing the carcinogenicity of various exposures. Miller was visiting Senior Scientist in the IARC Monographs programme as a reviewer to the scientific literature supporting a designation of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) as a Group 2B possible carcinogen in 2011.

Other experts agree that the increased evidence now establishes RF radiation as a human carcinogen. For example, researchers Dr. Lennart Hardell and Michael Carlberg have published several epidemiological studies that found increased brain cancer associated with long-term cell phone use and conclude that “RF radiation should be regarded as a human carcinogen causing glioma.”

In addition, published epidemiological research has also found persons diagnosed with brain cancer had decreased survival rates associated with higher wireless phone use.

In response to skeptics who claim, “There is no evidence,” researchers point to published research that has consistently found increased cancer risk in well-designed case-control studies that have looked at persons who used cell phones for more than ten years.

On July 31, 2017, panel presentation included international experts. Dr. Annie Sasco presented the WHO/IARC process used to classify carcinogenic agents.

Dr. Devra Davis presented research finding wireless radiation results in sperm damage and altered brain development. Dr. Moe Mellion presented

Dr. Iris Udasin’s clinical cases of World Trade Center first responders who developed brain cancer after combined environmental exposures to chemical toxins and wireless radiation.

Theodora Scarato, MSW presented policies enacted by governments worldwide to reduce RF radiation exposures.

Dr. Marc Arazi presented data released by the cell phone radiation test program of the Government of France, which found that when cell phones are tested in body contact positions, RF radiation exposure exceeds regulatory limits.

Environmental Health Trust plans to post all lectures and videos from the July 31, 2017, presentation online.

View and Download Dr. Anthony Miller’s July 31, 2017, Presentation from the Symposium

Scientific Publications on Cell Phone Radiation and Cancer Referenced in Dr. Miller’s Presentation

Watch this excerpt from Dr. Anthony Miller’s lecture on July 31, 2017

Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest
Next article Wireless Industry admits it's likely cell phone radiation warnings will be seen all across the country
Previous article RF Safe F-Series vs G-Series Phone Radiation Cases
Research & Phone Specs Search
Cart
REMEMBERING CORONAVIRUS VICTIMS
Timeline
Jan 9th 6:18 AM
Cell Phone Radiation

RF Safe Code of Ethics for Manufacturers

Sep 7th 10:35 PM
Cell Phone Radiation

Labor Day- (We are nothing without the people that made us a great company) -Help Wanted –

Jul 13th 2:16 AM
Conventional UVC

QuantaDose™ UVC Indicator UV Dosimeter UVC Light Test Card

May 28th 5:39 AM
Cell Phone Radiation

Apple Claims Federal Regulations Bar iPhone Radiation Safety Suit

Apr 24th 3:03 PM
Imminent Danger Alerts

Coronavirus Tracker USA

Apr 3rd 5:28 AM
Imminent Danger Alerts

FDA Said It Will Stop Blocking Imports Of KN95 Mask, But What Spooked China?

Mar 31st 4:25 AM
Imminent Danger Alerts

Unwarranted FDA KN95 Mask Restrictions Could Lead To Killing Doctors, Front-line Workers and Old!

Mar 13th 5:35 AM
Far-UVC

WAR On Coronavirus: Human-safe Far-UVC Sterilization Project

Mar 2nd 6:03 AM
Far-UVC

Coronavirus COVID-19 can live on Smartphones Screens up to 4 Days

Mar 1st 6:39 PM
Far-UVC

207-222 nm Far-UVC Light Can Slow Spread Of Novel Coronavirus COVID-19

  • HOME
  • My Account
  • Shop
  • Cart
  • Contact Us
  • Back to top
RF Safe™ and Peel-n-Shield™ are Trademarks of RF Safe Corporation
© RF Safe™ 1998-2020. Smartphone Radiation Safety Helpline: 1 (844) 473-7233