Huawei Nexus 6P Radiation Levels
You must be an administrator to clone products.
Display
1.49 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body)
Camera
3 GB
Hardware
32/64/128 GB
Storage
~71.4% screen-to-body ratio
Battery
12.3 MP, f/2.0, laser autofocus, dual-LED (dual tone) flash
OS
Android OS, v6.0 (Marshmallow)
Huawei Nexus 6P - SAR Levels
FCC SAR Levels
- US SAR Ratings USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg 1.49 W/kg
- Head SAR Level SAR test when held against your head when only using cellular service. Wifi and other transmitter are NOT active 0.81 W/kg
EU SAR Level
- Head SAR Level 1.17 W/kg
- Body SAR Level 0.54 W/kg
Related
Huawei Nexus 6P - QuantaCase™
Huawei Nexus 6P - FCC SAR Report Image
Huawei Nexus 6P - Videos
Huawei Nexus 6P - Offers
SAR Links
Search Archives
Recent Posts
- You Can Rebuild the Engine and Still Lose the Timing
- When the Perfect Engine Still Fails: Bioelectric Fidelity, Autoimmune Drift, the Meta-Disease State
- The Boundary Layer Null: Why the Japan Korea RF Rat Studies Do Not Rebut NTP
- The Embodied Cellular Transfer Function
- The Mechanism Excuse Is Running Out
- Times of India and Medical Xpress Declared the RF Debate Over. WHO Has Not.
- Ladera Ranch and the Case for Investigating Low-Fidelity Biology
- The next FDA confirmation is the public’s opportunity
- How RF Radiation Creates Low-Fidelity Biology, Bioelectrical Dissonance, and a Meta-Disease State
- Public Law 90-602 Is Not a “Rabbit Hole”: HHS Must Show Its Work on Wireless Radiation
- Regulatory capture has a history
- Why the NTP response space remains substantially untested
- Low-Fidelity Biology, Entropic Waste, and the End of the One Disease/One Cause Safety Model
- The Regulatory Narrative Is Breaking From the Inside
- The Clean Ether Act: Ending the Geocentric Age of Wireless Safety
- The Clean Ether Act: From Biological Dissonance to Biologically Aligned Wireless
- The De Facto Standard Is Not the Truth
- ELF EMF, RF, and the case for “low-fidelity biology”
- The Cell Does Not Just Respond to the Environment. It Interprets It.
- The Folate Gate
- Why EMFs May Not Map Cleanly to One Disease — and Why That Is the Point
- Why Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act Must Be Repealed
- The Biology Did Not Simply Break. It Lost Fidelity.
- Recipe Book vs. Smartphone: Why This “Caregiver Phone Study” is Laughably Absurd – They’re Scaring Us About Normal Mom Moments While Hiding the Real Radiation Danger to Kids
- Even Therapeutic Pulsed RF Proves the Point We’ve Made for 28 Years: RF Signals Interact with Human Biology in Complex, Non-Thermal Ways — So Why Are We Still Pretending Everyday Wireless Exposure Is Automatically ‘Safe’?
- Microwaves Are Moving Molecules Inside Cells — and Regulators Are Still Pretending Heat Is the Only Issue
- Why Pulsed Wireless Radiation Demands a Regulatory Reckoning
- The EMF Causal Chain: Why the New Frontiers Editorial Matters
- How SLC6A20, calcium fidelity, CYB5B, and embryonic organoids fit the RF Safe model of autism risk
- Americans Are Not Just Having Fewer Children. They Are Losing Biological Fidelity.



