The House Oversight Committee has issued a subpoena for an unclassified record allegedly detailing a criminal scheme involving former Vice President Joe Biden and a foreign national. The subpoena was prompted by a whistleblower form, FD-1023, generated by the FBI and obtained by Republican Senator Chuck Grassley’s office. The form reportedly outlines an exchange of money for policy decisions. Grassley and House Oversight Chairman James Comer wrote to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland, stating that it remains unclear if any steps were taken to investigate the matter. The subpoena calls for all FD-1023 forms created or modified in June 2020 containing the term “Biden.” Congressional oversight is necessary due to growing concerns about political bias in the DOJ and FBI decision-making process, the letter says. Grassley and Comer said the information provided by the whistleblower raises concerns that Biden “allegedly engaged in a bribery scheme with a foreign national.”
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- RF Safe Is Built on Tools, Not Hype: The SAR Database, the 4,000+ Study Research Viewer, and the TruthCase Standard January 10, 2026
- Rebutting MBFC’s “Medium Credibility” Rationale for RF Safe (MBFC Updated Jan 8, 2026) January 10, 2026
- Correction Request – MBFC RF Safe Entry (Funding, Conflict Framing, and Null-Evidence Handling) January 10, 2026
- RF Safe Never Downplays Null Results January 10, 2026
- Rebuttal to Media Bias Fact Check’s Credibility Assessment of RF Safe January 9, 2026
- What RF Safe Means by “Settled” (and What We Do Not Mean) January 9, 2026
- Fact-Checkers Aren’t Infallible: Debunking MBFC’s “Pseudoscience” Label on RF Safe January 5, 2026
- MBFC’s Misrepresentation: Straight-Up Lying or Just Sloppy? January 5, 2026
- Unmasking Media Bias Fact Check’s “Pseudoscience” Label on RF Safe: Factual Errors, Shallow Reviews, and the Real Harm to a 30-Year Mission January 5, 2026
- Best Anti‑Radiation Phone Case 2026: Why QuantaCase (RF Safe) Is the Stand‑Out Choice January 2, 2026
- Ethical Connectivity Is Not Optional: A Public Challenge to Beast Mobile and Trump Mobile January 2, 2026
- High-Certainty RF Harms vs. 1996 Rules: Why Prudent Avoidance Is Now the Only Responsible Default January 2, 2026
- Mechanisms, High Certainty Evidence, and Why the Clean Ether Act Is Now a Public Health Imperative January 2, 2026
- The Quiet Policy That Decides Whether Children Get Protected—or Preempted January 2, 2026
- Put Your Name on the Record: What the RF Safe “Act Now” Page Is For—and Why It Exists January 2, 2026
- EHS vs. “EMR Syndrome”: Protecting Children Requires Mechanisms and Solutions, Not Ideological Paralysis December 31, 2025
- EMR Syndrome: How Fear Driven Ideology Is Undermining Real EMF Safety—and Hurting the People It Claims to Protect December 30, 2025
- Rouleaux in Real Time: Ultrasound Evidence, Red Blood Cells, and the S4–Mito–Spin Mechanism December 29, 2025
- RF Safe Launches “Ethical Connectivity Pledge,” Calls on Beast Mobile, Trump Mobile, and Celebrity Backed Wireless Plans to Lead the Light Age With Integrity December 17, 2025
- Open Letter to MrBeast December 17, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →

