In this article, we delve into the fascinating and controversial theory of Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, who believes that memory is an inherent property of nature. Dr. Sheldrake has spent the last forty years of his career investigating slippery, esoteric phenomena, and we explore his findings in detail. We also examine the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to exhibit true consciousness, a topic that has sparked lively debate in recent years. While Dr. Sheldrake is skeptical of AI’s ability to truly replicate human consciousness, there are engineers who claim that these systems are already capable of exhibiting true intelligence and consciousness. However, understanding the limitations of AI is crucial when discussing this topic. We examine the differences between digital, analog, and quantum computing, and explore why some experts believe that analog and quantum computing systems may hold more promise for achieving true consciousness. Finally, we offer insights from an engineer who has developed technology highly dependent on AI. John Coates explains how setting the temperature of the model simulates probabilistic processes in these digital AI systems to exhibit true intelligence consciousness. By exploring diverse perspectives on this complex topic, we hope to offer readers a more nuanced understanding of the potential and limitations of AI and the nature of consciousness itself.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- Vindicated: How January 2026’s Seismic Shifts Expose the Flaws in Fact Checkers’ Critique of RF Safe January 25, 2026
- The “FDA Proof” MBFC Cited Against RF Safe Was Removed January 25, 2026
- Checking Fact Checkers: MBFC’s Reliance on a Now Removed FDA Page @MBFC_News January 25, 2026
- RFK Jr. and HHS Were Right to Remove Blanket “Cell Phone Radiation Is Safe” Assurances January 19, 2026
- RFK Jr. Was Right to Pull FDA’s Blanket “Cell Phone Radiation Is Safe” Assurances January 19, 2026
- Cell Phone Radiation: What HHS/FDA actually did—and why that matters January 19, 2026
- The Mechanistic Pivot: Why HHS and FDA Must Fund Predictive Biology Now (S4–Mito–Spin) January 17, 2026
- RFK Jr., HHS, and the FDA’s Cell Phone Radiation Reset January 17, 2026
- FDA Removes “Safety Conclusion” Cellphone Radiation Pages as HHS Announces a New Study—Why the “NTP Was Too High Dose” Talking Point Fails January 16, 2026
- HHS study, FDA “before vs after,” and the FCC court remand January 16, 2026
- The Federal Script Just Changed on Cellphone Radiation: FDA Deletes “Old Conclusions” as HHS Launches a New Study January 16, 2026
- A Monumental Shift: FDA’s Cellphone Radiation Page Overhaul – From Unsubstantiated Safety Claims to Embracing the 1968 Mandate January 16, 2026
- When the FTC Put “Radiation Shield” Scams on Notice—and Why RF Safe Says the Warning Started Earlier January 16, 2026
- RF Safe’s QuantaCase (also known as TruthCase) January 16, 2026
- The Anti‑Radiation Phone Case Market Runs on Percentages. RF Safe Refuses to Sell One. January 15, 2026
- Why RF Safe’s TruthCase Refuses the “99% Blocking” Game — and Why That’s the Point January 15, 2026
- The Anti Radiation Case That Refuses to Sell a Number January 15, 2026
- RF Safe’s Market Position and Industry Skepticism January 15, 2026
- Rebutting Media Bias/Fact Check’s “Medium Credibility” Rating for RF Safe: How the S4 Mito Spin Framework Integrates Null Findings as Boundary Conditions January 14, 2026
- Negative Controls That Matter January 14, 2026
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →

