The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for safeguarding the environment from damage caused by communication infrastructure. This mandate includes protecting wildlife and human health, preserving historic sites, and preventing aesthetic blight. However, when companies seek to add new cell phone towers, build on protected land, or launch satellites, the FCC typically does little or nothing to address the potential environmental impacts. The agency’s neglect of environmental protection is particularly concerning as it presides over a nationwide buildout for 5G service, which will require 800,000 new “small cell” transmitters placed near schools, apartments, and homes. Despite this massive effort, the FCC has refused to revise its radiation-exposure limits and has cut back on required environmental reviews while restricting local governments’ control over wireless sites. Additionally, the agency’s approach is hands-off, delegating much of its responsibility to the industries it regulates and allowing companies to decide for themselves whether their projects require environmental study. In the rare instances in which the FCC investigates, even brazen illegality is often met with a minor fine or no action at all. The agency declined to make officials available for interviews for this article or to respond to questions sent in writing.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- EMF-The Dangers and How to Mitigate Risk December 4, 2025
- From Bell’s Photophone to the Light Age: How Wireless Took a Wrong Turn — and How We Correct It November 29, 2025
- The Clean Ether Light Age Roadmap November 29, 2025
- Clean Ether, TruthCase™ & the Light‑First Endgame November 29, 2025
- What people should understand about the science now November 29, 2025
- Black Friday TruthCase and important RF SAFE email update November 28, 2025
- The True Legacy of RF Safe as a Pioneer in EMF Safety Advocacy: Beyond Bias November 28, 2025
- Beyond Bias: The True Legacy of RF Safe as a Pioneer in EMF Safety Advocacy November 27, 2025
- Shadows in the Spectrum: The Ongoing Clash Between Light, Waves, and the Fight for Children’s Health November 27, 2025
- TruthCase™ by RF SAFE QuantaCase November 26, 2025
- Why the S4 Mito Spin Framework Demands Immediate Regulatory Overhaul: A Deep Dive into Non Thermal EMF Mechanisms November 26, 2025
- The Missing Physics: Non Thermal EMF Effects Through the Lens of the S4 Mito Spin Framework November 26, 2025
- Exposing the Overlooked Physics: Non Thermal EMF Effects and the S4 Mito Spin Framework in 2025 November 26, 2025
- Your Phone Is Turning Your Blood Into Pancakes: The 2025 EMF Wake-Up Call That’s About to Explode November 26, 2025
- Unpacking the S4–Mito–Spin Framework: Could This Be the Missing Piece in EMF Health Debates? November 26, 2025
- What Exactly Is S4-Mito-Spin? November 26, 2025
- HHS Is Breaking Federal Law Public Law 90-602 November 26, 2025
- THE INVISIBLE APOCALYPSE: How Non Thermal EMF Is Silently Destroying Humanity November 26, 2025
- THE CLEAN ETHER ACT: End the Silent Genocide of Non-Thermal EMF – Mandate LiFi NOW or Sacrifice Our Children to Corporate Lies November 26, 2025
- The S4–Mitochondria–Spin Framework: A Unified Theory of Non Thermal RF/ELF Biological Effects – Now Backed by Explosive 2025 Evidence That Demands Immediate Action November 26, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →

