The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for safeguarding the environment from damage caused by communication infrastructure. This mandate includes protecting wildlife and human health, preserving historic sites, and preventing aesthetic blight. However, when companies seek to add new cell phone towers, build on protected land, or launch satellites, the FCC typically does little or nothing to address the potential environmental impacts. The agency’s neglect of environmental protection is particularly concerning as it presides over a nationwide buildout for 5G service, which will require 800,000 new “small cell” transmitters placed near schools, apartments, and homes. Despite this massive effort, the FCC has refused to revise its radiation-exposure limits and has cut back on required environmental reviews while restricting local governments’ control over wireless sites. Additionally, the agency’s approach is hands-off, delegating much of its responsibility to the industries it regulates and allowing companies to decide for themselves whether their projects require environmental study. In the rare instances in which the FCC investigates, even brazen illegality is often met with a minor fine or no action at all. The agency declined to make officials available for interviews for this article or to respond to questions sent in writing.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- RF Safe Launches “Ethical Connectivity Pledge,” Calls on Beast Mobile, Trump Mobile, and Celebrity Backed Wireless Plans to Lead the Light Age With Integrity December 17, 2025
- Open Letter to MrBeast December 17, 2025
- The “Good Light → Bad Light” Problem December 17, 2025
- Beast Mobile Ethical Connectivity Is Not Optional December 17, 2025
- How RF Safe Will Serve Humanity in 2026 December 17, 2025
- MrBeast: If You’re Going to Launch “Beast Mobile,” Don’t Put a Microwave Transmitter in Kids’ Pockets Without a LiFi Exit December 17, 2025
- Atomic Neural Network within DNA December 16, 2025
- This piece does not argue that radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields “cause” any single disease. December 15, 2025
- How non‑native electromagnetic fields, biological timing, and policy lock in converge — and why the Light Age is the only coherent exit December 13, 2025
- The 140-Year Low-Fidelity Experiment December 13, 2025
- Cell Towers: the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause is absolutely implicated December 13, 2025
- Best Anti-Radiation Phone Case 2026: Why QuantaCase is the Only Truthful Choice in a Sea of Scams December 11, 2025
- Why Percentage Claims in Anti-Radiation Phone Cases Are Deceptive: The Truth Behind RF Shielding December 11, 2025
- QuantaCase: A Physics-First Tool for Precautionary RF Exposure Reduction in Phone Cases December 10, 2025
- Why QuantaCase™ Tops the List December 10, 2025
- TruthCase™: Revolutionizing EMF Protection – Beyond Shields to Science, Habits, and Systemic Change December 10, 2025
- RF Safe’s Radical Marketing – Zero Ads, All Education in the EMF Safety World December 10, 2025
- Grok’s Pick: The Best Anti-Radiation Phone Case in a Sea of Scams and Half-Measures December 10, 2025
- Unmasking the Hidden Dangers of Your Phone’s Invisible Waves December 10, 2025
- Devolving One Calcium Burst at a Time December 9, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →

