In a recent breakthrough, researchers have successfully engineered a synthetic gene oscillator to slow cellular aging and promote longevity. The team, led by Lei Stanley Qi and Chao Tang at Stanford University, used computational biology to redesign gene circuits and map deteriorative processes in yeast cells. The oscillator became an “executable idea” in 2020 after the team identified the two main deteriorative processes that occur in the nucleus and mitochondria. The researchers believe that this process can eventually be applied to humans through gene therapy. If maintaining oscillations promotes balance in the cell and longevity on a universal scale, periodic pharmacological and nutritional interventions may also be developed. Howard Salis, an associate professor of biological and chemical engineering at Penn State University, notes that human cells contain similar age-committing genetic circuitry, making the same method of rewiring a possibility. The team’s recent study on “Engineering longevity” was published in the journal Science and includes researchers Zhen Zhou, Yuting Liu, Yushen Feng, Stephen Klepin, Lev Tsimring, Lorraine Pillus, and Jeff Hasty.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- Vindicated: How January 2026’s Seismic Shifts Expose the Flaws in Fact Checkers’ Critique of RF Safe January 25, 2026
- The “FDA Proof” MBFC Cited Against RF Safe Was Removed January 25, 2026
- Checking Fact Checkers: MBFC’s Reliance on a Now Removed FDA Page @MBFC_News January 25, 2026
- RFK Jr. and HHS Were Right to Remove Blanket “Cell Phone Radiation Is Safe” Assurances January 19, 2026
- RFK Jr. Was Right to Pull FDA’s Blanket “Cell Phone Radiation Is Safe” Assurances January 19, 2026
- Cell Phone Radiation: What HHS/FDA actually did—and why that matters January 19, 2026
- The Mechanistic Pivot: Why HHS and FDA Must Fund Predictive Biology Now (S4–Mito–Spin) January 17, 2026
- RFK Jr., HHS, and the FDA’s Cell Phone Radiation Reset January 17, 2026
- FDA Removes “Safety Conclusion” Cellphone Radiation Pages as HHS Announces a New Study—Why the “NTP Was Too High Dose” Talking Point Fails January 16, 2026
- HHS study, FDA “before vs after,” and the FCC court remand January 16, 2026
- The Federal Script Just Changed on Cellphone Radiation: FDA Deletes “Old Conclusions” as HHS Launches a New Study January 16, 2026
- A Monumental Shift: FDA’s Cellphone Radiation Page Overhaul – From Unsubstantiated Safety Claims to Embracing the 1968 Mandate January 16, 2026
- When the FTC Put “Radiation Shield” Scams on Notice—and Why RF Safe Says the Warning Started Earlier January 16, 2026
- RF Safe’s QuantaCase (also known as TruthCase) January 16, 2026
- The Anti‑Radiation Phone Case Market Runs on Percentages. RF Safe Refuses to Sell One. January 15, 2026
- Why RF Safe’s TruthCase Refuses the “99% Blocking” Game — and Why That’s the Point January 15, 2026
- The Anti Radiation Case That Refuses to Sell a Number January 15, 2026
- RF Safe’s Market Position and Industry Skepticism January 15, 2026
- Rebutting Media Bias/Fact Check’s “Medium Credibility” Rating for RF Safe: How the S4 Mito Spin Framework Integrates Null Findings as Boundary Conditions January 14, 2026
- Negative Controls That Matter January 14, 2026
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison → -
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →

