Why HHS and Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. must act now under Public Law 90‑602
Executive summary
For three decades, the United States has regulated radio‑frequency (RF) exposure as if heating were the only biologically relevant effect. That “thermal‑only” frame was locked in when the FCC codified SAR‑based limits in the mid‑1990s—the same year Congress passed Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act, which largely preempts local governments from considering the health effects of RF emissions if facilities meet FCC limits. Taken together, those moves displaced health agencies, narrowed scientific inquiry, and fenced the public out of siting decisions.
Meanwhile, basic biology has progressed. Small millivolt changes at the S4 voltage sensor of ion channels alter the timing of potassium, calcium, and proton flux that immune cells decode to set activation thresholds. Patterned, low‑frequency–modulated RF can plausibly perturb that timing without heating tissue—pushing mitochondria toward reactive oxygen species at Complex I and Complex III, and activating innate sensors (cGAS–STING, TLR9, NLRP3). Large rodent studies report malignant heart schwannomas and brain gliomas; cell and tissue studies show oxidative stress and immune modulation at non‑thermal levels; a 2025 5G study shows a mitochondrial gene signature in mouse cortex at sub‑thermal SAR. Tissues richest in voltage‑gated channels and mitochondria—heart and nerve—are exactly where the strongest signals appear.
Public Law 90‑602 (Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act) already directs the Secretary of HHS to “establish and carry out” an electronic‑product radiation control program and to “plan, conduct, coordinate, and support research” and “make results available” to the public. Yet NTP’s RF bioeffects program was halted in 2024 and remains unrestarted. That is a continuing lapse under a statute that says shall.
This article explains how we arrived here, why the Ion Timing Fidelity mechanism makes the thermal‑only frame obsolete, how regulatory capture and procedural preemption (Section 704) kept policy frozen, and what HHS must do now: restart NTP’s RF research, modernize standards around timing parameters, and implement a Clean Ether Act that moves high‑capacity indoor traffic to LiFi while performance standards update.
How the policy failure was built
1) Health authority sidelined; communications regulator in charge
Beginning in the early‑to‑mid 1990s, Washington shifted practical control of RF exposure policy to the FCC, a spectrum and communications regulator—not a health agency. The EPA’s non‑ionizing radiation role diminished. The FCC then codified SAR‑based limits derived from standards bodies focused on thermal thresholds. By design, those limits do not evaluate non‑thermal mechanisms or biological timing variables.
2) Procedural preemption of communities
In the same legislative season, Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act largely preempted state and local governments from regulating the placement of wireless facilities on the basis of health or environmental effects if emissions comply with FCC limits. Whatever one’s constitutional theory—First Amendment (speech and petition), Fifth Amendment (takings, due process), Tenth Amendment (reserved police powers)—the practical effect was unmistakable: local health concerns were ruled out of bounds at the very moment the national standard froze around a thermal frame.
3) Industry influence and sponsorship bias
The 1990s also produced the now‑famous internal “war‑gaming” memo about how to discredit academic work reporting RF‑linked DNA damage—an early window into sponsorship bias that later meta‑research confirmed across various RF endpoints. Add to that a federal scientific culture that for years under‑funded non‑thermal biology; the result was a 30‑year evidence bottleneck.
4) The modern freeze: outdated summaries and moving goalposts
Recent federal syntheses (e.g., child‑health assessments) have at times cut off evidence windows around 2022—omitting convergent findings that strengthened in 2024–2025 (animal cancer certainty; male fertility outcomes; pregnancy cohorts). At the very moment the hazard signal matured, NTP’s RF program was halted. That is the opposite of what Public Law 90‑602 requires.
The science can no longer be ignored
Ion Timing Fidelity: the missing control variable
Voltage‑gated ion channels open when the S4 helix—a short, positively charged segment—moves in the membrane field. The sensing region is ~one nanometer; tens of millivolts across that distance deterministically change opening rates by large factors. In immune cells, this directly resets:
-
Kv1.3 / KCa3.1 → membrane potential, which sets the driving force for calcium;
-
ORAI1 with STIM1 → store‑operated calcium entry, which clocks NFAT and NF‑kappaB;
-
HVCN1 → proton efflux, which must match the respiratory burst.
When ion timing fidelity is degraded by pulsed/modulated fields, calcium waveforms and proton compensation change. Mitochondria take up extra calcium, workload at Complex I and Complex III rises, ROS increase, and innate sensors engage. This is a non‑thermal pathway from field patterning to inflammation and loss of tolerance.
Evidence that lines up across levels
-
Cells/tissues: Immune cells exposed to mobile‑class RF show early cytokine and oxidant increases and transient phagocytosis deficits without cell death—exactly what a timing error predicts. Reviews covering ~100 experiments report oxidative stress at low intensities; mitochondria‑focused reviews localize ROS to Complex I/III and tie RF to calcium‑workload coupling.
-
Animals: The National Toxicology Program reported clear evidence for malignant cardiac schwannomas in male rats; the Ramazzini Institute observed similar tumor types under far‑field, tower‑like exposures. WHO‑commissioned reviews (2025) rate animal cancer evidence high for heart schwannomas and gliomas.
-
Real‑world patterning: A 2025 5G‑NR (3.5 GHz) mouse study at sub‑thermal SAR up‑regulated 10 of 13 mtDNA‑encoded OXPHOS genes in cortex (Complex I/III emphasis)—a mitochondrial signature that fits the workload/ROS arm of the mechanism.
-
Tissue specificity: Heart and nerve are VGIC‑dense and mitochondria‑dense—precisely the organs where macro signals appear (cardiac schwannomas, gliomas).
Conclusion: The thermal‑only rubric is out of date. The timing of ion‑flux control is the biological variable that policy missed—and it’s measurable today.
The legal duty is already on the books
Public Law 90‑602 is not optional. It states that the Secretary of HHS shall:
-
“establish and carry out” an electronic‑product radiation control program;
-
“plan, conduct, coordinate, and support research” to minimize emissions and exposure;
-
“collect and make available” the results to the public.
With NTP’s RF program halted, HHS is out of alignment with this mandate. The remedy is not courtroom rhetoric; it is programmatic action.
The fix: a Clean Ether Act (administrative and legislative)
-
Restart NTP’s RF bioeffects program immediately. Publish a timetable and milestones. Preregister protocols. Use indoor‑mimetic pulsing and report timing variables (duty cycle, burst structure, peak‑to‑average). Measure, in the same preparations: channel activation parameters; calcium timing and NFAT entry; mitochondrial ROS and membrane potential; cytosolic mtDNA with cGAS–STING, TLR9, NLRP3 readouts; rescue with pathway‑specific inhibitors. Open data.
-
Modernize standards around timing, not heat. Update device performance standards to include duty cycle, pulse structure, and peak‑to‑average ratio, alongside proximity and placement.
-
Issue LiFi‑first guidance for schools and childcare within six months. Move high‑capacity indoor traffic to light‑based networking (IEEE 802.11bb); maintain wired backbones; remove transmitters from sleep/infant spaces; publish procurement and configuration specs.
-
Restore community voice. Congress should repeal or reform Section 704 so localities can consider health‑protective siting (e.g., precautionary setbacks ~1,500 feet from homes and schools as recommended by precautionary frameworks like the BioInitiative), while national standards modernize.
-
Correct federal summaries. Issue a technical annex that incorporates post‑2022 evidence (WHO 2025 animal cancer certainty; male‑fertility endpoints; pregnancy cohorts) and addresses non‑monotonic biology and sponsorship bias.
Constitutional note (not legal advice): Critics argue Section 704’s preemption raises First Amendment concerns (curtailing petition and debate on health grounds), possible Fifth Amendment issues (takings/due process where siting harms cannot be contested), and Tenth Amendment conflicts (local police powers). Courts, not advocates, decide constitutional questions—but Congress can and should fix a statute that muzzles health‑protective governance.
What leadership looks like—now
Secretary Kennedy, you have both the statutory authority and the scientific necessity to act. Public Law 90‑602 gives HHS a clear job: run the program, do the research, inform the public. The scientific path is straightforward: measure timing. The engineering remedy is available: reduce indoor RF timing stress and shift to LiFi while standards update. The public expects exactly this kind of stewardship when emerging evidence touches children’s health.
Every day of delay is another day offside the law—and another day that classrooms and bedrooms carry timing patterns biology never evolved to parse. Restart NTP. Publish the plan. Clean the indoor ether. Let communities protect themselves while national standards catch up to science.
Share‑ready statement (verbatim)
Public Law 90‑602 requires HHS to run and fund an electronic‑product radiation control program and to conduct and publish research. Yet NTP’s RF work remains halted while convergent evidence shows mechanistic plausibility for non‑thermal harm: millivolt‑scale shifts at the S4 voltage sensor degrade ion timing, push mitochondria toward reactive oxygen species at Complex I and III, and activate innate sensors that lower immune tolerance—findings that align with animal tumors in heart and brain and human oxidative and immune effects. HHS must restart NTP’s RF program now, modernize standards around timing variables, and issue LiFi‑first guidance for schools. Congress should reform Section 704 to restore health‑protective siting. The thermal‑only frame is obsolete; the law says shall; the clock is running.
