The Unconstitutional Betrayal: How RF Radiation is Fueling a Chronic Disease Crisis While the Government Looks Away

The Fight to Protect Melanie Coates and Every Child From Unregulated Wireless Radiation

In 1996, two laws were put in place that have led to one of the greatest public health cover-ups in American history. First, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which included Section 704, made it illegal for any local or state government to reject a cell tower based on health or environmental concerns—even when clear evidence of harm exists. Second, the FCC set its radiofrequency (RF) safety guidelines that same year, but they were never based on health science—only on engineering assumptions to allow for rapid industry expansion. These two actions, taken together, stripped Americans of their constitutional rights, silenced science, and put millions of lives at risk.

Today, my seven-year-old daughter, Melanie Coates, sits just 465 feet from a high-power cell tower, when the BioInitiative Report and international health experts say that cell towers should be no closer than 1,500 feet from schools. Yet, because of Section 704, I have no legal right to challenge this hazard. I cannot cite health data in an appeal. I cannot demand protective action. The law—crafted by telecom lobbyists and rubber-stamped by the government—has stolen my ability as a father to protect my child from this radiation exposure.

The fact that Public Law 90-602, passed in 1968, legally requires the government to research and regulate radiation exposure—including non-ionizing RF radiation—only makes this betrayal worse. The government is violating its own law, abandoning its duty to protect Americans, and pretending that real safety guidelines exist when they do not. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) was defunded after finding “clear evidence” that RF radiation causes cancer, DNA damage, and oxidative stress. This is not a failure of oversight—it is deliberate suppression.

The Truth: FCC RF Limits Are a Fraud

The FCC’s 1996 RF exposure guidelines were written at a time when:

• There were no smartphones or Wi-Fi networks blanketing homes, schools, and public spaces.
• 5G and millimeter wave frequencies were not even imagined.
• The only concern considered was thermal heating of human tissue, ignoring decades of scientific research showing biological harm at non-thermal levels.
• Industry engineers, not medical experts, dictated the limits—designed to support industry growth, not public health.

These exposure “limits” were never meant to protect children or pregnant women. They did not account for chronic exposure, long-term effects, or biological interactions with human cells. Today, these outdated and fraudulent guidelines are still being used to justify the placement of cell towers near schools, homes, and hospitals, despite overwhelming evidence that RF radiation causes harm at levels far below FCC limits.

The Evidence of Harm is Overwhelming

The National Toxicology Program (NTP) Study, funded by the U.S. government, found clear evidence of:

• DNA damage in rats and mice from RF radiation—undeniable proof that this radiation is not biologically inert.
• Cancerous tumors in the heart and brain of exposed rats, proving a direct link between RF exposure and tumor formation.
• Non-linear dose responses, meaning even low levels of exposure can be more dangerous than previously assumed.

The Ramazzini Institute Study, conducted in Italy, confirmed the NTP’s findings at exposure levels 60 times lower than the FCC’s limits—levels millions of Americans experience daily from cell towers, routers, and mobile devices.

The BioInitiative Report, compiled by 29 independent scientists and health experts from 10 countries, analyzed over 1,800 peer-reviewed studies and concluded that:

• RF radiation causes oxidative stress, a key mechanism linked to cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and reproductive harm.
• Children are uniquely vulnerable, as their developing brains and bodies absorb more radiation than adults.
• Current exposure levels are vastly unsafe and must be dramatically lowered.

Yet, instead of acting to protect public health, the government has done the opposite:

• The NTP’s research was defunded and terminated after its damning findings.
• The EPA’s funding for RF radiation research was cut in 1996, the same year the FCC set its fraudulent exposure limits.
• Congress refuses to act, despite growing evidence of harm, because the wireless industry pours millions into lobbying and campaign contributions.

The Chronic Disease Crisis and RF Radiation

The rise in chronic diseases in the United States correlates with the mass deployment of wireless technology:

• Brain cancer rates are rising, particularly glioblastomas—the same tumors found in RF-exposed rats.
• ADHD, autism, and other neurodevelopmental disorders have skyrocketed, aligning with research showing RF radiation affects brain function.
• Infertility rates are climbing, as studies show RF exposure reduces sperm count, motility, and viability.
• Autoimmune diseases, metabolic disorders, and sleep disturbances are becoming epidemics—many linked to oxidative stress and biological disruption caused by RF exposure.

Wireless radiation is not the sole cause of these conditions, but it is a major contributing factor that is being completely ignored by health agencies under industry pressure.

The Path Forward: What Must Be Done

1. REPEAL SECTION 704 OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT
   • Restore the rights of local governments and citizens to challenge cell tower placements based on health and environmental concerns.
   • End the unconstitutional corporate protection of the wireless industry at the expense of public health.
2. ENFORCE PUBLIC LAW 90-602
   • The government must follow its own law and regulate RF radiation exposure as required under the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968.
   • Restore funding for the National Toxicology Program and independent research into RF biological effects.
3. UPDATE FCC SAFETY GUIDELINES TO REFLECT MODERN SCIENCE
   • Set exposure limits that account for non-thermal effects, chronic exposure, and children’s vulnerability.
   • Base regulations on medical and environmental science, not industry expansion goals.
4. REMOVE CELL TOWERS FROM SCHOOLS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS
   • Follow the BioInitiative Report’s recommendation: No towers within 1,500 feet of schools, homes, and hospitals.
   • Replace outdated RF-dependent infrastructure with fiber optics, Li-Fi, and other low-radiation technologies.
5. PROTECT CHILDREN LIKE MELANIE COATES FROM RADIATION EXPOSURE
   • As a father, I am fighting for my daughter’s right to a safe environment, free from the constant bombardment of RF radiation.
   • Every parent must demand action to protect their children from this silent, invisible threat.

A Call to Action: #Repeal704 #EnforcePublicLaw90602

This is not a partisan issue. This is about the right of every American to protect their health and their children. The telecom industry and the federal government have worked together to suppress the truth, but we are not powerless. We must demand action.

📢 Share this article. Contact your representatives. Demand that Section 704 be repealed. Insist that real health-based RF guidelines be implemented. Support research and education on safer alternatives.

The fight for our children’s health is just beginning. We will not be silenced.