Health Council of the Netherlands and evaluation of the fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication and cancer risks

Abstract

Overview

With the global rollout of 5G wireless communication, concerns have been raised about the potential health risks associated with radiofrequency radiation. An appeal for a moratorium on 5G until adequate scientific evaluation was largely ignored. The Health Council of the Netherlands, relying on reports from the WHO and the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, sides with continuing 5G implementation under certain guidelines, raising questions about impartiality.

Findings

• The evaluation adopted the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines, criticized for not adequately protecting against radiofrequency radiation hazards.
• A specific frequency band (26 GHz) should be avoided until its health risks are assessed.
• Mechanistic studies indicate radiofrequency radiation could increase oxidative stress and DNA damage, supporting epidemiological findings linking 5G exposure to increased cancer risk, such as gliomas and acoustic neuromas.

Conclusion

Despite existing evidence suggesting serious health risks, the report supports the continued use of lower frequency bands for 5G. The conclusion downplays risks and fails to halt 5G rollout, demonstrating a need for a moratorium and reevaluation of health safety standards in light of newer technologies and findings. Wired solutions are proposed as safer alternatives.