• RF Safe Blog
    • RF – Source: Wireless Radiation
    • UVA – Source: Sun
    • UVB – Source: Sun
    • UVC – Source: Sterilization
    • Far-UVC – Source: Safe Sterilization
    • UVGI-Fi – Source: Far-UV Germicidal Wireless Communications
    • Glossary
  • SAR Levels
    • Specific Absorption Rate
    • What is RF Radiation?
  • RF Safe Headsets
    • Stereo Air Tube Headset
    • Mono Air Tube Headset
    • RF Safe Ferrite Beads
  • My Account
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    • View Shopping Cart
    • Secure Checkout
    • Warranty Coverage
    • Order Tracking
    • Resend Password
RF (Radio Frequency) Safe
  • March 4th, 2021
RF (Radio Frequency) Safe
  • RF Safe Blog
    • RF – Source: Wireless Radiation
    • UVA – Source: Sun
    • UVB – Source: Sun
    • UVC – Source: Sterilization
    • Far-UVC – Source: Safe Sterilization
    • UVGI-Fi – Source: Far-UV Germicidal Wireless Communications
    • Glossary
  • SAR Levels
    • Specific Absorption Rate
    • What is RF Radiation?
  • RF Safe Headsets
    • Stereo Air Tube Headset
    • Mono Air Tube Headset
    • RF Safe Ferrite Beads
  • My Account
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    • View Shopping Cart
    • Secure Checkout
    • Warranty Coverage
    • Order Tracking
    • Resend Password
Home
Cell Phone Radiation

Galaxy Note 5 vs Note 4 Radiation Test – Best Smartphone Case Radiation Shield

Cell Phone Radiation

Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest

Galaxy Note 5 vs Galaxy Note 4 RF Radiation Test. Review the best way to reduce microwave radiation exposure from your brand new Galaxy Note 5 and compare the results with the Galaxy Note 4.

Galaxy Note 5 SAR Levels vs Galaxy Note 4 SAR Levels

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 5 SAR LEVELS

NOTE 5 Flip Cover Radiation Shields, with air-tube headset package

FCC measured SAR:
SM-920V (for Verizon)
FCC ID value: A3LSMN920V

Head SAR: 0.21 W/kg
Body SAR:0.70 W/kg
Product
Specific Use SAR:1.10 W/kg
Simultaneous
Transmission SAR:1.48 W/kg

FCC measured SAR:
SM-N920R4 (for U.S. Cellular)
FCC ID value: A3LSMN920R4

Head SAR:0.21 W/kg
Body SAR:0.70 W/kg
Product
Specific Use SAR:1.08 W/kg
Simultaneous
Transmission:1.46 W/kg

FCC measured SAR:
SM-N920P (for AT&T)
FCC ID value: A3LSMN920A

Head SAR:0.22 W/kg
Body SAR:0.76 W/kg
Product
Specific Use SAR:0.98 W/kg
Simultaneous
Transmission SAR:1.27 W/kg

FCC measured SAR:
SM-N920T (for T-Mobile)
FCC ID value: A3LSMN920T

Head SAR:0.28 W/kg
Body SAR:1.07 W/kg
Product
Specific Use SAR:1.09 W/kg
Simultaneous
Transmission SAR:1.38 W/kg

SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 4 SAR LEVELS

NOTE 4 Flip Cover Radiation Shields, with air-tube headset package

FCC measured SAR:
SM-N910V (for Verizon)

Head: 0.20 W/kg
Body:0.53 W/kg
Product
Specific Use:1.03 W/kg
Simultaneous
Transmission:1.40 W/kg

FCC measured SAR:
SM-N910R4 (for U.S. Cellular)

Head:0.35 W/kg
Body:1.00 W/kg
Product
Specific Use:1.07 W/kg
Simultaneous
Transmission:1.53 W/kg

FCC measured SAR:
SM-N910P (for Sprint)

Head:0.39 W/kg
Body:0.69 W/kg
Product
Specific Use:1.07 W/kg
Simultaneous
Transmission:1.24 W/kg

FCC measured SAR:
SM-N910T (for T-Mobile)

Head:0.33 W/kg
Body:0.56 W/kg
Product
Specific Use:0.80 W/kg
Simultaneous
Transmission:1.17 W/kg

  • Tags
  • Galaxy Note 4
  • Galaxy Note 5
  • Galaxy Note 5 SAR vs Galaxy Note 4 SAR
  • SAR Levels
Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest
Next article Why Would Ants Keep Safe Circular Distance From iPhone? Yet You Don't?
Previous article Galaxy S6 Radiation: E-Field Display Radiation vs RF Radiation

Related Posts

FCC Hit with Lawsuit  by Nobel Prize Winner Alleging Failure to Protect Public Health Cell Phone Radiation

FCC Hit with Lawsuit by Nobel Prize Winner Alleging Failure to Protect Public Health

Holiday 2018 Warning: Don't Gift Wrap Brain Cancer! Smartphones, Kids and Cancer Cell Phone Radiation

Holiday 2018 Warning: Don't Gift Wrap Brain Cancer! Smartphones, Kids and Cancer

RF Safe's SAR Checker Cell Phone Radiation

RF Safe's SAR Checker

Research & Phone Specs Search
Cart
REMEMBERING CORONAVIRUS VICTIMS
Timeline
Feb 3rd 3:19 PM
Cell Phone Radiation

5G and the UV connection of skin-deep EMR exposure (5G research is warranted on skin-deep EMR study)

Feb 3rd 3:11 PM
Cell Phone Radiation

5G issue goes skin deep as does EMR energy that is less penetrating than 5G exposure!

Jan 9th 6:18 AM
Cell Phone Radiation

RF Safe Code of Ethics for Manufacturers

Sep 7th 10:35 PM
Cell Phone Radiation

Labor Day- (We are nothing without the people that made us a great company) -Help Wanted –

Jul 13th 2:16 AM
Conventional UVC

QuantaDose™ UVC Indicator UV Dosimeter UVC Light Test Card

May 28th 5:39 AM
Cell Phone Radiation

Apple Claims Federal Regulations Bar iPhone Radiation Safety Suit

Apr 24th 3:03 PM
Imminent Danger Alerts

Coronavirus Tracker USA

Apr 3rd 5:28 AM
Imminent Danger Alerts

FDA Said It Will Stop Blocking Imports Of KN95 Mask, But What Spooked China?

Mar 31st 4:25 AM
Imminent Danger Alerts

Unwarranted FDA KN95 Mask Restrictions Could Lead To Killing Doctors, Front-line Workers and Old!

Mar 13th 5:35 AM
Far-UVC

WAR On Coronavirus: Human-safe Far-UVC Sterilization Project

  • HOME
  • My Account
  • Shop
  • Cart
  • Contact Us
  • Back to top
RF Safe™ and Peel-n-Shield™ are Trademarks of RF Safe Corporation
© RF Safe™ 1998-2020. Smartphone Radiation Safety Helpline: 1 (844) 473-7233