If you’re concerned about electromagnetic fields (EMF), radiofrequency (RF) radiation from cell phones, Wi-Fi, 5G, or everyday wireless tech, rfsafe.org is a brand-new public resource worth bookmarking. Launched just days ago (around February 19, 2026) by the long-established RF Safe organization (the same team behind rfsafe.com and protective accessories like QuantaCase), this .org domain is a dedicated, open-access EMF research library and practical mitigation hub. It’s not a commercial storefront or traditional blog—it’s a functional, data-driven portal built for transparency, with over 6,500 peer-reviewed studies on biological effects.
I visited the site, clicked through every visible section, tested the filters and tools, and explored the menu/navigation. Here’s a complete, section-by-section breakdown of what rfsafe.org has to offer, plus my overall review.
1. Navigation & Site Structure (Minimalist & Focused)
- Header/Hamburger Menu (☰): Simple top bar with the RFSafe.org logo/title and a hamburger icon. No sprawling multi-level dropdowns like on many health sites—this keeps things fast and database-centric. Visible links route internally.
- Core Navigation Links (extracted from pages):
- Home / Papers list (the default landing page)
- Reviewed Papers (/mel/papers_class.php)
- Papers Stats (/mel/papers_stats.php)
- EMF Exposure & Mitigation Intake (/intake/)
- Filters Toolbar (prominent on every papers page): Real-time dropdowns for “All effects” (Harm, Mixed, No effect, Unclear, Benefit, Unknown), “All evidence” (High to Insufficient), and “All years” (1970–2026 + Unknown). A quick “Open stats →” button jumps to the dashboard.
- Footer & Other Elements: Very light—no heavy footer, social icons, or newsletter signup on the main pages I visited. The site is deliberately clean and JS-heavy (infinite scroll + interactive charts require JavaScript; a noscript fallback links to paginated browsing).
- No shop, blog posts, or “About Us” section here—that lives on the sister site rfsafe.com.
The navigation philosophy is clear: get straight to the science and the action plan.
2. The Core Research Database (Homepage + Reviewed Papers)
This is the heart of rfsafe.org—an open, searchable library of ~6,573 peer-reviewed studies on EMF/RF biological effects.
- Homepage (rfsafe.org/): Loads straight into a filtered list of recent “Harm”-classified papers with one-sentence AI-assisted summaries. Examples I saw (all 2025–2026 publications):
- 6 GHz RF on kidney oxidative stress and morphology
- Sub-terahertz effects on DNA base pairing
- Smartphone addiction’s impact on college students’ sleep and performance
- 28 GHz 5G-band radiation amplifying chemotherapy cardiotoxicity
- RF-EMF weakening plant drought-stress responses
- Reviewed Papers page (/mel/papers_class.php): Same database with full filter controls and infinite scroll (or ?page=2 manual navigation). Papers tagged “Harm manual” or “Harm pubmed” for easy sourcing. You can drill down by evidence quality or year.
- Key Features:
- Neutral classification system (AI + manual review noted as imperfect).
- Direct links to original PubMed or journal sources.
- Embeddable on any website via RSS (as announced in the launch news).
It’s not curated opinion pieces—it’s raw, filterable science.
3. Papers Stats Dashboard (/mel/papers_stats.php)
One of the most impressive sections. This interactive page visualizes the entire library:
- Totals (as of my visit):
- Harm: 1,395 (21.2%)
- Mixed: 1,873 (28.5%)
- No effect: 622 (9.5%)
- Unclear: 1,657 (25.2%)
- Benefit: 729 (11.1%)
- Unknown/no extraction: 303 (4.6%)
- Evidence Strength Breakdown: Low evidence dominates (57.8%), followed by Insufficient (24.2%).
- Yearly Trends Chart: Stacked bar graph from 1971–2026 showing publication volume and effect classifications. Huge growth in the 2010s–2020s, with recent fluctuations.
- Interactive Elements: Click bars to filter, toggle categories, full-screen view, YoY percentage changes in a clean table.
- Automated Insight Note: Highlights that harm/mixed findings outnumber “no effect,” suggesting a precautionary approach (“as low as reasonably achievable”), while reminding users to verify originals and that this isn’t medical advice.
Perfect for researchers, journalists, or anyone wanting the big-picture data at a glance.
4. EMF Exposure & Mitigation Intake (/intake/)
The practical “what now?” tool. This multi-step wizard helps you assess your personal RF/EMF exposures and outputs a prioritized mitigation action plan.
- Steps in the Wizard:
- Contact & Consent
- Optional: Route to a practitioner/clinic
- Home Wi-Fi / Router
- Mobile & 5G
- Nearby Cell Infrastructure
- Smart Home / IoT
- Sleep Environment
- Work / School
- Vehicles
- Wearables / Medical
- Tools & Mitigation options
- Priorities
- Review & Submit
- How it Works: Multi-select checklists (Ctrl/Cmd to pick multiple), live scoring/banding system. At the end, you get tailored recommendations ranked by impact.
- Purpose: Turns abstract research into personal action—e.g., “shield your router first” or “reconfigure sleep area.”
JavaScript required for the full experience, but it’s intuitive and designed for everyday users.
Overall Website Review: Strengths, Weaknesses & Verdict
Strengths:
- Massive Free Resource: 6,500+ studies in one filterable place—no paywalls, no sign-ups for basic browsing.
- Transparency & Tools: Stats dashboard + personal intake form make it more actionable than typical research archives.
- Timely & Relevant: Covers cutting-edge topics like 6 GHz, 28 GHz 5G, smartphone addiction, and even plant/animal effects.
- Public-Health Focus: Aligns with RF Safe’s 25+ year mission (founded 1998 after founder John Coates’ personal loss) without aggressive selling.
Weaknesses:
- Extremely minimalist design—feels more like a beta database than a polished consumer site.
- Heavy JS dependence (some users on older browsers or no-script mode get limited functionality).
- No traditional blog, search bar (beyond filters), or deep “About” page on .org (use rfsafe.com for that).
- Classification system relies partly on AI—site itself notes potential errors.
Who It’s For: Researchers, EMF-aware parents, health practitioners, policy advocates, or anyone wanting evidence-based info on wireless safety. If you just want to buy a phone case, stick to rfsafe.com.
Final Score: 8.5/10 for functionality and depth; 6/10 for polish and discoverability. As a brand-new launch, it’s already one of the most comprehensive free EMF research portals online. Expect it to grow quickly—watch for new filters, user accounts, or export tools.
Bookmark rfsafe.org today and run yourself through the intake form. Knowledge is the first step toward safer tech use.
Have you visited yet? Drop your thoughts below—I’d love to hear what you discover in the database!
