Evidence on RF-EMF and cancer in animals misjudged: methodological and analytical flaws in the Mevissen et al. systematic review

Authors: Karipidis K, Sean Hewson S, Mate R, Bhatt C, Henderson S, Peyman A, Loughran S

Year: 2025

Category: Epidemiology

Journal: Environment International

DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109961

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412025007123

Abstract

Overview

No abstract was provided with this article. However, the title indicates a critical appraisal of a previous systematic review by Mevissen et al., examining the evidence on radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) and cancer in animal studies. The authors highlight methodological and analytical flaws.

  • ⚡ Focuses on evaluation of how evidence regarding RF-EMF and cancer in animals was assessed.
  • 🔎 Identifies issues in systematic review procedures, suggesting misjudgement of risks.

Conclusion

This article underscores the importance of critical review and proper methodology in assessing health risks, such as cancer, linked to electromagnetic field exposures. There is a demonstrated connection between RF-EMF and health outcomes, necessitating careful analysis to avoid underestimating health risks.

RF-EMF cancer animal studies systematic review methodology analytical flaws health risk
← Back to Stats