SAR Links

Search Archives

Recent Posts

• Nothing Burger: “400 Times Below the Limit” Does Not Resolve the 49ers EMF Question
• Radio Wave Packet – What You Need to Know about Wireless Technology
• Why Non Thermal RF May Never Map to One Disease, One Cause
• nnEMFs: It Was Never Just Cancer
• High Certainty Evidence: Mobile Phone Radiation, Cancer, Fertility — and Why Current Limits Are No Longer Defensible
• RFK Jr. Knows These FDA Statements Are Indefensible Lies — He Must Order Them Deleted Today
• Proposed Regulatory Guidance Framework: Why Certain Electromagnetic Phenomena Must Be Regulated When Biologically Relevant
• New Risk Assessment Shows Current RF Exposure Limits Are Far Too High to Be Called Child Protective
• Time-domain nonlinearity / early-worse than attenuation or recovery pattern
• Solid Reasons Why “Non Ionizing = Safe” and Every Other Dismissal Is Now Obsolete
• Bret Weinstein & Heather Heying just spent an entire DarkHorse episode (317) pushing the most dangerous, cherry-picked disinformation on the NTP study yet — and they know it.
• ICNIRP’s Death Grip: The Tiny Cartel of Insiders in Full Panic Mode, Desperately Defending Their Outdated, Industry Aligned Thermal Only Dogma While Our Children’s Brains, Fertility, and Futures Are Being Destroyed
• Current RF Exposure Limits Are Not Supported by the Animal Cancer and Reproductive Evidence
• New Modeling Published Today in Environmental Health Shows Current RF-EMF Limits Are 200× Too High for Cancer Risk
• Urgent: Peer-Reviewed Science Just Proved Cell Phone Radiation Limits Are 200× Too High — Children’s Developing Brains Are in Danger
• SafeSleeve Hits a New Low: “Sleep With Your Phone in Bed — Our Case Makes It Safe”
• Why RF Safe’s EMF Education Stands on Its Own Merit: A First-Principles Review (No Bias, No Alarmism — Just 30 Years of Practical Solutions)
• Why Criticisms of RF Safe Are Unjustified in 2026
• The RF Safe Guide to Cell Phone Radiation Levels, Cell Phone Radiation Dangers, and Smarter Phone Protection
• The Thermal Only Story Is Over
• Thermal Only Wireless Guidelines Are No Longer Defensible
• Thermal Only RF Safety Standards Are Not Health Standards
• Why the Precautionary Principle Is Scientifically Justified
• NTP Cell Phone Radiation Study (TR-595): What It Found — and What the Data Actually Mean
• Children Absorb More RF Radiation — And Now the Highest Level Reviews Confirm Cancer & Fertility Risks in Animals
• The TruthCase™ — My Open-Source First Principles from 1998 (Still True in 2026)
• Reviewing the S4–Mito–Spin Framework on Tissue Selectivity Predictions
• The Thermal Myth Is Dead: Regulators Still Claim “Only Heating Matters” While the Science Proves Everyday RF-EMF Causes Biological Interaction
• Patient Zero: The 140-Year Experiment – How Heinrich Hertz’s 1887 Spark Ignited Wireless Technology and a Century of Ignored Biological Harm
• The 2 Centimeter Problem: Wireless Radiation, Blood Flow, Sleep Hormones, and Why “Non Thermal” Doesn’t Mean “Non Biological” (2026)