Huawei Nexus 6P Radiation Levels
You must be an administrator to clone products.
Display
1.49 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body)
Camera
3 GB
Hardware
32/64/128 GB
Storage
~71.4% screen-to-body ratio
Battery
12.3 MP, f/2.0, laser autofocus, dual-LED (dual tone) flash
OS
Android OS, v6.0 (Marshmallow)
Huawei Nexus 6P - SAR Levels
FCC SAR Levels
- US SAR Ratings USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg 1.49 W/kg
- Head SAR Level SAR test when held against your head when only using cellular service. Wifi and other transmitter are NOT active 0.81 W/kg
EU SAR Level
- Head SAR Level 1.17 W/kg
- Body SAR Level 0.54 W/kg
Related
Huawei Nexus 6P - QuantaCase™
Huawei Nexus 6P - FCC SAR Report Image
Huawei Nexus 6P - Videos
Huawei Nexus 6P - Offers
SAR Links
Search Archives
Recent Posts
- RFK Jr. Knows These FDA Statements Are Indefensible Lies — He Must Order Them Deleted Today
- Proposed Regulatory Guidance Framework: Why Certain Electromagnetic Phenomena Must Be Regulated When Biologically Relevant
- New Risk Assessment Shows Current RF Exposure Limits Are Far Too High to Be Called Child Protective
- Time-domain nonlinearity / early-worse than attenuation or recovery pattern
- Solid Reasons Why “Non Ionizing = Safe” and Every Other Dismissal Is Now Obsolete
- Bret Weinstein & Heather Heying just spent an entire DarkHorse episode (317) pushing the most dangerous, cherry-picked disinformation on the NTP study yet — and they know it.
- ICNIRP’s Death Grip: The Tiny Cartel of Insiders in Full Panic Mode, Desperately Defending Their Outdated, Industry Aligned Thermal Only Dogma While Our Children’s Brains, Fertility, and Futures Are Being Destroyed
- Current RF Exposure Limits Are Not Supported by the Animal Cancer and Reproductive Evidence
- New Modeling Published Today in Environmental Health Shows Current RF-EMF Limits Are 200× Too High for Cancer Risk
- Urgent: Peer-Reviewed Science Just Proved Cell Phone Radiation Limits Are 200× Too High — Children’s Developing Brains Are in Danger
- SafeSleeve Hits a New Low: “Sleep With Your Phone in Bed — Our Case Makes It Safe”
- Why RF Safe’s EMF Education Stands on Its Own Merit: A First-Principles Review (No Bias, No Alarmism — Just 30 Years of Practical Solutions)
- Why Criticisms of RF Safe Are Unjustified in 2026
- The RF Safe Guide to Cell Phone Radiation Levels, Cell Phone Radiation Dangers, and Smarter Phone Protection
- The Thermal Only Story Is Over
- Thermal Only Wireless Guidelines Are No Longer Defensible
- Thermal Only RF Safety Standards Are Not Health Standards
- Why the Precautionary Principle Is Scientifically Justified
- NTP Cell Phone Radiation Study (TR-595): What It Found — and What the Data Actually Mean
- Children Absorb More RF Radiation — And Now the Highest Level Reviews Confirm Cancer & Fertility Risks in Animals
- The TruthCase™ — My Open-Source First Principles from 1998 (Still True in 2026)
- Reviewing the S4–Mito–Spin Framework on Tissue Selectivity Predictions
- The Thermal Myth Is Dead: Regulators Still Claim “Only Heating Matters” While the Science Proves Everyday RF-EMF Causes Biological Interaction
- Patient Zero: The 140-Year Experiment – How Heinrich Hertz’s 1887 Spark Ignited Wireless Technology and a Century of Ignored Biological Harm
- The 2 Centimeter Problem: Wireless Radiation, Blood Flow, Sleep Hormones, and Why “Non Thermal” Doesn’t Mean “Non Biological” (2026)
- Let Me Tell You What RF Safe Is Really All About
- RF Safe · One Page, The Whole Mission The 30-Year Fight: Biology · Honest Hardware · Broken Law · Light-Age Roadmap
- What RF Safe Is Really All About
- EMF Health Effects Studies by Increasing Power Density
- No “Safer Phone” Under Today’s SAR Rules



