Let me welcome you the only way I know how: straight.
If you’re reading this, you are the resistance. I can say that confidently because I didn’t spend money on an ad to get you here. There was no Google campaign. No paid promotion. We rarely email. We don’t live on “boosted posts.”
So if you found this, you weren’t herded here by an algorithm—I earned your attention with the content, and you brought yourself. That matters.
Because this movement is not a vibe. It’s not a slogan. It’s a set of levers—real levers—inside a system that has been captured by a microwave-era business model and protected by outdated law, outdated standards, and institutional inertia. And those levers can be pulled.
The Levers We Must Pull (and We can pull them)
Here’s the list. Not a “wish list.” A to-do list.
1) Repeal Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act
Section 704 is the stranglehold. It is the legal mechanism used to shut down communities when they try to raise health and environmental concerns about wireless infrastructure placement—as long as the facilities comply with FCC RF exposure rules.
That is backwards. It makes local democracy subordinate to a thermal-only compliance framework.
2) Reinvigorate and enforce Public Law 90-602
Public Law 90-602 is not a “nice idea.” It is a congressional mandate. It establishes an electronic product radiation control program which shall include standards development and research.
Not “might.” Not “could.” Shall.
And if agencies ignore it, that is not “policy.” It is noncompliance with law.
3) Force the FCC to comply with the court remand
The D.C. Circuit already called the FCC out for keeping the 1996 limits without a reasoned explanation—especially regarding harms unrelated to cancer, long-term exposure, and other evidence in the record.
That remand is not a press release. It is the judiciary telling the FCC: your reasoning is not adequate.
And the lag is unconscionable.
4) Strip the FCC of RF “health safety” authority
The FCC is not a health agency. It is not a biomedical standards body. It is an auction house and spectrum regulator. When public health is on the line—especially children’s vulnerability—this cannot be controlled by institutional competency that is structurally misaligned with biology and medicine.
Return meaningful health authority to agencies built for health risk evaluation, not spectrum commercialization.
5) Mandate the endgame: the Light Age
There is light at the end of this tunnel—literally.
The endgame is not “better PR.” The endgame is to end the microwave cartel’s stranglehold on indoor communications and move into a Light Age where indoor data is carried by light: safer, more secure, and biologically more compatible than pulsed microwave fields inside homes and classrooms.
Why We Don’t Need Human Causation Theater to Act
People love to trap this conversation in one phrase: “Prove it causes cancer in humans.”
That’s not science. That’s a stalling tactic.
The standard for modern safety policy is not “wait for human casualties and perfect epidemiology.” The standard is: when controlled evidence shows biologically meaningful harm mechanisms and outcomes in experimental models, you update the paradigm.
The Non-Thermal Question Has Moved Past “Speculation”
Here’s what the microwave-age defenders want you to believe:
“If it’s not heating you, it can’t affect you.”
But the research record does not comply with that talking point.
WHO-commissioned animal cancer review
A WHO-commissioned systematic review on RF-EMF exposure and cancer in experimental animals was published in Environment International (2025).
That review exists inside a broader WHO effort commissioning multiple RF-EMF systematic reviews across key outcomes (including cancer and reproductive endpoints).
You can argue about interpretation all day, but you can’t argue the trajectory: the “thermal-only” narrative is being forced to explain biological outcomes it was never designed to address.
Courts already recognized the regulatory gap
The D.C. Circuit remanded the FCC’s decision precisely because the agency failed to provide a reasoned explanation for whether its guidelines protect against harmful effects, including those unrelated to cancer.
That is the court saying what the public already feels: the current system is not behaving like a serious safety regime.
“Non-Thermal Effects” Are So Real Medicine Uses Them
This is where the microwave-age story collapses completely.
There are FDA-reviewed medical technologies that use radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in non-thermal, signal-specific ways for therapeutic intent. One example: TheraBionic P1, a handheld RF EMF generator that emits specific amplitude-modulated frequencies and is FDA-listed as a recently approved device for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma contexts.
Read that again:
We have a regulatory structure that says “only heating matters,” while medical science is developing and clearing devices based on the idea that signal structure can matter biologically—without relying on thermal harm.
That contradiction is not sustainable.
What RF Safe Is Actually Doing Here
RF Safe does not need to claim direct human disease causation to demand reform. That is not the framework’s job.
Our job is to keep this grounded in mechanistic clarity and policy reality:
-
The “thermal-only” regulatory paradigm is obsolete.
-
The law already contains mandates that are being neglected.
-
The courts have already flagged the FCC’s reasoning as inadequate.
-
The endgame is safer technology, not just safer warnings.
The Light Age: What Winning Looks Like
Winning isn’t “better compliance paperwork.”
Winning is a structural transition:
-
Fiber where practical
-
Light-based indoor communications where possible
-
Meaningful limits that reflect biology (not just heat)
-
Safety research treated as mandatory infrastructure—not optional PR
Light is safer indoors. Light is more secure. Light doesn’t need the microwave cartel’s permanent permission slip.
What You Can Do Right Now (real actions, not performative ones)
-
Share this with one person who still believes “it’s just heating.”
-
Demand repeal of Section 704—make it a political cost to ignore.
-
Demand enforcement of Public Law 90-602—“shall” means shall.
-
Demand FCC compliance with the remand—stop letting agencies ignore the courts.
-
Push the Light Age—Li-Fi and other photonic pathways indoors must become the default target, not a fringe idea.
Closing: This Is Not Alarmism—This Is Accountability
When safety guidelines are inadequate to protect biology, RF exposure becomes a public health issue until policy catches up with the science and technology follows the new rules.
That’s not “alarmist.”
That’s what happens when you externalize the real cost of a technology onto the bodies of children while telling everyone it’s fine because the thermometer didn’t move.
If you’re reading this, you’re already part of the resistance.
Now let’s pull the levers.
