Put Your Name on the Record: What the RF Safe “Act Now” Page Is For—and Why It Exists * RF SAFE® Radio Frequency Safe

There are moments when a movement either matures into measurable wins—or fractures into endless commentary while conditions on the ground stay the same.

RF Safe built the Act Now hub for one reason: to turn legitimate EMF safety concerns into enforceable outcomes—for families, for schools, for clinicians, and for local leaders who are tired of being told, “Nothing can be done.”

Start here (the hub):
https://www.rfsafe.com/class/action/

This is not a “learn more” page. It is an action architecture—five levers that, pulled in the right order, restore accountability, restore lawful oversight, and reduce real‑world exposure where it matters most: where children live, learn, and develop.

What the page is (in plain language)

The Act Now hub gathers five actions that move the needle:

Fix Section 704 (restore local authority to consider health evidence in antenna siting)
Finish the FCC court remand (force the FCC to do what the court ordered)
Enforce Public Law 90‑602 (restart the federal electronic-product radiation program at HHS)
Correct the MAHA record (restore missing RF science and child‑first risk framing)
Deploy the Light‑Age solution (shift indoor data payloads off microwaves and onto light via Li‑Fi)

Each “Take Action” button is designed to do something very specific: get your name, your words, and your demands into the record—using copy‑ready scripts and a coherent plan.

Why RF Safe built this: the problem is not awareness—it’s enforcement

For decades, the public has been forced into a rigged workflow:

Communities are told they can “participate,” but the most relevant evidence—health evidence—gets excluded at the decision point.
Federal agencies claim “safety,” but their record and reasoning have not kept pace with modern exposure patterns, modern devices, and modern biology.
Research mandates exist in law, yet programs get deprioritized, defunded, delayed, or buried in bureaucracy.

RF Safe rejects performative outrage. We build leverage.

This hub is leverage.

The five levers—and what each one is designed to accomplish

Action 1: Repeal or reform Section 704 (restore local health authority)

What it is:
Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act functionally gags local governments: it says state/local authorities may not regulate wireless facility siting “on the basis of the environmental effects of radiofrequency emissions” if the facility complies with FCC RF regulations. Legal Information Institute

That is the choke point.

It means schools and communities can be forced into siting outcomes even when they have credible health concerns—because the law bars the question from being controlling in the approval process.

RF Safe’s position is direct: you don’t have meaningful local governance if the public-health basis for a decision is legally disallowed.

Take action page:
https://rfsafe.com/704/

Action 2: Make the FCC complete the court‑ordered remand

What it is:
In Environmental Health Trust v. FCC (D.C. Circuit, August 13, 2021), the court remanded the FCC’s decision to retain its RF exposure guidelines, finding the agency failed to provide a reasoned explanation addressing evidence of harms unrelated to cancer. Justia Law

That matters because the FCC’s current framework still traces back to 1996-era assumptions—while deployment density and exposure patterns have radically changed.

This action is about finishing what the court started:

force a transparent docket,
force reasoned responses,
force modern science into the record,
force child‑specific analysis into standards.

Take action page:
https://rfsafe.com/fcc/

Action 3: Enforce Public Law 90‑602 (HHS must run the federal radiation control program)

What it is:
Public Law 90‑602 (Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968) established an electronic product radiation control program. The codified statute is explicit: “The Secretary shall establish and carry out” the program and, as part of it, conduct/support research and related activities. U.S. Code

This is not a suggestion. It is a statutory duty.

RF Safe’s position is direct: consumer RF emissions and modern wireless devices are not outside the scope of electronic-product radiation oversight—particularly when the law’s purpose is public health protection and a continuous programmatic response. U.S. Code

Take action page:
https://rfsafe.com/hhs/

Action 4: Correct MAHA (because the record shapes policy)

What it is:
The MAHA “Make Our Children Healthy Again: Assessment” exists, and the White House PDF includes the Executive Order text establishing the Commission—explicitly listing “electromagnetic radiation” among contributing causes to be studied. The White House

HHS also publicly described the MAHA Commission’s report and timeline in its May 22, 2025 press release. HHS

Here is the core point RF Safe is making with this action:

If children’s health is the stated mission, then RF cannot be treated as a footnote.
A credible federal assessment must reflect the strongest available evidence and must translate risk into child‑first recommendations—especially in schools and pediatric environments.

Take action page:
https://www.rfsafe.com/maha/

Action 5: Build the Light Age (Li‑Fi‑first indoors)

What it is:
RF Safe’s solution posture is not “ban everything.” It is engineer the environment so that:

high‑throughput indoor payloads move to light,
RF becomes what it should be: mobility and backhaul, not 24/7 indoor saturation.

The practical basis for this is simple physics and simple containment:

RF is designed to propagate widely.
Optical wireless is room‑bounded and can be engineered for privacy and spatial reuse.

IEEE 802.11bb (light communications) was published as a standard in 2023, formalizing an interoperable framework for light-based networking. The Register+1

Take action page:
https://rfsafe.com/bell/

The “Internet of Bodies” panic—and why Li‑Fi actually defeats that fear narrative

A large share of online fear content about the “Internet of Bodies” is a category error: it confuses governance (who collects data, who owns it, consent) with transport physics (how the data moves).

RF Safe’s position is blunt:

If someone is genuinely worried about unconsented body‑level interfacing, Li‑Fi makes that far harder by design.

Why?

Because meaningful optical body interfacing requires all of the following:

a device physically attached to the body (patch/sensor),
a receiver/transceiver that is line‑of‑sight to the light source,
deliberate placement and persistent alignment,
and therefore obvious, visible consent.

Li‑Fi does not “silently couple” through walls while someone sleeps. It does not create an ambient room‑filling field that a body is forced to inhabit. The entire geometry is different.

So if someone claims to fear body surveillance but attacks Li‑Fi, they are not doing privacy advocacy. They are performing fear as identity—and blocking the most consent-aligned indoor wireless architecture available.

How to use the hub (the way it was designed)

Go to:
https://www.rfsafe.com/class/action/

Then do this:

Pick one card that matches your role today (parent, clinician, school official, city official, policy staff, procurement).
Click “Take Action” and use the copy‑ready script.
Put your name on it. Put it into the record.
Share the hub, not just the outrage.

RF Safe is building a chain reaction:

local resolutions → congressional pressure → agency oversight → research restart → standards modernization → safer infrastructure procurement.

That is how systems change.

What success looks like (and what it requires from the public)

Success is not “winning an argument online.”

Success is:

Local leaders can legally consider health evidence again in siting decisions (Section 704 reform). Legal Information Institute
The FCC is forced into a modern, court‑compliant record and rationale (remand completion). Justia Law
HHS runs a continuous research and public-information program as required by law (PL 90‑602 enforcement). U.S. Code
Federal child-health communications stop burying RF and start treating it with honest scientific weight (MAHA correction). The White House+1
Schools and public buildings begin shifting indoor data payloads onto light (Li‑Fi‑first procurement). The Register+1

And none of that happens without public participation that is documented, repeatable, and cumulative.

Closing: this is the moment where signatures matter

Every major public-health course correction has a common feature: ordinary people put their names into the record until institutions could no longer ignore them.

If you want to protect children, don’t just repost fear.

Sign. Send. Call. Show up.
Then bring someone with you.

Start here:
https://www.rfsafe.com/class/action/