Clean Ether, TruthCase™ & the Light‑First Endgame

From RF hazard → broken law → safer habits → Li‑Fi future

RF SAFE • Since the 1990s

Wireless changed everything. It also came with a cost we’ve been trained not to see.

For 30 years, regulators dismissed non‑thermal radiofrequency (RF) and extremely‑low‑frequency (ELF) effects as “inconsistent” or “unproven.” But when you put the best mechanistic work, the big animal cancer studies, and the legal history on the same table, the picture is no longer ambiguous:

• Non‑thermal RF is a credible long‑term biological stressor.

• The regulatory framework we live under is frozen in 1996.

• Congress has already mandated a radiation‑control program under HHS.

• The only stable endgame is to move the indoor burden off microwaves and onto light.

TruthCase™ (QuantaCase® by RF Safe) sits in the middle of that story. It’s not a talisman. It’s a teaching tool designed to:

• reduce near‑body RF from today’s phones in real use, and

• train the habits and architecture we’ll need in a light‑first future.

This page walks you through the full arc:

Hazard → legal failure → personal practice → Li‑Fi / light‑first endgame.

---

1. Hazard: why non‑thermal RF is no longer “mysterious”

Three pillars of science now converge:

1.1 Mechanism: S4–Mito–Spin

At the cellular level, there are only a handful of structures that care about weak RF/ELF fields:

• Voltage‑gated ion channels (VGICs) with S4 voltage sensors (S4)

• Mitochondria and NADPH oxidases (Mito/NOX – ROS engines)

• Spin‑sensitive redox cofactors in heme and flavins (Spin)

Put together, that gives you the S4–Mito–Spin architecture:

• Polarised, pulsed RF/ELF fields disturb the timing of S4 segments in ion channels, adding noise to the way cells handle calcium and other ions.

• Mitochondria and NOX amplify those timing errors into bursts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) – the same chemistry that underlies aging, cancer promotion, and chronic inflammation.

• In cells without S4 or mitochondria (e.g. red blood cells), spin‑dependent radical‑pair chemistry in heme and flavins offers a second weak‑field entry point, consistent with fast shifts in red‑blood‑cell zeta potential and rouleaux formation.

This explains why damage and dysfunction keep clustering in the same places:

• Heart conduction fibres and Schwann cells

• Brain glia and cranial nerves

• Testis (Leydig + germ cells)

• Immune cells decoding Ca²⁺ timing as danger or tolerance

• Blood (RBC/platelet rheology and endothelium)

All of those are high‑S4, high‑Mito/NOX, or high‑Spin tissues.

1.2 Animal cancer: NTP + Ramazzini with non‑linear dose–response

Two large, independent rodent bioassays say the same thing:

• The U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) exposed rats to 900 MHz GSM/CDMA at whole‑body SARs of ~1.5, 3, and 6 W/kg. Male rats showed:

  • Clear evidence of malignant heart schwannomas, and

  • Some evidence of brain gliomas.

• The Ramazzini Institute exposed rats from prenatal life to death to 1.8 GHz base‑station‑like fields at 0.001–0.1 W/kg (far below typical phone SARs) and still saw:

  • Increased malignant heart schwannomas in males

  • Elevated glial tumours in the brain

Three facts rarely mentioned together:

1. Non‑linear dose–response.
   In NTP, some endpoints – especially male‑rat heart schwannomas – were higher at 1.5 W/kg than at 6 W/kg. The response is non‑monotonic: there is a window where tumour risk is worst, not a simple “more watts = more cancer” line.

2. Low‑dose replication.
   Ramazzini shows you can hit the same two rare tumour types at ~0.1 W/kg and below in a totally different geometry (far‑field, base‑station‑like).

3. Human relevance.
   Morphology and genetic profiling tie these rat tumours back to human gliomas and Schwann‑cell tumours – they’re not strange rat‑only lesions.

A WHO‑commissioned animal cancer review has now rated the evidence for RF‑induced heart schwannomas and brain gliomas in rodents as high certainty.

1.3 Humans, fertility, immune & blood

On the human side:

• Case–control work like INTERPHONE shows elevated glioma risk in the highest decile of use (≈1.3–1.4×), even though “heavy use” in that era was only ~30 minutes/day and business users with the very highest minutes were folded into the reference group, diluting the signal.

• WHO‑linked reviews find reduced pregnancy rates and impaired sperm quality when males are exposed before conception, consistent with oxidative‑stress and DNA‑damage data at non‑thermal levels.

• Immune studies show cytokine shifts, thymus/spleen changes, and gene‑expression changes under RF/ELF, fitting the S4–Mito–Spin picture of timing disruption and chronic ROS.

• Real‑time ultrasound work has imaged in vivo rouleaux formation (RBC stacking) after just minutes of smartphone exposure near the leg, consistent with rapid, spin‑mediated redox changes in blood.

Is every study positive? No. But at this point the honest summary is:

Non‑thermal RF is a credible long‑term risk factor, especially for tissues loaded with ion channels, mitochondria/NOX, or heme/flavin redox systems.

The science is no longer the bottleneck. The law is.

---

2. Legal failure: a 1968 mandate ignored and a 1996 gag law

Two federal landmarks shape the mess we’re in:

2.1 Public Law 90‑602 – the mandate that’s being ignored

In 1968, Congress passed the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act, now codified at 21 U.S.C. §§ 360hh–360ss. It requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to:

• “establish and carry out an electronic product radiation control program” to protect public health and safety from electronic product radiation, including non‑ionizing RF.

• That program must include:

  • Development and administration of performance standards for electronic products;

  • Research, investigations, and training on the effects and control of such radiation;

  • Ongoing study and evaluation of exposures from electronic products and intense fields.

Phones, routers, Wi‑Fi access points, smart meters, and IoT hubs are all “electronic products” emitting non‑ionizing radiation. They are squarely within PL 90‑602’s scope.

That law does not need updating. It needs to be enforced.

Today:

• The NTP RF program that once did foundational work has been wound down.

• No comparable, fully scoped PL 90‑602 RF program is running under HHS/FDA.

That is a statutory failure, not a gap in authority.

2.2 Section 704 – the gag on local health protection

In 1996, Congress passed the Telecommunications Act. Section 704, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7), says local governments:

“may not regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radiofrequency emissions”
if those facilities comply with FCC limits.

In practice, that means:

• Communities cannot deny towers or dense small‑cell deployments because of health concerns, as long as the operator proves compliance with FCC guidelines.

• Those same FCC limits are still based on 1996 thermal‑only thinking.

In Environmental Health Trust v. FCC (2021), the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals held that the FCC’s decision to keep its 1996 RF limits was “arbitrary and capricious” for failing to address non‑cancer harms, children, long‑term and whole‑body exposures, and evolving technologies, and remanded the issue back to the FCC.

So we now have:

• A statutory mandate (PL 90‑602) that says HHS shall research and set performance standards for electronic product radiation.

• A court ruling that says the FCC did not justify keeping 1996 limits.

• A gag rule (Section 704) that prevents local governments from acting even when they see a problem.

Until PL 90‑602 is enforced and Section 704 is repealed or fundamentally rewritten, parents and communities are effectively locked out.

---

3. Personal practice: what TruthCase™ is really for

While the law catches up, people still need to live and work every day.

RF Safe’s position is simple:

You don’t need to wait for perfect regulations to start aligning your habits and hardware with the physics and biology we already understand.

That’s where TruthCase™ / QuantaCase® comes in. It exists to do three things at once:

1. Reduce near‑body RF in real use.

2. Train correct orientation and duty‑cycle habits.

3. Expose the design flaws in most “anti‑radiation” cases.

3.1 First‑principles design: what it does and doesn’t do

TruthCase is built around simple RF truths:

• Shield the person, not the phone.
  The front flap contains a continuous conductive layer. When you close it between your head and the phone, you reduce the field into your head and neck. Independent KPIX‑5 testing found flip‑style cases reduced RF by ~85–90% out of the face of the phone when used properly with the flap closed.

• Don’t provoke power ramp‑ups.
  Magnets, steel plates, and metal loops near antenna zones detune the antenna and degrade the link. The phone’s power‑control responds by transmitting harder, which can raise your exposure instead of lowering it. TruthCase deliberately avoids:

  • metal strap loops,

  • detachable magnet/plate sandwiches,

  • thick, multi‑slot wallet stacks on the RF side.

• Keep continuity at the ear.
  Large, unshielded ear‑side holes break the shield exactly where you need it most. TruthCase uses a conductive mesh at the ear opening, preserving a shield path while letting audio through.

• Stay ultra‑thin where radios live.
  Excess bulk between the phone and the network changes the near‑field and can again push the phone to higher power. TruthCase stays slim and antenna‑aware.

• Be verifiable.
  The ear‑side mesh is ohmmeter‑checkable, so users can confirm there is a continuous conductive path. No mystique – just conductive deflection you can measure.

3.2 Habits TruthCase is designed to teach

Hardware only works if habits are aligned. TruthCase pushes you toward:

• During calls:

  • Answer/place the call, then close the flap toward your head.

  • Use speakerphone or a wired/air‑tube headset for longer calls.

• Pocket carry:

  • Put the phone with the shielded front flap toward your body (back pocket often best).

  • Don’t carry an active phone pressed against soft tissues for hours.

• Texting / scrolling:

  • Fold the flap behind the phone so the shield sits between your hand and the device.

  • Keep the rest of your body at distance.

• At night:

  • Distance and airplane mode first.

  • Treat the case as a backup for short unavoidable proximity, not a license to sleep on your phone.

3.3 TruthScore™: how to spot a fake “anti‑radiation” case

We encourage people to score any case using TruthScore™:

Add 1 point for each red flag:

1. Metal strap loops or other metal near edges

2. Detachable design with magnets/steel plates

3. Large, unshielded ear‑side speaker hole

4. Thick, multi‑slot wallet construction on the phone side

5. “Up to 99% protection” claims based only on fabric swatches, not whole‑device, orientation‑specific testing

0/5 = acceptable. Anything else: avoid.

TruthCase is engineered to score 0/5.

But even a perfect case does not fix the environment. It buys you time and trains the behaviours that match where we need to go next.

---

4. Endgame: Light‑first indoors, RF pushed back to infrastructure

Once you admit that modern microwave‑based wireless does not come free, especially for children, there is only one coherent destination:

Offload the indoor RF burden onto the light spectrum.
Indoors, use light and wires. Outdoors and in transit, use RF as infrastructure and backhaul.

4.1 Why Li‑Fi is the natural carrier for clean ether

Li‑Fi (light‑based wireless) is no longer a lab curiosity:

• In 2023, IEEE ratified 802.11bb, a Li‑Fi standard that defines line‑of‑sight, light‑based WLAN as a member of the 802.11 family, using near‑infrared (≈800–1000 nm) to deliver from tens of Mb/s up to 9.6 Gb/s, interoperable with Wi‑Fi stacks.

Li‑Fi has the properties we need for children’s spaces:

• Physical containment.
  Light does not punch through walls and roofs the way GHz microwaves do. Once you stop putting RF transmitters inside the envelope, ordinary building materials become a passive RF shield.

• High capacity and low latency.
  The optical band is orders of magnitude wider than RF allocations, supporting multi‑Gb/s streams with excellent latency and low interference.

• Built‑in privacy.
  Because the beam footprint is physically bounded by walls, Li‑Fi cells are naturally tight – ideal for classrooms, bedrooms, clinics, and offices.

The logical endgame looks like this:

• Indoors:

  • Li‑Fi (802.11bb and successors) + Ethernet/PLC carry most traffic.

  • Access points are in the ceiling luminaires, not in your lap.

  • Indoor‑only IoT (sensors, appliances, AR/VR gear) uses light or wires by default.

• Outdoors / backbone:

  • RF is used where it excels – for mobile coverage and backhaul.

  • Macro towers, rooftop nodes, high‑altitude platforms, and satellites handle coverage.

  • Distance, beamforming, and building geometry keep indoor child exposures low.

Once that transition happens, roofs and walls reclaim their role as a buffer between children and RF infrastructure instead of being bypassed by indoor RF routers, mesh repeaters, and “smart” IoT radios in every room.

4.2 What “mandate Li‑Fi” really means

To make that transition real, you don’t just recommend Li‑Fi; you require compatibility step by step:

1. Indoor infrastructure:

   • Building codes and procurement rules for schools, hospitals, offices, and new multi‑family housing specify Li‑Fi capability as a required feature of network upgrades.

   • RF access points become supplemental, not primary, indoors.

2. IoT and appliances:

   • Standards for indoor‑only devices require a light‑based or wired primary link, with microwave radios either disabled by default indoors or limited to very low‑duty emergency use.

3. Performance standards under PL 90‑602:

   • HHS/FDA, using the authority they already have, write performance standards for electronic product radiation that favour low‑penetration carriers (light) and constrain near‑body RF emissions for consumer devices.

Section 704 is the obstacle here: as long as local governments are forbidden from regulating RF siting “on the basis of environmental effects,” they cannot insist on light‑first indoor designs or use zoning to prioritise Li‑Fi and roof‑line/backbone RF instead of small cells at playground height.

That’s why:

Public Law 90‑602 does not need to be rewritten.
Section 704 of the Telecom Act does.

PL 90‑602 tells HHS “you shall.”
Section 704 tells localities “you may not.”

Those two in tension are the core policy problem.

---

5. RF Safe’s Li‑Fi with BioDefense Mode: a concrete endgame prototype

RF Safe is not just talking about Li‑Fi in the abstract. It already holds one of the most advanced Li‑Fi system concepts aimed squarely at this endgame:

• U.S. Patent US11700058B2, System for wireless communication using germicidal light frequencies (John Coates et al.), describes a Li‑Fi architecture that uses Far‑UVC light to carry data and continuously inactivate airborne and surface pathogens – a BioDefense Mode for indoor spaces.

Core ideas:

• Far‑UVC (≈207–230 nm).
  Wavelengths that are strongly absorbed in the outermost layers of skin and eyes, so they can inactivate viruses and bacteria while having very shallow penetration in human tissue when operated within emerging safety guidelines.

• Dual‑use nodes.
  Ceiling‑mounted units act as:

  • Li‑Fi access points, modulating UV light for high‑speed data; and

  • UVGI emitters, metering dose to clean the air and surfaces in occupied rooms.

• Sensor‑driven control.
  Environmental sensors (air quality, occupancy, reflected dose) dynamically adjust output to balance data, disinfection, and safety.

This is what a mature Clean Ether environment looks like in practice:

• Indoors, your “Wi‑Fi” is now light‑based, not microwave‑based.

• Child RF exposure from indoor transmitters is effectively zero, because there are no indoor RF transmitters running at high duty cycle.

• At the same time, the air is being continuously disinfected by carefully controlled Far‑UVC – an answer to pathogens that RF could never provide.

RF Safe’s Li‑Fi with BioDefense Mode is not the only path to that future, but it proves the endgame is technically achievable:

You can have connectivity + cleaner air, without saturating kids in microwaves.

---

6. The whole story in one line

For readers, policymakers, and parents, here is the through‑line:

Non‑thermal RF is now a credible long‑term health risk, especially for heart, brain, reproductive, immune, and blood systems. Congress already told HHS to control electronic product radiation; the FCC’s 1996 limits have been called arbitrary by a federal court; and Section 704 gags communities from acting. The sane path is clear: enforce Public Law 90‑602, repeal or repair Section 704, use tools like TruthCase™ to cut exposure and train good habits today, and build a Light‑First future where indoor networks and IoT run on Li‑Fi – ideally with BioDefense‑mode systems that use light to move data and clean the air – while microwaves are pushed back to the infrastructure layer and out of children’s daily breathing zone.

That is the Clean Ether roadmap:

• Hazard acknowledged.

• Law obeyed.

• Rights restored.

• Habits retrained.

• And the RF burden on our children offloaded from microwaves to light.