Search

 

RFK Jr.’s MAHA Report: A Betrayal of Public Law 90-602 and a Whitewash of Wireless Risks

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told parents on camera:

“If you got a kid, don’t ever let him put his cell phone near his head … don’t let him carry it in one of his front pockets … don’t let them carry them anywhere near their ovaries.”

He reminded viewers that he and allied groups had just “won a big suit against the FCC” for lying to the public about cell phone radiation. That 2021 case (Environmental Health Trust v. FCC) forced regulators back to the drawing board after the D.C. Circuit declared FCC’s 1996 guidelines “arbitrary and capricious.”

And yet—less than a year into Kennedy’s tenure as Secretary of Health and Human Services—the very office legally bound by Public Law 90-602 (1968) to maintain continuous oversight of radiation risks has produced the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Report, a document that astonishingly downplays or omits the strongest wireless health science ever published.


What Public Law 90-602 Requires

The statute is clear:

  • “The Secretary shall establish and carry out an electronic product radiation control program …” (21 U.S.C. § 360ii)

  • “The Secretary shall by regulation prescribe performance standards for electronic products …” (21 U.S.C. § 360kk)

Kennedy now sits in the very chair responsible for enforcing this law. And yet the MAHA report represents its wholesale violation.


What MAHA Said vs. What the Science Shows

The MAHA Commission devoted one paragraph to electromagnetic field (EMF) hazards, rating evidence of harm to children as “low to inadequate.” This conclusion is indefensible in light of the science MAHA chose to exclude.

Key Science MAHA Missed

Milestone Finding Relevance
NTP 2-year bioassay (2018) “Clear evidence” of heart schwannomas & brain gliomas at ≤ 3 W/kg Cited by MAHA but downgraded as “needs more research”
Ramazzini lifetime study (2018) Same tumors at tower-level 0.1 W/kg Not cited
WHO cancer review (Mevissen 2025) High certainty for glioma & schwannoma at ≤ 0.3 W/kg SAR Not cited
WHO fertility review (Cordelli 2024; corrigendum 2025) 68% ↑ failed pregnancy odds; sperm DNA damage ↑ 1.9 SD Not cited

The NTP’s Dose-Inversion Signal

NTP GSM brain lesions

The National Toxicology Program’s GSM data showed the highest tumor incidence at 1.5 W/kgbelow the FCC’s “safety” ceiling.

  • Malignant gliomas: 3 tumors at 1.5 W/kg, compared to 2 at 6 W/kg.

  • Glial hyperplasia: 2 at 1.5 W/kg, compared to 1 at 6 W/kg.

This non-linear, non-monotonic dose-response was flagged by NTP statisticians as biologically important. Yet MAHA ignored it completely, perpetuating the FCC’s obsolete “only heating matters” narrative.


WHO’s 2025 Wake-Up Call

In April 2025, the World Health Organization published systematic reviews that should have shattered any pretense of safety:

  • Cancer: Rated the evidence linking RF radiation to gliomas and schwannomas as “High Certainty.”

  • Fertility: Upgraded from moderate to high certainty, showing a 68% increased risk of failed pregnancies and severe sperm DNA damage.

As one independent expert panel put it:

“The long-standing assumption … that RF radiation can only cause harm through tissue heating is wrong.” (ICBE-EMF, 2025)

MAHA ignored these findings entirely.


Corporate Capture: MAHA’s Selective Outrage

The MAHA report devotes pages to showing how pesticide studies are biased by industry funding (harm found in 50% of independent studies vs. 18% of industry-funded). But when it comes to wireless—a sector with three decades of documented industry manipulation—MAHA is silent.

It never mentions the 2021 FCC court defeat, never highlights ICNIRP’s conflicts of interest, and never admits that telecom has perfected the same playbook Big Tobacco once used: delay, deny, and distort.


From Warning Parents to Burying Science

The contradiction is staggering.

  • In 2024, Kennedy told parents to keep phones away from their children’s heads, pockets, and ovaries.

  • In 2021, his organization won a federal court case proving FCC guidelines were indefensible.

  • In 2025, as HHS Secretary, he signs off on a report that downgrades NTP findings, ignores Ramazzini, omits WHO’s latest evidence, and buries the corporate capture that defines telecom’s history.

This isn’t just hypocrisy. It’s unlawful neglect under Public Law 90-602.


The Cost of Silence

By failing to enforce the law, MAHA leaves Americans exposed to:

  • Rising rates of brain tumors, infertility, and developmental harm.

  • A wireless rollout (5G, 6G, satellite-to-phone) completely untethered from safety science.

  • A repeat of tobacco’s century-long tragedy—where children are “protected” only symbolically while the poison floods society unchecked.


Conclusion: Demand Compliance with Public Law 90-602

Public Law 90-602 is not optional. It is a binding mandate. The Secretary of HHS is legally commanded to maintain a radiation safety program grounded in the latest science.

RFK Jr. knows the risks. He said so himself. He defeated the FCC in court. But as HHS Secretary, he now stands in violation of the very law designed to protect America from the wireless experiment unfolding around us.

It’s time for citizens to demand:

  • Immediate resumption and expansion of the NTP’s wireless research.

  • Inclusion of WHO’s 2024–2025 reviews in federal assessments.

  • Rejection of the obsolete thermal paradigm.

  • Full enforcement of Public Law 90-602.

Anything less is not just negligence. It’s betrayal.

We Ship Worldwide

Tracking Provided On Dispatch

Easy 30 days returns

30 days money back guarantee

Replacement Warranty

Best replacement warranty in the business

100% Secure Checkout

AMX / MasterCard / Visa