Lg W41 Pro Radiation Levels
You must be an administrator to clone products.
Display
6.55 inches, 118.3 cm2 (~91.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Camera
Quad Camera: 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8m, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12m
5 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)Hardware
Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
Storage
128GB 6GB RAM
eMMC 5.1Battery
Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable
OS
Android 10
Lg W41 Pro - SAR Levels
Lg W41 Pro - QuantaCase™
Lg W41 Pro - FCC SAR Report Image
Lg W41 Pro - Videos
Lg W41 Pro - Offers
SAR Links
Search Archives
Recent Posts
- Vindicated: How January 2026’s Seismic Shifts Expose the Flaws in Fact Checkers’ Critique of RF Safe
- The “FDA Proof” MBFC Cited Against RF Safe Was Removed
- Checking Fact Checkers: MBFC’s Reliance on a Now Removed FDA Page @MBFC_News
- RFK Jr. and HHS Were Right to Remove Blanket “Cell Phone Radiation Is Safe” Assurances
- RFK Jr. Was Right to Pull FDA’s Blanket “Cell Phone Radiation Is Safe” Assurances
- Cell Phone Radiation: What HHS/FDA actually did—and why that matters
- The Mechanistic Pivot: Why HHS and FDA Must Fund Predictive Biology Now (S4–Mito–Spin)
- RFK Jr., HHS, and the FDA’s Cell Phone Radiation Reset
- FDA Removes “Safety Conclusion” Cellphone Radiation Pages as HHS Announces a New Study—Why the “NTP Was Too High Dose” Talking Point Fails
- HHS study, FDA “before vs after,” and the FCC court remand
- The Federal Script Just Changed on Cellphone Radiation: FDA Deletes “Old Conclusions” as HHS Launches a New Study
- A Monumental Shift: FDA’s Cellphone Radiation Page Overhaul – From Unsubstantiated Safety Claims to Embracing the 1968 Mandate
- When the FTC Put “Radiation Shield” Scams on Notice—and Why RF Safe Says the Warning Started Earlier
- RF Safe’s QuantaCase (also known as TruthCase)
- The Anti‑Radiation Phone Case Market Runs on Percentages. RF Safe Refuses to Sell One.
- Why RF Safe’s TruthCase Refuses the “99% Blocking” Game — and Why That’s the Point
- The Anti Radiation Case That Refuses to Sell a Number
- RF Safe’s Market Position and Industry Skepticism
- Rebutting Media Bias/Fact Check’s “Medium Credibility” Rating for RF Safe: How the S4 Mito Spin Framework Integrates Null Findings as Boundary Conditions
- Negative Controls That Matter
- If You’re Reading This, You Are the Resistance
- Unmasking the Myths: Why the Interphone and Danish Cohort Studies Are Among the Most Misleading in RF-EMF Research
- Why the S4 Mito Spin Framework Stays Out of Human Causation Debates – And Why That’s a Strength for RF/EMF Safety Advocacy
- Why RF Safe’s S4 Mito Spin Framework Stays Out of Human Causation Debates – And Why That’s a Strength for RF/EMF Safety Advocacy
- RF Safe Is Built on Tools, Not Hype: The SAR Database, the 4,000+ Study Research Viewer, and the TruthCase Standard
- Rebutting MBFC’s “Medium Credibility” Rationale for RF Safe (MBFC Updated Jan 8, 2026)
- Correction Request – MBFC RF Safe Entry (Funding, Conflict Framing, and Null-Evidence Handling)
- RF Safe Never Downplays Null Results
- Rebuttal to Media Bias Fact Check’s Credibility Assessment of RF Safe
- What RF Safe Means by “Settled” (and What We Do Not Mean)



