RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?

Abstract

Overview

The study investigates the correlation between the concerns about radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) reported in surveys and the actual concerns affecting individuals in everyday life. It aims to test the common assumption in risk perception studies that questionnaire responses accurately mirror daily concerns.

Findings

A comprehensive online survey involving 2454 participants across six European countries focused on examining RF EMF risks associated with various sources, such as base stations, WiFi routers, and cell phones. Researchers employed a multidimensional approach to measure risk perception, which included:

• Traditional measures of perceived risk magnitude
• Thematic relevance (frequency of thoughts about a risk)
• Discursive relevance (frequency of conversations about a risk)

The study uncovers that high concern levels noted on surveys do not necessarily imply significant thematic relevance in daily life. Distinctions are drawn between enduringly concerned individuals—who regard RF EMF exposure as a continuous concern—and those whose concerns do not translate into everyday consideration or discourse.

Conclusion

Data indicates that those with high thematic relevance view RF EMF exposure as a moral and affective issue and consider themselves highly exposed. Such individuals show sensitivity to measures aimed at reducing exposure, which could enhance the acceptance of RF EMF technologies like base stations in communities. This finding supports the necessity of exposure reduction strategies in increasing public acceptance and alleviating health concerns related to RF EMFs.