Abstract

Overview of the Study

This research paper examines the inadequacies in conventional EMF exposure studies, specifically their failure to accurately simulate the long-term occupational EMF exposure scenarios encountered by workers compared to general public and laboratory settings.

Key Findings

• Long-term occupational exposure is often characterized by intermittent high peak power followed by no exposure, unlike the steady low-level exposure seen in the general population.
• The EU EMF-Directive 2013/35/EU calls for occupational health surveillance which could significantly aid epidemiologists in understanding EMF's health implications.
• Observations note particular concern regarding oxidative stress mechanisms after exposure to various EMF types, highlighting the need for continual health monitoring in occupational settings.

Conclusions and Implications

Current knowledge primarily stems from studies focused on general public exposure scenarios rather than tailored occupational settings. There is a highlighted need for distinct research methodologies that address both general and occupational exposure differences to ensure comprehensive non-ionizing radiation protection and health monitoring.

Further research needs adequate funding and international collaboration, suggesting a framework similar to Horizon Europe projects to explore broadly the impacts of EMF in occupational settings.