Abstract

Overview

This comprehensive review and meta-analysis evaluates the genetic damage in mammal cells exposed to non-ionizing radiofrequency fields (RF). The study encapsulates data from 225 published studies and 2,160 tests to analyze the impact on genetic integrity in animal and human cells.

Methodology

• Blind data collection/analysis to prevent bias
• Detailed dosimetry for potential replication
• Use of positive controls to affirm outcomes
• Employment of sham-exposed controls for comparative analysis

Findings

The investigation reveals that when all four quality control measures are applied, the standardized mean difference (d values) between exposed and control cells is reduced, pointing to a minor effect, if any. The use of increased quality control measures correlates with more reports of no significant genetic damage, while fewer studies report increased damage under these stringent conditions.

Conclusion

This analysis indicates a potential underreporting of the risk by highlighting a bias towards findings of increased genetic damage even in studies with small sample sizes. It underscores the importance of including comprehensive quality control measures to provide reliable data that could be crucial for assessing potential health risks linked to RF energy exposure.