Improving the Quality of Radiofrequency Bioeffects Research: The Need for a Carrot and a Stick

Abstract

Overview

This commentary addresses the urgent research needs concerning the radiofrequency (RF) energy, focusing specifically on frequencies above 6 GHz. These frequencies encompass the "high band" utilized in 5G New Radio (NR) communications systems, positioned just below the mm-wave band (30-300 GHz).

Findings

• Approximately 100 RF bioeffects studies relevant to this frequency range have been published as of late 2020, many of which have reported statistically significant effects of exposure, even at levels considered safe by international limits.
• An examination of 31 genetic damage studies reveals multiple statistically significant effects, suggesting potential carcinogenic risks.
• However, the research exhibits notable shortcomings such as small study size, failure in meeting multiple "Risk of Bias" criteria, naive statistical approaches, and lack of clear hypotheses and analytical methods.

Conclusion

In response to these findings, the commentary advocates for a dual approach to enhance the reliability of RF bioeffects research. This approach proposes improved funding ("carrot") and stricter manuscript reviews ("stick") to ensure higher quality studies that can more effectively inform health agency reviews and address public concerns about the health impacts of RF exposure.