Problems in evaluating the health impacts of radio frequency radiation

Abstract

Overview

This paper evaluates the causal evidence linking radio frequency radiation (RFR) with various health issues. Utilizing an expanded Bradford Hill framework combining experimental and epidemiological data, the research assesses the overall impacts of RFR, especially from mobile communications.

Findings

• Safety Standards and Precautionary Principle: Current standards emphasize thermal effects but overlook robust evidence showing non-thermal biological impacts, emphasising a disconnect with the Precautionary Principle.
• Human and Biological Impact: The study reviews in vivo, in vitro, and clinical studies that point towards RFR's carcinogenic effects and other health risks like endocrinological and neurological disorders.
• Regulatory Gaps: The research argues that regulatory focus heavily favors industrial convenience over public health, exposing the population to avoidable health risks.

Conclusion

The paper concludes with strong evidence supporting the hypothesis that RFR contributes to carcinogenic, endocrinological, and neurological conditions, challenging the sufficiency of current regulatory frameworks concerning public health.