Abstract

Overview

This paper evaluates the official narrative in New Zealand regarding public health and radio frequency emissions from cellphone technology, WiFi, and electricity smart meters. It critically analyzes the outdated regulatory framework and argues against the assumption that non-ionising radiation's only biological effect is tissue heating.

Findings

• The main regulatory document, NZS2772.1:1999, is criticized for being 20 years outdated and ignoring significant laboratory evidence.
• Arguments presented include the dismissal of early laboratory findings due to reduced RF emissions in newer cellphone models and the lack of solid data on population exposures.
• Contention exists between studies asserting RF's harmful effects versus those denying them, leading to a flawed approach in weighing evidence.

Conclusion

The paper concludes that the precautionary approach towards RF exposure is justified due to ethical and scientific concerns. It proposes certain measures to initiate this approach, emphasizing the need for a reevaluation of existing studies and regulatory practices.