Pilot Study of a New Methodology to Study the Development of the Blue Bottle Fly Under Exposure to Radio-Frequency Fields at 5.4 GHz

Authors: De Paepe S, De Borre E, Toribio Carvajal D, Bell D, Thielens A

Year: 2022 Aug 17

Category: Radiation Biology

Journal: International Journal of Radiation Biology

Institution: Int J Radiat Biol

DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2113838

URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35976063/

Abstract

Overview

This study delves into the developmental effects of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) on the Blue Bottle Fly (Calliphora vomitoria, CV), utilizing anatomically accurate 3D models for dosimetry and real-life exposure experiments.

Purpose

  • The research aims to understand how RF-EMFs at 5.4 GHz affect the development of insects, specifically employing the Blue Bottle Fly as a model organism.

Materials and Methods

  • The use of CV stems from its susceptibility to thermal influences during development, particularly during the pupal stage which presents an opportunity to expose immobile pupae to RF-EMF over several days.
  • The selected 5.4 GHz frequency allowed license-free operation, crucial for uninterrupted experimentation.
  • Advanced numerical electromagnetic simulations paired with micro-CT scans were used to create detailed 3D models of CV, facilitating precise dosimetry estimations of absorbed power and whole-body specific absorption rate (SAR) during exposure.
  • A controlled experiment was conducted with three exposure settings over 48 hours, including a sham exposure for comparison.

Results and Conclusions

  • Study findings showed no significant variation in mass, length, or diameter among all pupae groups—whether exposed, sham, or control.
  • However, the rate of pupal emergence was notably affected in one RF-EMF exposure (19.4 V/m) group showing a delayed emergence, while the higher exposure (55 V/m) somehow accelerated development.
  • Such findings contribute significantly to understanding the biological impacts of RF-EMFs, suggesting potential inadequacy in current safety standards when considering varied species sensitivity.
← Back to Stats