Abstract

Overview

This opinion article explores the critical need for reviewing and updating the measurement protocols and exposure regulations pertaining to environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs).

Findings

• The rapid increase in mobile phone subscriptions and the introduction of 5G technology underscore the urgency of reassessing current standards.
• Discrepancies in radiation measurement methodologies and exposure settings across studies prevent effective comparison and understanding of EMF impacts.
• Non-thermal effects of EMFs, such as genetic alterations and cellular viability, are often underestimated, and current standards mainly focus on thermal effects despite evidence suggesting otherwise.
• Different countries have varying regulations, with some adopting more stringent limits than others, indicating a need for harmonization.

Conclusion

The authors call for a comprehensive review of RF-EMF measurement methodologies to include a wider range of parameters such as frequency, intensity, and modulation, considering non-linear responses and bioactive windows. This holistic approach is crucial for determining more realistic characterization and ensuring public safety against potential health risks associated with RF-EMFs.