Development of health-based exposure limits for radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices using a benchmark dose approach

Authors: Uloma Igara Uche, Olga V Naidenko

Year: 2021

Category: Environmental Health

Journal: Environ Health

Institution: Environ Health

DOI: 10.1186/s12940-021-00768-1

URL: https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-021-00768-1

Abstract

Abstract

Overview

Current epidemiological studies and laboratory research consistently reaffirm that exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) is potentially harmful, affecting vital organs such as the heart and brain. This is crucial as it underscores the imperative need to revise and potentially lower the permissible exposure limits to RFR.

Objectives

This study aims to establish refined and health-orientated RFR exposure guidelines, measured in whole-body Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), which quantifies the energy RFR deposits into biological tissues.

Methods

  • Applied both frequentist and Bayesian averaging modeling to assess non-neoplastic lesion data from the U.S. National Toxicology Program studies.
  • Determined the benchmark doses (BMD) that trigger a 10% response rate beyond the natural occurrence.
  • Analyzed the potency of RFR in inducing cardiomyopathy and tumors in male and female rats using different modulations and frequency setups.

Findings

Significant findings included a highlighted increase in cardiomyopathy and tumorigenesis in male rats exposed to a frequency of 900 MHz under different modulations, namely CDMA and GSM, over various periods. Notably, lower threshold limits for cardiomyopathy were established, advocating for a RFR exposure limit that is substantially below the currently legal standards, particularly concerning the health of children.

Conclusion

The study firmly advocates for a reevaluation of current RFR exposure limits to a level much lower than present regulations to safeguard public health, especially that of younger populations. Calculated safe exposure recommendations suggest a 20-40-fold reduction compared to current standards is prudent for overall health safety.

← Back to Stats