Abstract

Overview

The article is a formal response by J. C. Lin to a letter by Foster, Chou, and Croft, which discussed their concerns about RF exposure health safety guidelines.

Findings

• The letter by Foster, Chou, and Croft argues predominantly that RF exposure concerns are solely heat-related.
• J. C. Lin acknowledges their position but provides a structured response to counteract their points systematically.

Conclusion

The response emphasizes the necessity to consider broader implications of RF exposure beyond just thermal effects in health safety protocols.