Commercial outdoor plant nurseries as a confounder for electromagnetic fields and childhood leukemia risk

Authors: A Nguyen, C M Crespi, X Vergara, L Kheifets

Year: 2022 May 10

Category: Epidemiology

Journal: Environ Res

DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113446

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935122007733?via%3Dihub

Abstract

Overview

This ground-breaking study investigates whether proximity to commercial plant nurseries, which often use pesticides, contributes independently to the risk of childhood leukemia or interacts with other environmental factors like proximity to power lines and exposure to magnetic fields.

Background

  • There's a significant concern about residential proximity to power lines and high magnetic field exposure, which previous studies suggest may elevate childhood leukemia risks.
  • Potential pesticide exposure at commercial plant nurseries located in powerline areas forms a complex environmental scenario in California.

Objectives

The study aims to assess if pesticide exposure at these nurseries could be a confounding factor, interacting with magnetic field exposure, to increase the risk of childhood leukemia.

Methods

The research utilizes an extensive case-control setup with thousands of cases and controls. It incorporates geographical information systems and other advanced tools for detailed exposure assessment.

Findings

  • While adjusting for confounders, a higher risk association was observed (OR 1.51) but slightly reduced upon isolating the nursery proximity variable.
  • No conclusive support was found for nurseries explaining the elevated risks linked to powerlines or magnetic fields.
  • Statistically significant findings were still noted when excluding subjects with high calculated fields or close powerline proximity, indicating an independent risk factor.

Conclusion

This comprehensive study clearly points out that the proximity to plant nurseries, and perhaps incidental pesticide exposure, is an independent risk factor for childhood leukemia. It underscores the complexity of environmental factors contributing to health risks and the need for rigorous analysis to untangle these associations.

← Back to Stats